Syntax
Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia p�ISSN: 2541-0849 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol.
8, No. 1, January
2023
ANALYSIS
OF THE EFFECT OF LIQUIDITY AND PROFITABILITY ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AT PT.
MAYORA INDAH TBK
Eldi1,
Ibrahim2*, Haeruddin3
STIEM
Bongaya Makassar1,2
Politeknik
Lembaga Pendidikan dan Pengembangan Profesi Makassar3
Email:
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Abstract
This study aims
to determine and analyze the effect of liquidity and profitability on financial
performance at PT Mayora Indah Tbk. This variable is Liquidity which is proxied
by Current Ratio, Profitability which is proxied by Return On Assets (ROA) and
financial performance which is proxied by Return On Equity (ROE). Data
collection techniques are documentation in the form of financial reports. The
data analysis performed was multiple linear regression analysis, classical
assumption test and basic statistical test using the SPSS program. Based on the
results of the data analysis carried out, the obtained multiple linear equation
model Ŷ=0.058-0.026X_1+2.235X_2 which means that liquidity partially has a
negative and not significant effect on financial performance with a value of
0.249 > 0.05, profitability partially has a positive and significant effect
on financial performance with a value of 0.001 <0.05. Simultaneously
liquidity and profitability affect financial performance with a value of 0.004
<0.05.
Keywords: Liquidity,
Profitability, Financial Performance.
Introduction
Company performance is
a picture of a company's financial condition which is analyzed by means of
financial analysis (Dewa & Sunrowiyati, 2016). So that it can
be known about the good and bad financial condition of a company that reflects
work performance in a certain period. The economic situation in Indonesia,
competition between companies is getting tougher, especially competition
between similar companies. Coupled with unstable economic conditions, companies
are required to survive in intense competition (Mohamad & Rahim, 2021). To be able to
survive, the company must pay attention to factors from within and outside the
company. Without neglecting factors from outside the company, factors from
within the company that need attention, one of which is the company's
performance (Niskhoiriyah, 2017). �
Companies in developing
countries today are no longer a secret that use debt as a driving force for
their company's performance. However, the use of this debt can also backfire
for the company itself because on the one hand the use of this debt can spur
the company's performance, but on the other hand this can plunge the company
into debt bondage or the company is experiencing financial distress and even
can experience bankruptcy if the debt is not managed properly (Sien, 2016).
The importance in
analyzing a financial report as a whole is to assess the comparison of balances
that are considered related, which can reflect the company's financial position
and the company's performance such as how the company's financial liquidity is,
the company's ability to pay off debt and the company's ability to generate
profits and something else, whether it is an improvement or a setback (Kaju, 2021). This
comparison is better known as the ratio.
In conducting the
analysis of financial statements can be done by analyzing each existing
financial ratios. Some of the financial ratio analysis that can be used in
assessing financial performance include analysis of liquidity ratios and
profitability ratios (Maith, 2013). Liquidity
ratio analysis can be used to measure a company's short-term liquidity
capability by looking at a company's current assets relative to its current
debt, while profitability ratios can be used to measure a company's ability to
generate profits at a certain level of sales, assets and share capital (Dewi et al., 2019).
PT Mayora Indah Tbk is
a company engaged in the Food and Beverage sector. In short Food and Beverage
is a company engaged in the field of food and beverages. The food and beverage
industry sector is one of the business sectors that continues to experience
growth (Kusumadewi, 2018). Along with the
increasing population growth in Indonesia, the volume of demand for food and
beverage continues to increase (Sari, 2016). The tendency
of the Indonesian people to enjoy ready-to-eat food has led to the emergence of
new companies in the field of food and drink. This can be seen from the number
of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the increasing number
of companies from period to period (Broto et al., 2018).
