Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia p�ISSN: 2541-0849
e-ISSN:
2548-1398
Vol.
6, No. 4, April 2021
THE AWARENESS TOWARDS
QUALITY� OF SERVICE FROM HOMESTAY
PROVIDERS IN PREMIUM TOURISM DESTINATION
Gregorius Antariksa Berybe, Elisabeth Oktaviani Hanggu dan Maria Beatrix Rahinart Wellalangi
Politeknik eLBajo Commodus, Nusa Tenggara Timur
Email: [email protected], [email protected] dan [email protected]
Abstract
This
research aims to know the understanding of homestay providers about the quality
of service. The research design of this study is descriptive quantitative where
data collected from the questionnaires that given to the homestay providers at
Liang Ndara Village, Labuan Bajo, with factors of analysis are: 1) Tourism Awareness,
�2) Sanitation and Hygiene, 3) Psychology
of Service, 4) Guest Service and English for Communication. The result of this
study shows that 84,9% of respondents are not aware of the importance of
sanitation and hygiene. English as a communication shows about 78,2% of respondents
are not using English as daily communication with the foreign guest. This lack
of interaction because of the effect of the psychology of service (8%) of
respondents are less confident having interaction. While factors shown by the
respondents are highly aware such as tourism awareness (100%) and 86,9%
respondents have shown their awareness of service. Providing quality of service
is required commitment from respondents to aware of those factors.
Keywords: homestay;
quality service; ASEAN homestay
standard
Introduction
The establishment of Labuan Bajo as a premium tourist
destination from the Indonesian Government has increased the visitor rate
either local or international. According to the Tourism Office of West
Manggarai Regency, in 2018, the number of tourists is 163.054 and it reaches
187.098 in 2019. This increased number of tourist visits gives an impact on the
accommodation sector. The number of accommodation facilities in West Manggarai
itself is 98 consisting of star rating hotels and nonstar rating in 2018 (manggaraibaratkab.go.id).
One of the tourist accommodations is a homestay. Often
located in rural areas actively owned, managed, and operated by the communities
where tourists reside and enjoy the local traditional activities and cultural
performances (Acharya and Halpenny, 2013).
Generally speaking, the location of the homestay is in the village area with
the aiming for local community development. The existence of homestay in the
village as an economic wheel for the locals with the efforts of daily activities
from the local community. One of the tourism villages in West Manggarai Regency
is Liang Ndara Village. In 2020, the number of homestays in Liang Ndara village
alone is 25 (twenty-five). The presence of a quality homestay that matches to (ASEAN Homestay
Standard, n.d.) becomes
important to support the improvement of tourism in Liang Ndara.
Lanier and Berman in (Wedatama & Mardiansjah, 2018) homestay is a condition where the tourist
who comes to visit a destination place chooses to rent accommodation during the
visit such as villager�s own house in the community in which an empty room is
provided to meet and interact with the visitor possible and that it adds the
owner�s house income up from the cost payment. Homestay itself makes an opportunity
as a source of income as it was also explained by (Kontogeorgopoulos, Churyen, & Duangsaeng, 2015) that
homestay represents the process of commercializing a residential space for
profitable purposes. Concerning management homestay, a local community in Liang
Ndara is demanded to offer quality service. The standard of homestay management
includes sanitation and hygiene of homestay and environmental around, guest
service standard, self-confidence when meeting the guest, and supported by
basic English competence for communication as a foundation to creating
interaction between the homestay providers and the tourist.
The challenge faced by the destination management is
how far the awareness of homestay providers regarding the factors that
influence the quality service referring to the (ASEAN Homestay
Standard, n.d.).
The activity and the familiar atmosphere in a homestay make it possible for the
guests to feel directly the way of life from the local community with the touch
quality service. As (Kontogeorgopoulos et al., 2015)
have stated that homestay in the tourism village enables the guests to see and
feel a slight look at the daily life of the villagers which is different from conventional
tourism.
The awareness of the homestay provider of his role as
tourism agent in the village has an impact on guest service. The lack of awareness
of his role may cause obstacles to the tourism development around. The previous
research shows that the local�s support beyond the tourism is very important
for the success of the community�s participation just because of the locals� level
of understanding following the other stakeholders� also stated that Managed
tourism can make a positive contribution to destinations, and thus it could receive
support from the local communities (Aref & Redzuan, 2009).
It is important to have a prior evaluation of the level of the local community awareness
and their knowledge about their perception of tourism development in their area.
