Dampak Implementasi Pembayaran Berbasis Kinerja (Pay-For-Performance) Pada Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama (FKTP) Terhadap Kualitas Layanan Kesehatan Di Berbagai Negara
Abstract
The pay-for-performance (P4P) mechanism is a strategy in the health sector to increase the availability, quality and utilization of health services. In P4P, incentives are given after achieving a series of agreed outcomes by improving the performance of health workers in health facilities. This literature review was conducted with the aim of knowing the impact of implementing pay-for-performance at primary care (FKTP) on the quality of health services in various countries. The method is carried out by searching several databases, namely Pubmed, Embase, and Proquest with the main intervention being the implementation of pay-for-performance. The results of the review focused on the impact of implementing pay-for-performance at First Level Health Facilities on the quality of health services in various countries. From this study it can be concluded that pay-for-performance has been used in various countries with different numbers and areas (domains) of indicators adapted to the characteristics of primary care in a country. Some of the benefits of implementing pay-for-performance are that it can stimulate quality improvement in clinical care and improve patient experience of the role of general practitioners and the system of care. P4P can improve the process and outcome of cardiovascular treatment. Providing incentives can have an effect on improving the quality of performance in clinical practice. Providing P4P incentives can meet the quality measures of hypertension care recommended by the guidelines. In the United States, the provision of P4P incentives can increase physician compliance to provide hypertension drugs according to guidelines. Providing incentives can also have an impact on improving blood pressure control in hypertensive patients.
Downloads
References
Beals, B. (2012). Pay-for-performance. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 2(3), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1300/J186v02n03_10
BPJS Kesehatan. (2019). Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Pembayaran Kapitasi Berbasis Kinerja pada Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama (Peraturan BPJS Kesehatan Nomor 7 Tahun 2019). Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan.
Chimhutu, V., Lindkvist, I., & Lange, S. (2014). When incentives work too well: locally implemented pay for performance (P4P) and adverse sanctions towards home birth in Tanzania - a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-23
Das, A., Gopalan, S. S., & Chandramohan, D. (2016). Effect of pay for performance to improve quality of maternal and child care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2982-4
Fernández Urrusuno, R., Montero Balosa, M. C., Pérez Pérez, P., & Pascual de la Pisa, B. (2013). Compliance with quality prescribing indicators in terms of their relationship to financial incentives. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 69(10), 1845–1853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1542-4
Fleetcroft, R., Steel, N., Cookson, R., Walker, S., & Howe, A. (2012). Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-94
Gill, P. J., O’Neill, B., Rose, P., Mant, D., & Harnden, A. (2014). Primary care quality indicators for children: Measuring quality in UK general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 64(629), e752–e757. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682813
Grigoroglou, C., Munford, L., Webb, R. T., Kapur, N., Doran, T., Ashcroft, D. M., & Kontopantelis, E. (2018). Association between a national primary care pay-for-performance scheme and suicide rates in England: spatial cohort study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 213(4), 600–608. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.143
Kirschner, K., Braspenning, J., Akkermans, R. P., Annelies Jacobs, J. E., & Grol, R. (2013). Assessment of a pay-for-performance program in primary care designed by target users. Family Practice, 30(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cms055
Kirschner, K., Braspenning, J., Jacobs, J. E. A., & Grol, R. (2012). Design choices made by target users for a pay-for-performance program in primary care: an action research approach. BMC Family Practice, 13, 25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-25
Kolozsvári, L. R., Orozco-Beltran, D., & Rurik, I. (2014). Do family physicians need more payment for working better? Financial incentives in primary care. Atencion Primaria, 46(5), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2013.12.014
Kontopantelis, E., Springate, D. A., Ashworth, M., Webb, R. T., Buchan, I. E., & Doran, T. (2015). Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study. BMJ : British Medical Journal (Online), 350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h904
Maharani, C., Afief, D. F., Weber, D., Marx, M., & Loukanova, S. (2019). Primary care physicians’ satisfaction after health care reform: a cross-sectional study from two cities in Central Java, Indonesia. BMC Health Services Research, 19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4121-2
Minchin, M., Roland, M., Richardson, J., Rowark, S., & Guthrie, B. (2018). Quality of care in the United Kingdom after removal of financial incentives. New England Journal of Medicine, 379(10), 948–957. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1801495
Petersen, L. A., Ramos, K. S., Pietz, K., & Woodard, L. D. (2017). Impact of a Pay-for-Performance Program on Care for Black Patients with Hypertension: Important Answers in the Era of the Affordable Care Act. Health Services Research, 52(3), 1138–1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12517
Petersen, L. A., Simpson, K., Pietz, K., Urech, T. H., Hysong, S. J., Profit, J., Conrad, D. A., Dudley, R. A., & Woodard, L. D. (2013). Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial. JAMA, 310(10), 1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.276303
Rudasingwa, M., & Uwizeye, M. R. (2017). Physicians’ and nurses’ attitudes towards performance-based financial incentives in Burundi: a qualitative study in the province of Gitega. Global Health Action, 10(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1270813
Saint-Lary, O., Leroux, C., Dubourdieu, C., Fournier, C., & François-Purssell, I. (2015). Patients’ views on pay for performance in France: A qualitative study in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 65(637), e552–e559. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X686149
Copyright (c) 2023 Uswatun Khasanah, Mardiati Nadjib
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