PT Mayora Indah Tbk is
a company that is not only known as a company that produces processed food and
beverages, but is also known as a market leader that has successfully produced
products that are pioneers in their respective categories. Currently, PT Mayora
Indah Tbk and its subsidiaries produce and generally classify the products they
produce into 2 (two) categories, namely: processed food and processed drinks,
which include 6 (six) divisions each of which produces different but integrated
products including: : Biscuits Division, Confectionery / Candy Division, Wafers
Division, Chocolate Division, Coffee Division, and Health Food Division. To
find out the net profit results of PT Mayora Indah Tbk for 2012-2021 can be
seen in the following table:
Table
1. PT Mayora Indah Tbk Net Profit for the 2012-2021 period
Year |
Liquidity (%) |
Profitability (%) |
Financial performance (%) |
2012 |
276,11 |
8,97 |
24,27 |
2013 |
244,34 |
10,90 |
26,87 |
2014 |
208,99 |
3,98 |
10,05 |
2015 |
236,53 |
11,02 |
24,07 |
2016 |
225,02 |
10,75 |
22,16 |
2017 |
238,60 |
10,93 |
22,18 |
2018 |
265,46 |
10,01 |
20,61 |
2019 |
342,86 |
10,71 |
20,60 |
2020 |
360,71 |
10,61 |
18,61 |
2021 |
232,82 |
6,08 |
10,66 |
Source: Indonesia Stock Exchange
Based on table 1. it
can be seen that liquidity, profitability and financial performance have
fluctuated, which means there have been increases and decreases. The highest
percentage obtained by liquidity occurred in 2020 with a percentage rate of
360.71%. As for profitability, the highest percentage occurred in 2015 with a
percentage value of 11.02%. In terms of financial performance, the highest
percentage occurred in 2013 with a percentage value of 26.87%.
This study uses
profitability ratio analysis, the ratio used in the profitability ratio
analysis is Return on Assets, because by using this ratio the detection to see
the profitability ratio will be more valid. While in the analysis of liquidity
ratios, the ratio used is the Current Ratio because this ratio is the ratio used
with the aim of knowing how far the company's current assets are used to pay
off its short-term liabilities. Financial performance is measured using Return
On Equity (ROE). So that with these three ratios used it can further examine
its relationship with company performance.
There are differences
in this study and previous research conducted by Mariam M. Lumempow, et al.
2021, namely conducting research at the company PT Indofood Sukses Makmur using
the quantitative method with the result that the liquidity ratio through
several indicators is in a bad condition because it is below the industry
average, and the profitability ratio is in a bad condition too because it
generates profits below the average industry average. Meanwhile, researchers
are currently conducting research in the company PT Mayora Indah Tbk by
emphasizing how a company's financial performance uses quantitative methods.
Based on the
description above, it shows the phenomenon that the level of a company's
financial performance affects the level of profitability and the level of
liquidity as happened in the last year and previously companies like Mayora
experienced a decline in sales and were unstable in managing profits.
Table
2. Previous Research
No |
Research
Name and Research Year |
Research Title |
Previous
Research Results |
4. |
(Octaviana, 2019)
|
Pengaruh Likuiditas, Profitabilitas dan
Solvabilitas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek
Indonesia Periode 2015-2017 |
The
results of this study indicate that the Loan to Deposit Ratio, Non Performing
Loans, Net Interest Margin, Operating Costs Operating Income, Debt to Equity
Ratio partially have a significant effect on Return On Assets. The Capital
Adequacy Ratio partially does not have a significant effect on Return On
Assets. Simultaneous testing of Liquidity (Loan to Deposite Ratio, Non
Performing Loans), Profitability (Net Interest Margin, Operating Costs
Operating Income), Solvability (Capital Adequacy Ratio, Debt to EquityRatio)
has a significant effect on financial performance (Return On Assets). |
5. |
(Saragi et al., 2015) |
Analisis Rasio Likuiditas dan Profitabilitas
Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan PT Kalbe Farma Tbk |
From
the research results, the authors conclude that the current ratio and profit
margin together have a positive and significant effect on the financial
performance of PT Kalbe Farma Tbk. |
Method
This research will be
carried out at PT Mayora Indah Tbk, but not directly to the company, data
collection is carried out using the Annual Report from the corner of the
Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) https://www.Idx.co.id/. This research will be
carried out in August 2022.
Data is a collection of
information that can mean broad and narrow. The broad definition of data is a
collection of information that can be created, processed, sent and analyzed. In
a narrow sense, data is in the context of research, so what is meant by data is
da is research data (Jamali Hisnol , Tahir
Taufik, Ibrahim, Fajriah Yana, 2022).