Not only to help to identify the imbalance in the understanding of the community
about the concept but also to enlarge the program and policy that can be used
as a guide for the community to be more apprehensive on the process for tourism
development (Ismail, Hanafiah, Aminuddin, & Mustafa, 2016).
Basic competence of homestay management is fundamental concerning providing
quality service.
The importance of service psychology is to know the attitude
of the homestay provider relate to interaction and servicing guests.
Performance (personal grooming) of the homestay provider reflects cleanliness,
health, and it affects the feel of comfort on the side of the service user (guest)
(Suhartoyo, 2019).
The attitude when interacting with the guest will affect satisfaction for the
customer. Service as an economic activity is consumed when produced and it gives
an additional value of entertainment package, comfort, health, ease and need,
and other customer�s desires. The concept of widely more acceptable quality
service is more comparatively and it concentrates on the difference between the
expectation of the customer on the service work and actual experience in
service work (Review, Osman, & Sentosa, 2013).
Sanitation and hygiene are important elements in the hospitality
industry. According to (Wahyunanto, 2018),
sanitation is all efforts to prevent disease focusing on the human-environmental
health effort. The focus of sanitation is a clean environment. While hygiene is
the cleanliness as a process of how people keep and take care of self-health (Auliya & Aprilia, 2016),
where the focus is on personal hygiene (homestay provider).
As a part of the hospitality
industry, homestay is run in the accommodation sector by providing guest facilities
services such as room reservation, food and beverage services, souvenirs, or
local activities. Services will help identify gaps in the community's
understanding of the concept, but also to develop programs and policies that
can guide people to better understand the process and importance of tourism
development (C�rdenas, Byrd, & Duffy, 2015).
The interaction between the homestay provider and the
guest (tourist) creates a familiar atmosphere offered by the homestay manager
as a tourism product. The use of the English language should be a policy in
tourism management (Al-Saadi, 2015).
The competence to communicate in English will become a key factor when meeting
with foreign tourists. Foreign language brings recognition about external
communication. The skill in using a foreign language is important due to better
reciprocal relationships (Leslie & Russell, 2006).
English competence is required in running the homestay and that it will give
benefit for informal and formal communication. Therefore, the development of
communicative competence in the tourism business is very important to make tourism
management successful (Al-Saadi, 2015).
Methodology
This research uses an experimental approach including
quantitative research that will be made in Labuan Bajo, West Manggarai. In the
first step, a researcher has an interview as a pre-study. The aim of this
interview is a better understanding of the local need for developing homestay. The
premier data source will be gained from the distributed questionnaire sheets. The
secondary data are based on the national regulations, reports, journals, and
other documents.
The Judgemental sampling technique is taken from a homestay
provider in Liang Ndara village. The demography characteristics of the
respondents that will be collected are concerning sex, age, recent education,
and the time the homestay starts to operate.
The questionnaires with the title � The awareness of
the homestay provider on the importance of quality service� is shown below :
Table 1
Research questionnaires
No |
Variable |
Statement |
1 |
Tourism awareness |
a. I
realize that the homestay provider is a tourism agent. b. I understand
that homestay is one of the tourism products. c. I know
the difference between homestay and hotel. d. I
realize the role of the homestay provider as the guide of the tourism village. e. I know
the existence of homestay is to support tourism village development. f. I have
attended the training of tourism awareness for homestay providers. |
2 |
Sanitation and hygiene |
a. I know
the meaning of sanitation in the homestay area. b. I know
the meaning of hygiene for the homestay provider. c. I
understand the relationship between homestay and sanitation-hygiene. d. I
realize that sanitation and hygiene are the requirements for the homestay
operational. e. I have
implemented the correct sanitation and hygiene patterns in homestay
management f. I have
attended training related to sanitation hygiene for homestay providers. |
3 |
Psychology of service |
a. I understand
that good communication creates a familiar relationship with the guest. b. I feel
very confident when communicating with guests. c. I
understand the ethics of communicating with local and international guests. d. I have a
tidy performance when greeting the guest in the homestay. e. I often
interact with the guest who spends the night at the homestay. f. I have
attended training related to the psychology of service. |
4 |
Guest service |
a. I can communicate
with the guest correctly, properly, and honestly. b. I make a
proper gesture when serving the guest. c. I know
the procedure of how to receive guests, the information of reservations, food
and drink service, and the homestay facilities. d. I can give
a response to the guest properly and honestly who complains about my homestay
service. e. I have
attended training homestay guest service training. �� |
5 |
English for Communication |
a. I use English
as a language when welcoming guests, reservations, food and drink services,
and explanations of facilities and local attractions. b. I often
communicate with foreign tourists. c. I feel
confident when communicating with the English language. d. I feel
sufficient when communicating only in the Indonesian language. e. I
realize my English competence is increasing the quality of homestay service. f. I have attended
an English training for the homestay provider. |
� ��
A.
