ANALYSIS OF CORRUPTION CASE INVESTIGATION AFTER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LAW NO. 30 OF 2014

This research aims to examine granting discretion to government officials or state administration is a logical consequence of the welfare state's conception. This opens up opportunities for officials to commit corruption. Based on the administrative law, state officials' abuse of power is not a criminal offence but purely the administration's fault. However, with the issuance of the Government Administration Law, court judges from Corruption Crime have their right to judge whether there is an element of abusing their authority or not. Better laws and no negative impact or a growing number of problems. Evaluation and updating must be carried out to obtain maximum results and satisfy all parties. The first method employs in this research was the statute approach or the statutory approach. The second method used was a conceptual approach. The data collection used in this article is secondary data collection by finding and collecting data that has already been published in books, newspapers, magazines, journals, online portals regarding this issue. The result is there are still problems arising from the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014, especially on constitutional grounds, State Administrative Courts, and Corruption based on discretion. Several journals and studies have been conducted to corroborate this question. Therefore, it is necessary to make adjustments and improvements in several areas to obtain a better law and does not cause adverse impacts or a growing number of problems.


Introduction
Government Administration is regulated by a law called the Government Administration Act (Ćutić & Pađen, 2019). Law 30 of 2014 Government Administration guarantees fundamental rights and provides protection to citizens and guarantees the implementation of state duties as demanded by state law following Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28 D paragraph (3), Article 28 F, and Article 28 I paragraph (2) zof the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on these provisions, citizens of the community zare not objects but actively involved in government administration (Rini, 2018).
Authority is zthe zright zowned zby zGovernment Agencies and or Officials or other state administrators to make decisions and or actions in government administration (article 1 point 5). Meanwhile, zauthorityz is zthe power of zAgencies and or zGovernment zOfficials zor zother zstate zadministrators ztoz act zin zthe zrealm zof public zlaw (article z1 point z6). zThis law was issued to make a guideline or benchmark in government administration. For officials or public services, it must be based on the Government Administration Law. This law is part of material law. Material law is a collection of rules governing things that must be done, should be done, and should not be (prohibited) (Utami, 2015).
Government Administration Decisions are the product of government administration (Adeyemi, Akindele, Aluko, & Agesin, 2012 with the zmandate giver (Harjiyatni & Suswoto, 2017). Authority is closely related to this law (Raz, 2009). KBBI states that authority is zthe zpower zto zmake zdecisions to govern and delegate responsibilities to others. Several figures explain authority, such as Ibrahim (1: 2011), Prajudi Atmosudirjo, and SF Marbun, H. Muladi. What differentiate this and other research is the approaching method used in this research.

Method
The first method in this research was the statute approach or the statutory approach. The statute approach is a research that places the statutory approach as an approach in the form of legislation and regulation (Sugiyono, 2017). The second method used was a conceptual approach. These views and doctrines were used to find out the solution. The conceptual approach connects existing concepts with economic issues. This research utilizes a qualitative research method, obtaining credible secondary data from the internet and customizing it to the study's title. Data processing by looking for an overview of the research data, comparing the data obtained, and looking for the relationship between each data obtained in order to produce final conclusions about the research carried out is the analysis technique used (John, 2014).

Result and Discussion
In accordance with zArticle 1 zparagraph z (z 2) zof the z1945 zConstitution zof zthe zRepublic   zof  zIndonesia,  zsovereignty  zrests  zwith  zthe  zpeople  zand  zis  zexercised  zaccording  zto  zthe zConstitution. zFurthermore, zzaccording zzto zzArticle zz1 zparagraph z z(3) zof zthe 1945 zConstitution zof zthe zRepublic zof Indonesia, zthe zstate of Indonesia is a constitutional state. This means that the Republic of Indonesia's governing system must be based on the principle of people's sovereignty and the zrule zof zlaw. Based on these principles, all forms of Government Administration zzDecisions zzand zzor zzActions zzmust zzbe zzbased zzon zzthe zzpeople's sovereignty and zthe zlaw, which reflects Pancasila as the state ideology. Thus it is not based on the power inherent in the position of the governing body itself.
Concerning Law No.30 of 2014, the State Administrative Court's important role is to supervise juridical government legal actions that must be developed. This supervisory function is juridical supervision. The State Administrative Court's role in relation to government administration is as a touchstone for the object of government administration disputes. In carrying out its role, zthe zState zAdministrative zCourt zis zbased zon zgood zgovernance's zgeneral zprinciples, znamely zlegal zcertainty, zorderly zstate zadministration, zopenness, zproportionality, zprofessionalism, zand zaccountability. zzThe zState zAdministrative zCourt also examines the legality of administrative law regarding the use of governing power and officials' behaviour in implementing services to the community. This government power is exercised based on legality principles (Andhika, 2016).
This State Administrative Court has a unique relationship with good governance. The concept of good governance is a process of exercising state power in providing public goods and services. With this regulation of the zState zAdministrative zCourt, zit is zhoped that the results of court decisions that take into account the people's interests will be obtained. The State Administrative Court provides a glimmer of hope for the administration of law in Indonesia. zThe zState zAdministrative zzCourt zalso plays a role in assessing the acts of authority of government administrators. It is one of the references so that the government does not abuse the power it has been given. In conducting the assessment, the judge will tend to ask questions about the contradiction with the Law on State Business Administration and must also pay attention to the system and procedures of the administration of government and development tasks carried out by the government. The government has objectives set out in the law. These objectives are comprehensive; therefore, supervision and attention must be carried out carefully so that the government can continue to carry out its duties following the established foundations and guidelines.
This expansion certainly has an impact on increasing the number of cases resolved by the State Administrative Court. Pressure, intervention, influence from external institutions and the parties are also getting higher. Judges are also not immune to community intervention. Not infrequently, there are several cases, especially cases of bribery, which cause the judges' integrity to below, and of course, they are straightforward to influence. This bribery case shows that the handling of disputes based on the Government Administration Law causes the State Administrative Court's function to become weaker. This expansion of the courts' absolute competence can actually strengthen and weaken the functioning of the judiciary itself. However, this depends again on the independence of the parties involved in the court. This expansion causes the State Administrative Court's absolute authority to be increasingly exposed to intervention from outside the court. An example of a recent case is the matter of the Medan State Administrative Court.
To get a guarantee of obtaining fair protection from the judiciary, independence is very important. The existence of a court without independence is like a knife without a sharpener, and it is useless. Therefore, several standards for the independence of the judiciary are drawn up.
Corruption is bribery, abuse of power, forgery and other wrong things. Based on Law No.30 of 2014, the most visible problem is granting discretionary rights to government zofficials in making an action or decision. The definition of discretion, according to zArticle z1 zNumber z9 zof zLaw zNo. z30 zof z2014, zstates zthat z"zDiscretion zis za