According to (Sugiyono, 2018) the types of
data are divided into 2, namely qualitative and quantitative. Based on this
opinion, the researcher chose the type of quantitative research. This study
uses secondary data sources. According to (Sugiyono, 2017) secondary data
are data sources that do not directly provide data to data collectors, for
example through other people or through documents. Based on this understanding,
the data is obtained from the financial report data of PT Mayora Indah Tbk
which can be accessed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.
Data collection
techniques Data collection techniques are a method used by researchers to
obtain data in research. The method used in data collection is the
documentation method. In this study, documentation data was obtained from the
Annual Report of PT Mayora Indah Tbk, which includes balance sheets and income
statements for the 2012-2021 period, where the data is already in the corner of
the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX).
According to (Sugiyono, 2019) population is a
generalized area consisting of: objects/subjects that have certain quantities
and characteristics determined by researchers to be studied and then
conclusions drawn. Based on this description, the population in this study is
PT Mayora Indah Tbk, which is engaged in food and Drink. According to (Sugiyono, 2019) The sample is
part of the number and characteristics possessed by this population. Based on
this description, the sample is the financial statements of PT Mayora Indah Tbk
for the 2012-2021 period.
The method used by
researchers is statistical analysis with the normality test method, simple
linear regression test and hypothesis testing. The purpose of using this method
is to find out how much significant influence the dependent variable (liquidity
and profitability) has on the independent variable (financial performance of PT
Mayora Indah Tbk).
Results and Discussions
A. Data
Presentation
Many analytical tools are used to assess a company's financial
performance, in this assessment only using financial ratio analysis consisting
of profitability ratios serves to measure how effectively a company operates so
as to generate profits. And the liquidity ratio serves to measure the company's
ability to meet its short-term obligations. In analyzing the profitability
ratios and liquidity ratios, the authors use financial reports in the form of
balance sheets and profit and loss for the last 10 years, namely from 2012 to
2021. The data in this study were obtained from PT Mayora Indah Tbk, which was
then processed.
PT Mayora Indah Tbk is an Indonesia-based company engaged in the
processed food and beverage sector. The products it produces are classified
into 2 (two categories), namely: processed food and processed drinks, which
includes 6 (six) divisions each of which produces different but integrated
products including: Biscuits Division, Confectionery / Candy Division, Wafers
Division, Chocolate Division, Coffee Division, and Health Food Division. Based
on the financial statements obtained from PT Mayora Indah Tbk, as a basis for
research on the company's financial performance. The following is the result of
the analysis of the financial performance of PT Mayora Indah Tbk, based on the
profitability ratio and liquidity ratio.
1.
Liquidity
Ratio
The liquidity ratio is the ratio that shows the company's ability to meet
its obligations or pay its short-term debt. To measure the liquidity ratio, you
can use the Current Ratio formula as follows:
2.
�Profitability Ratio
Profitability ratios can measure a company's ability to generate profits
at a certain level of sales, assets and share capital. The following is an
assessment of the financial performance of PT Mayora Indah Tbk with
profitability analysis. To measure profitability, researchers use the Return On
Assets (ROA) formula as follows:
3.
�Financial performance
Financial performance can be measured using the Return On Equity (ROE)
formula or the profitability of own capital which is used to measure net profit
after tax with own capital. This ratio describes efficiency in the use of own
capital. The higher the level of ROE, the better for the company. This position
of the owner of the company is getting stronger. The ROE formula that can be
used is as follows:
Table
3. Calculation results of the Current Ratio, Return On Assets and Return On
Equity at PT Mayora Indah Tbk for the 2012-2021 period
Year |
Liquidity (Current Ratio) |
Profitability
(Return On Asset) |
Financial
performance (Return On Equity) |
2012 |
2,761 |
0,090 |
0,243 |
2013 |
2,443 |
0,109 |
0,269 |
2014 |
2,090 |
0,040 |
0,100 |
2015 |
2,365 |
0,110 |
0,241 |
2016 |
2,250 |
0,107 |
0,222 |
2017 |
2,386 |
0,109 |
0,222 |
2018 |
2,655 |
0,100 |
0,206 |
2019 |
3,429 |
0,107 |
0,206 |
2020 |
3,607 |
0,106 |
0,186 |
2021 |
2,328 |
0,061 |
0,107 |
Source: Indonesia Stock Exchange
Based on table 3. it can be seen that liquidity as measured using the
current ratio formula has fluctuated or experienced a decrease and increase,
with the highest level of increase occurring in 2020 with a liquidity value of
3.607. Meanwhile, the lowest level of liquidity income occurred in 2014 with a
liquidity value of 2.090.