Data
Analysis
This
research uses 4 points Likert scale with the index score ranging from �
Strongly disagree� to Strongly agree� answers. The statements written in the
survey are positive statements that indicate that learning is running
effectively, if the respondent agrees, the index value will be even higher.
Collected data will be processed using SPSS statistical program to find out the
relationship between the framed questions and the variables already chosen. The
index values in each category are as follows :
Table 2
4 points of Likert Scale
Index
score |
Category |
Code |
1 |
Strongly
Disagree |
SD |
2 |
Disagree |
D |
3 |
Agree |
A |
4 |
Strongly Agree |
SA |
Results And Discussions
A.
Results
1. Demography
profile
The
survey was conducted on 23 homestay provider (n=23) in Liang Ndara Village with the following demographic
profiles :
a. Gender
Tabel 3 Gender (n=23) |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
Male |
12 |
52.2 |
52.2 |
52.2 |
Female |
11 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Table 1 shows 12 respondents or 52.2% were
male and 11 respondents or 47.8% were female.
b. Age
Respondents involved in this study aged 40
years and over were 15 people followed by a range of ages 30-40 years reaching
6 people and the remaining 2 people aged between 20-30 years.
Tabel 4 Age |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
20-30 Years |
2 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
30-40 Years |
6 |
26.1 |
26.1 |
34.8 |
|
40-50 Years |
8 |
34.8 |
34.8 |
69.6 |
|
50 Years up |
7 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
c. Last
education
The highest percentage for the latest education
is 60.9% or 14 people who are high school/equivalent graduates while the lowest
presentation is 1 person or 4.3% respectively of bachelor and diploma graduates
while the rest are junior high school graduates 5 people or 21.7% and SD
graduates are 2 people (8.7%).
Tabel 5 Last
education |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
SD |
2 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
SMP |
5 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
30.4 |
|
SMA/ekuivalent |
14 |
60.9 |
60.9 |
91.3 |
|
Diploma |
1 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
95.7 |
|
Sarjana |
1 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
d. Operational
Homestay
Homestay
in Liang Ndara has been operating since 2010 until now and the number continues
to increase according to the head village.
Tabel 6 Operasional homestay |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
2010 |
1 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
2013 |
6 |
26.1 |
26.1 |
30.4 |
|
2014 |
4 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
47.8 |
|
2015 |
1 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
52.2 |
|
2016 |
2 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
60.9 |
|
2017 |
2 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
69.6 |
|
2018 |
6 |
26.1 |
26.1 |
95.7 |
|
2019 |
1 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
2.
Tourism Awareness
Tabel 7 Tourism Awareness |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
Agree |
13 |
56.5 |
56.5 |
56.5 |
Strongly Agree |
10 |
43.5 |
43.5 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Respondents'
understanding of the existence of a homestay as part of a tourism village
product is very high where 100% of respondents chose to agree was 13 people or
56.5% and strongly agree was 43.5% or 10 people. It can be concluded that
homestay managers have understood the role of homestays as part of tourism
products. As tourism actors, homestay managers play a role in the development
of tourism village products as a criterion for the host community (Budi Wahyuni & F.P., 2020).
This result is also shown by the study of (Sihombing, Gunawijaya, & Akbar, 2017)
where almost all of the respondents of the study were aware that they have an important
role in participation.
3.
Sanitation and Hygiene
Tabel 8 Sanitation and Hygiene |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
Strongly Disagree |
1 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
Disagree |
19 |
82.6 |
82.6 |
87.0 |
|
Agree |
3 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
The
cleanliness of the homestay and the surrounding environment is one of the
findings in this study. This can be seen from the respondent's data index which
reached 86.9% or 20 respondents who chose "disagree and strongly
disagree". This can be interpreted as a lack of understanding of the
homestay provider on the importance of implementing sanitation and hygiene in
the homestay environment. (Saud, Uma, & Silwal, 2019)
stated that the health, sanitation, and safety of tourists must be a priority
for every homestay or hotel. Homestay providers must consider cleanliness as an
important thing by doing the best possible cleaning (Budi Wahyuni & F.P., 2020).
4.
