Maturity Assessment of Knowledge Management as A Strategic Tool to Engage Generation Z and Enhance Sustainable Operations: A Case Study of Indonesia’s MRO Company

  • Mohammad Rheza Fahlevi School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
  • Hary Febriansyah School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Keywords: Knowledge Management, Generation Z, Employee Engagement, Sustainability, KM Maturity, MRO Industry, GMF AeroAsia.

Abstract

PT Garuda Maintenance Facility AeroAsia (GMF) faces challenges in organizational knowledge management due to generational shifts or the retirement of experienced employees and the emergence of Generation Z with different learning preferences. Effective Knowledge Management (KM) is key in maintaining operational continuity, driving innovation, and increasing new generation engagement. This research aims to assess KM maturity at GMF from the perspective of Gen Z employees, identify the specific challenges they face, and provide strategic recommendations for KM improvements that support engagement and sustainability. The research used a case study method with a mixed approach. Quantitative data was obtained through the Asian Productivity Organization (APO) KM Assessment Tool survey, while qualitative data was collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), interviews, analysis of open-ended survey responses, and review of company documents. Analysis was conducted using statistical methods for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data. Results show that Gen Z rated GMF's KM maturity at Level 4 (Refinement), but there are still barriers in knowledge access, relevance of KM content, and lack of alignment with Gen Z's digital and interactive preferences. Cultural barriers also hinder widespread KM adoption. This research proposes a multi-pillar strategy to build a vibrant and inclusive KM ecosystem, and provides a framework that can be replicated by other organizations facing similar challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anand, B., Mishra, I., Beri, G., & Chaudhary, K. L. (2024, September). Types of learning: Domains of learning – Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor, learning theories, experiential learning. In Extension methods, ICT and educational technology (pp. 53–82).
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update—Fourth edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball Sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148
Janssen, D., & Carradini, S. (2021). Generation Z Workplace Communication Habits and Expectations. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2021.3069288
Jayasekera, K. G. T., Ahmad, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (n.d.). Managing Knowledge in Tourism Industry: A Nonaka’s SECI Model. 5(7).
Kirchmayer, Z. (2020). What Motivates Generation Z at Work? Insights into Motivation Drivers of Business Students in Slovakia.
López-Torres, G. C., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Kumar, V., Rocha-Lona, L., & Cherrafi, A. (2019). Knowledge management for sustainability in operations. Production Planning & Control, 30(10–12), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1582091
Momen, A., Ebrahimi, M., & Hassan, A. M. (2022). Importance and implications of theory of Bloom's Taxonomy in different fields of education. In A. E. Hassanien, M. A. Elhoseny, & D. Dey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems (ICETIS 2022) (pp. 515–525). . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26598-8_48
North, K., & Kumta, G. (2018). Knowledge Management. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59978-6
Ortiz Barrera, M. (2023). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge: Drivers of the Competitiveness of Universities. Mercados y Negocios, 50, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.32870/myn.vi50.7708
Peredy, Z., Vigh, L., Quingyu, W., & Muyi, J. (2024). Analysing Generation Z Communication Attitudes, Values and Norms. Acta Periodica, 30, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.47273/AP.2024.30.4-19
Published
2025-05-06