Profitability as measured using the return on assets formula also
fluctuated with the highest level of profitability income occurring in 2015
with a profitability value of 0.110. Meanwhile, the lowest level of
profitability occurred in 2014 with a total profitability of 0.040.
Financial performance as measured using the return on equity formula also
experiences fluctuations or increases and decreases. The highest level of
income on financial performance occurred in 2010 with a value of 0.269. While
the lowest financial performance income value occurred in 2014 with a value of
0.100.
4.
Normality test
To test whether the data taken is normally distributed, the researcher
uses the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to test whether the sample in the population
is normally distributed or not. This can be seen in Table 4.
Table
4. Normality Test
One-Sample
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
|
Unstandardized Residual |
|
N |
10 |
|
Normal Parametersa,b |
Mean |
.0000000 |
Std. Deviation |
.02510884 |
|
Most Extreme Differences |
Absolute |
.233 |
Positive |
.233 |
|
Negative |
-.136 |
|
Test Statistic |
.233 |
|
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
.133c |
|
a. Test distribution is Normal. |
||
b. Calculated from data. |
||
c. Lilliefors Significance Correction. |
Source: data processed by the SPSS program
Based on table 4. it can be seen from the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results
obtained a value of 0.133. It can be said that the sample obtained from the
population is normally distributed because 0.200 > 0.05.
5.
�Heteroscedasticity Test
This test is used to determine whether there is a heteroscedasticity
problem or not. Following are the results of the heteroscedasticity test.
Table
5. Heteroscedasticity Test
Coefficientsa
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
T |
Sig. |
||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
.024 |
.034 |
|
.696 |
.509 |
X1 |
-.001 |
.013 |
-.037 |
-.090 |
.931 |
|
X2 |
-.026 |
.276 |
-.038 |
-.093 |
.929 |
|
a.
Dependent Variable: RES2 |
Source: data processed by the SPSS program
Table 5. shows that the significance value of liquidity is 0.931, which
means 0.931 > 0.05. So it can be said that the liquidity variable does not
have a heteroscedasticity problem. Furthermore, on profitability it produces a
significance number of 0.929, which means 0.929 > 0.05. So it can be said
that the profitability variable has no heteroscedasticity problem.
6.
�Multiple Linear Regression Analysis
Multiple regression analysis is used to test the truth of the hypotheses
proposed in this study. According to Sujarweni (2016) the capital multiple
linear regression equation is as follows:
Description:
Ŷ ���������� = Bound Variable (Financial
Performance)
α ����������� = Constant
β ����������� = Regression Coefficient
���������� = First Independent Variable
(Liquidity)
���������� = Second Independent Variable
(Profitability)
e ����������� = Standard Error
Table 6. Multiple
Linear Regression Analysis
Coefficientsa
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
.058 |
.053 |
|
1.095 |
.310 |
X1 |
-.026 |
.021 |
-.234 |
-1.256 |
.249 |
|
X2 |
2.235 |
.431 |
.964 |
5.180 |
.001 |
|
a.
Dependent Variable: Y |
Source: data processed by the SPSS program
Based on
table 6. the results of multiple linear regression analysis, the multiple
linear regression equation is as follows:
Based on
the multiple regression equation, it can be interpreted as follows:
a.
Liquidity
(Current Ratio) and profitability (ROA) variables will be raised constant
(α) 0.058
b.
b1 = -0.026
with sig. 0.249, indicating that liquidity (Current Ratio) has a negative but
not significant effect on financial performance. This means that if the current
ratio decreases by 1% then the value of financial performance will decrease by
-0.026% assuming the other variables are constant.
c.
b2 = 2.235 with
sig. of 0.001, indicating that the variable profitability (ROA) has a positive
and significant effect on capital structure. This means that if ROA increases
by 1% then the value of financial performance will increase by 2.235% assuming
the other variables are constant.
7.