Psychology of Service
Tabel 9 Psychology of Service |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
Disagree |
8 |
34.8 |
34.8 |
34.8 |
Agree |
15 |
65.2 |
65.2 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Respondents'
understanding of behavior in interacting with guests is quite good where 65.2%
or 15 respondents understand the importance of service psychology. On the other
hand, the number of respondents who did not understand the importance of
service psychology showed a fairly high indicator, namely 34.8% or 8
respondents from a total of 23 respondents. The importance of confidence and
ethics when communicating with tourists is well understood by the community. It
can be concluded that the homestay provider understands the importance of
service psychology in the process of interacting with guests.
5.
Quality of Service.
Table 10 Quality of Service |
||||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
Valid |
Disagree |
3 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
Agree |
13 |
56.5 |
56.5 |
69.6 |
|
|
Strongly Agree |
7 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
100.0 |
|
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
The
majority of respondents 30.4% or 7 people chose "strongly agree" and
56.5% or 13 people chose "agree". This
is interpreted as Guest service procedures have been understood and implemented
by the homestay provider. The results of the study (Review et al., 2013) �state that quality services have a direct
impact on tourist trust through tourist satisfaction. It can be concluded that
the respondents have understood the importance of the quality of services
provided to guests. The finding of the study from (Al-Laymoun, Alsardia, & Albattat, 2020)
shows strong and positive correlations between service quality and tourist
satisfaction.
6.
English for Communication
Tabel 11 English for Communication |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
Strongly Disagree |
1 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
Disagree |
17 |
73.9 |
73.9 |
78.3 |
|
Agree |
5 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
23 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
The low ability to communicate in English
with foreign tourists is found in this study. The table above shows that 73.9%
or 17 people "disagree" and 4.3% or 1 person "strongly
disagree" that they use English communication when interacting with
foreign tourists. This is defined as the respondent's lack of English language
skills when communicating with guests. English is important for information
exchange in a variety of situations such as coffee shops, homestays,
restaurants, and community learning centers (Nomnian, Trupp, Niyomthong, Tangcharoensathaporn,
& Charoenkongka, 2020).
As a tourist actor, homestay providers are expected to be able to communicate
in English when dealing with foreign tourists. tourism employees use English
for information, followed by providing services, and offering assistance (Prachanant, 2012).
B. Discussions
The
understanding of service quality is the foundation of this study. The results
showed that the understanding of homestay managers related to tourism awareness,
the psychology of services, and services to guests showed positive results.
This means that homestay managers understand the importance of ethics and
interaction in serving guests. The findings in the study (Review et al., 2013)
that rural tourism (village) spots should put in place good customer
relationships with tourists, execute customer relationship management and
create tourist satisfaction. This is inversely proportional to the
understanding of hygiene sanitation which shows negative results. This means
that the level of understanding of homestay managers on the importance of
sanitation is still low. The results of the study (Saud et al., 2019)
show that more than 90% of homestays in Nepal had managed a healthy
environment, proper sanitation, and peace and security in homestays. The status
was satisfactory in the study districts. (Elysia & Wihadanto, 2020)
also state that access to basic sanitation facilities is considered as one of the
aspects that should be considered to support the tourism industry, particularly
in developing countries. Another negative finding from this study is the low
use of English as a communication medium. This means that the English language
skills of the homestay manager are still low and need to be improved. People
who are required to use English at work for tourism and hospitality purposes
need to improve their communicative abilities, language fluency, and accuracy (Zahedpisheh, B Abu bakar, & Saffari, 2017).
Conclusion
As
one of the tourism products in Liang Ndara village, suitable homestay management
(ASEAN Homestay
Standard, n.d.)
must be implemented in every homestay. The application of these standards is
strongly influenced by the understanding of the homestay providers about the
existence of a homestay as part of a tourism product. The understanding of
quality services will be the key to implementing sustainable tourism in a
homestay environment
The
findings of this study indicate the need for training related to the application
of sanitation and hygiene principles as well as English communication skills
training. This is a form of response that can be made by tourism village
management to improve service quality standards from homestay managers in Liang
Ndara Village, Labuan Bajo as a premium tourist destination in Indonesia.
REFERENCES
Acharya, Baikuntha Prasad, & Halpenny, Elizabeth A. (2013). Homestays
as an Alternative Tourism Product for Sustainable Community Development: A Case
Study of Women-Managed Tourism Product in Rural Nepal. Tourism Planning and
Development, 10(4), 367�387.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2013.779313. Google Scholar
Al-Laymoun, Mohammad, Alsardia, Khaled, & Albattat, Ahmad. (2020).