�Determination Coefficient Test
The
coefficient of determination test is used to determine the ability of the
independent variable to the dependent variable. To find out the ability of the
independent variable to influence the dependent variable, you can use the
following formula:
Description:
R2
����������������������� = Coefficient of
Determination
r2 ������������ = Correlation Coefficient
Table 7. Determination
Coefficient Test
Summary models
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
1 |
.894a |
.799 |
.741 |
.028471 |
a.
Predictors: (Constant), X2, X1 |
Source: data processed by the SPSS program
Based on
the results of the data obtained in table 4.7, it can be seen the magnitude of
the influence of the independent variables on the dependent variable using the
following formula:
From the
results of these calculations it can be seen that the influence of the
independent variables on the dependent variable at PT Mayora Indah Tbk is 0.799
or 79.9%. This shows that liquidity and profitability have an influence on
financial performance of 79.9%. The remaining 20.1% is influenced by other
factors not examined in this study.
8.
�t-test
The
t-test is used to determine the significance of the regression coefficient as
well as to test the proposed hypothesis. So that the results obtained by the
regression can be explained by the relationship, the results obtained by the
regression were tested using the t-test with a degree of confidence of 0.05.
Table
8. T-test results
Coefficientsa
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
.058 |
.053 |
|
1.095 |
.310 |
X1 |
-.026 |
.021 |
-.234 |
-1.256 |
.249 |
|
X2 |
2.235 |
.431 |
.964 |
5.180 |
.001 |
|
a.
Dependent Variable: Y |
Source: data processed by the SPSS program
Based on
the results of the t-test that has been carried out, it shows that liquidity
has a negative and insignificant effect on financial performance, with a
significance value (sig.) 0.249 > 0.05. Meanwhile, the profitability variable
has a positive and significant effect on financial performance at PT Mayora
Indah Tbk, with a significance value (sig.) 0.001 <0.05. So it can be
interpreted that H1 is rejected and H2 is accepted because the significance
value on liquidity is 0.249 > 0.05 and partial profitability is 0.001
<0.05.
9.
Test f
The f
test is used to determine the simultaneous effect of the independent variables
on the independent variables. So that the results obtained by the regression
can be explained by the relationship, the results obtained by the regression
were tested using the t-test with a degree of confidence of 0.05.
Table
9. Test Results f
ANOVAa
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
1 |
Regression |
.023 |
2 |
.011 |
13.880 |
.004b |
Residual |
.006 |
7 |
.001 |
|
|
|
Total |
.028 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
a.
Dependent Variable: Kinerja Keuangan |
||||||
b.
Predictors: (Constant), Profitabilitas, Likuiditas |
Source: data processed by the SPSS program
Based on the results of the f-test that has been carried out, it shows
that liquidity and profitability have a simultaneous effect on financial
performance, with a significance value (sig.) 0.004 <0.05. So it can be
interpreted that H1 is accepted because the significant value of F is <0.05,
namely 0.004 <0.05.
B. Discussion
of Research Results
1.
Partial Effect
of Liquidity on Financial Performance
Liquidity has a regression coefficient of -0.026 with a significant value
of 0.249>0.05. The results of this study indicate that liquidity has a
negative and insignificant effect on financial performance. The results of this
study are in line with research conducted by (Ramadhan, 2022) that liquidity has a negative and insignificant
effect on financial performance. If the liquidity generated by the company is
higher, the company's ability to fulfill its obligations will also be higher.
2.
Partial Effect
of Profitability on Financial Performance
Profitability has a regression coefficient of 2.235 with a significance
value of 0.001 <0.05. The results of this study state that company
profitability has a positive and significant effect on financial performance.
The research results obtained are in line with research conducted by (Ramadhan, 2022) that profitability partially has a positive and
significant effect on financial performance. If the profit generated by the
company is higher, it allows the company to use most of its funding from
internal company sources compared to external sources.
3.
The Effect of
Simultaneous Liquidity and Profitability on Financial Performance
Based on simultaneous testing, a significance value of 0.004 was
obtained. The results of this study state that liquidity and profitability
simultaneously have a significant effect on financial performance. The research
results obtained are in line with research conducted by (Ramadhan, 2022) and (Sapitri, 2018) that liquidity and profitability This means that
liquidity and profitability can jointly affect financial performance.