Service quality and tourist satisfaction at homestays. Management Science
Letters, 10(1), 209�216. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.002. Google Scholar
Al-Saadi, Nawar. (2015). Importance of English Language in the Development
of Tourism. Academic Journal of Accounting and Economics Researches, 4(1),
33�45. Retrieved from www.worldfresearches.com. Google Scholar
Aref, Fariborz, & Redzuan, Ma�rof. (2009). Community Leaders�
Perceptions toward Tourism Impacts and Level of Building Community Capacity in
Tourism Development. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(3).
https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v2n3p208. Google Scholar
Asian Homestay Standard. (n.d.). Google Scholar
Auliya, Anisatul, & Aprilia, Dinda Nira. (2016). Pengaruh Hygiene
Pengolahan Makanan Terhadap. 2(2). Google Scholar
Budi Wahyuni, Retno, & F.P., Faisal. (2020). Homestay Development
With Asean Homestay Standard Approach In Nglanggeran Tourism Village,
Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 111(Icoborot 2018), 30�36.
https://doi.org/10.2991/icoborot-18.2019.5 Google Scholar
C�rdenas, David A., Byrd, Erick T., & Duffy, Lauren N. (2015). An
exploratory study of community awareness of impacts and agreement to
sustainable tourism development principles. Tourism and Hospitality Research,
15(4), 254�266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415580359. Google Scholar
Elysia, Vita, & Wihadanto, Ake. (2020). the Impact of Poor Sanitation
on Tourism Development: a Global Review. Indonesian Journal of Urban and
Environmental Technology, 3(2), 220.
https://doi.org/10.25105/urbanenvirotech.v3i2.6720. Google Scholar
Ismail, Mohd Noor Ismawi, Hanafiah, Mohd Hafiz, Aminuddin, Norliza, &
Mustafa, Norazah. (2016). Community-based Homestay Service Quality, Visitor
Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intention. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 222, 398�405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.192. Google Scholar.
Kontogeorgopoulos, Nick, Churyen, Anuwat, & Duangsaeng, Varaphorn.
(2015). Homestay Tourism and the Commercialization of the Rural Home in
Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(1), 29�50.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2013.852119. Google Scholar
Leslie, David, & Russell, Hilary. (2006). The importance of foreign
language skills in the tourism sector: A comparative study of student
perceptions in the UK and continental Europe. Tourism Management, 27(6),
1397�1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.016. Google Scholar
Nomnian, Singhanat, Trupp, Alexander, Niyomthong, Wilawan,
Tangcharoensathaporn, Prakaimook, & Charoenkongka, Anan. (2020). Language
and community-based tourism: Use, needs, dependency, and limitations. Austrian
Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13(1), 57�79.
https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0029. Google Scholar
Prachanant, Nawamin. (2012). Needs Analysis on English Language Use in
Tourism Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66,
117�125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.253. Google Scholar
Review, Management Quarterly, Osman, Zahir, & Sentosa, Ilham. (2013). Influence
of Customer Satisfaction on Service Quality and Trust. 4(2), 12�25. Google Scholar
Saud, Tul Bahadur, Uma, Prof, & Silwal, Kant. (2019). Health,
Sanitation, and Security in Homestay of Nepal. 5(11), 14�16. Google Scholar
Sihombing, Ir Antony, Gunawijaya, Jajang, & Akbar, Poeti Nazura
Gulfira. (2017). Local tourism awareness and knowledge: Community views in
Wanayasa. E-Review of Tourism Research, 14(5�6), 188�213. Google Scholar
Suhartoyo, Suhartoyo. (2019). Implementasi Fungsi Pelayanan Publik dalam
Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (PTSP). Administrative Law and Governance
Journal, 2(1), 143�154. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i1.143-154. Google Scholar
Wahyunanto. (2018). Penerapan Hygiene Dan Sanitasi Dalam Upaya Peningkatan
Mutu Kualitas Food And Baverage (Studi Pada Pantai Konang Desa Ngelebeng
Kecamatan Panggul Kabupaten Trenggalek). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 58(2),
146�154. Google Scholar
Wedatama, Abid Affandi, & Mardiansjah, Fadjar Hari. (2018).
Pengembangan Homestay Berbasis Masyarakat Pada Kampung Homestay Borobudur. Jurnal
Pengembangan Kota, 6(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.6.2.135-143. Google Scholar
Zahedpisheh, Nahid, B Abu bakar, Zulqarnain, & Saffari, Narges.
(2017). English for Tourism and Hospitality Purposes (ETP). English Language
Teaching, 10(9), 86. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p86. Google Scholar
Copyright holder: Gregorius
Antariksa Berybe, Elisabeth Oktaviani Hanggu dan Maria Beatrix Rahinart
Wellalangi (2021) |
First
publication right: Journal Syntax Literate |
This article is
licensed under: |