Conclusion
Based
on the results of data analysis and discussion it can be concluded that
Liquidity partially has a negative and not significant effect on financial
performance at PT Mayora Indah Tbk, Profitability partially has a positive and
significant effect on financial performance at PT Mayora Indah Tbk and
Liquidity and profitability simultaneously has a significant effect on the
financial performance of PT Mayora Indah Tbk.
Broto, A. H. K.,
Sripeni, R., & Permatasari, R. W. (2018). Pengaruh Biaya Produksi, Biaya
Administrasi Umum, dan Biaya Pemasaran Terhadap Laba Pada Perusahaan Food and
Beverages Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. JURNAL EKOMAKS Jurnal Ilmu
Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 7(2), 83�88.
https://doi.org/10.33319/jeko.v7i2.7.
Dewa, Y., &
Sunrowiyati, S. (2016). Analisis Rasio Keuangan Sebagai Alat Penilaian Untuk
Mengukur Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Pada SPBU Gedog. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa
Ekonomi (RITMIK), 3(2), 185�201.
Dewi, N. L. P. A.,
Endiana, I. D. M., & Arizona, I. P. E. (2019). Pengaruh Rasio Likuiditas,
Rasio Leverage Dan Rasio Profitabilitas Terhadap Financial Distress Pada
Perusahaan Manufaktur. Kumpulan Hasil Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi (KHARISMA),
1(1), 322�333.
Jamali Hisnol , Tahir
Taufik, Ibrahim, Fajriah Yana, K. A. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Bidang
Ilmu Akuntansi & Manajemen (D. Fadhila (ed.)). Mitra Cendekia Media.
Kaju, R. M. (2021). Analisis
Laporan Keuangan Untuk Menilai Kinerja Perusahaan Pada Pt. Indofood Cbp Sukses
Makmur, Tbk. Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) Periode Tahun
2018�2020. Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta.
Kusumadewi, R. N.
(2018). Pengaruh Return On Asset (ROA), Return On Equity (ROE), Dan Net Profit
Margin (NPM) Terhadap Harga Saham (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur
Sektor Food And Beverage Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode
2015-2017). MAKSI, 5(2), 164�176.
Maith, H. A. (2013).
Analisis Laporan Keuangan dalam Mengukur Kinerja Keuangan pada PT. Hanjaya
Mandala Sampoerna Tbk. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis
Dan Akuntansi, 1(3), 619�628.
https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.1.3.2013.2130.
Mohamad, R., &
Rahim, E. (2021). Strategi bauran pemasaran (marketing mix) dalam perspektif
syariah. MUTAWAZIN (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah), 2(1), 15�26.
https://doi.org/10.54045/mutawazin.v2i1.113.
Niskhoiriyah, N.
(2017). Analisis rasio keuangan untuk menilai kinerja keuangan pada PT.
Mayora Indah Tbk Periode 2008-2016. IAIN Padangsidimpuan.
Octaviana, M. (2019). Pengaruh
Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, dan Solvabilitas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan
Perbankan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015-2017. Kediri:
Fakultas Ekonomi.
Ramadhan, S. W. (2022).
Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Manufaktur di
Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan Kebijakan Deviden Sebagai Variabel Moderasi.
Universitas Islam Malang.
Sapitri, E. (2018). Pengaruh
Likuiditas dan Profitabilitas terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan (Studi pada
Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Barang Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di Daftar Efek
Syariah Periode 2012-2016). UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Saragi, E. F.,
Oktavianti, O., & Ariyati, Y. (2015). Analisa Rasio Likuiditas Dan
Profitabilitas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan PT. Kalbe Farma Tbk. BENING, 2(1),
1�19. https://doi.org/10.33373/bening.v2i1.856.
Sari, A. K. (2016). Analisis
Pengaruh Profitabilitas Terhadap Harga Saham Pada Perusahaan Food and Beverages
Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Tahun 2011-2014. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Sien, K. J. (2016).
Analisis Prediksi Kebangkrutan dengan Metode Altman Z�-Score pada PT Darma
Henwa, Tbk. dan Entitas Anak. FIN-ACC (Finance Accounting), 1(1),
161�175.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode
Penelitian kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode
Penelitian. CV Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, P. D. (2017).
Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan
R&D. CV. Alfabeta.
Copyright holder: Eldi, Ibrahim, Haeruddin (2023) |
First publication right: Syntax Literate: Jurnal
Ilmiah Indonesia |
This article is licensed under: |