Menilik Peran Jaksa dalam Pengentasan Persoalan Overcrowding di Indonesia
Abstract
The overcrowding of inmates in correctional institutions has raised Indonesia's ranking as one of the top ten countries in the world that have problems related to overcrowding. At least we can examine this phenomenon from 2 (two) points of view, namely overcrowding as a logical consequence of the high number of cases that enter the court (overloaded) and the high number of cases sentenced to prison. This paper aims to analyze the role of the Prosecutor's Office in overcoming the problem of overcrowding. The research uses a doctrinal research method with a qualitative approach through literature studies and legal comparisons. The results of the study show that against the phenomenon of overcrowding, the Prosecutor's Office has a central role to screen cases that can enter the court stage through the implementation of criminal case settlement outside the court even though the current legal framework is very limited. In addition, the Prosecutor's Office also has a central role in determining changes in sentencing policies in order to popularize the criminal justice system through the imposition of the charges that are prepared.
Downloads
References
Anderson, A.M. 2014. Alternative Disposal of Criminal Cases by the Prosecutor: Comparing the Netherlands and South Africa. Disertasi Doktor, University of Amsterdam.
Andi Hamzah dan RM Surachman. 2014. Pre-trial Justice Disecretionary Justice. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Ashworth, Andrew. 2010. Sentencing and Criminal Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bennet, Mike. Unpublished speech to the Metropolitan Police Federation, sebagaimana dikutip dari Fionda, Julia. Public Prosecution and Discretion: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, New York, 2003, hal. 177.
Burhanuddin, ST. Reda Mathovani, dan Narendra Jatna, Membedah Undang-Undang Kejaksaan: Kajian Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasila, 2022,.
Fionda, Julia. 2003. Public Prosecution and Discretion: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabriel, Hallevy. 2019. The Right to Be Punished: Modern Doctrinal Sentencing. New York: Routledge.
Gazal-Ayal, Oren dan Limor Riza, “Plea Bargaining and Prosecution” dalam Criminal Law and Economics: Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, ed. Nuno Garoupa (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009).
Hamzah, Andi dan RM Surachman. 2014. Pre-trial Justice Disecretionary Justice. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Jehle, Jorg-Martin, dan Marianne Wade. 2006. Coping with Overload Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutor Power Across Europe. Gottingen: Springer.
Luna, Erik dan Marianne Wade. 2010. “Prosecutors as Judge.” Washington & Lee Law Review Vol. 1413.
Miethe, Terance dan Hong Lu. 2005. Punishment: A Comparative Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Napitupulu, Erasmus A.T., dkk. 2019. Hukuman Tanpa Penjara: Pengaturan, Pelaksanaan, dan Proyeksi Alternatif Pemidanaan Non Pemenjaraan di Indonesia. Jakarta: ICJR.
Nelson, Febby Mutiara. 2020. Plea Bargaining & Deferred Prosecution Agreement. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Osborough, Nial. 1969. “The Emergence of The Suspended Sentence in England,” SUMMER 1969, new series, Vol. 4, No. 1.
Novian, Rully, et al. 2018. Strategi Menangani Overcrowding di Indonesia: Penyebab, Dampak dan Penyelesaiannya. Jakarta: Institute For Criminal Justice Reform.
Swaaningen, R. Van, dkk. 1992. A Decade of Criminological Research and Penal Policy in The Netherlands. Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
Tonry, Michael H., dan Richard S. Frase, eds. 2001. Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Kempen, Piet Hein, et al., eds. 2019. The Criminal Justice System of the Netherlands. Nijmegen: Intersentia.
Berita dan Laporan
Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS). 2025. Penelitian Disparitas dan Kebijakan Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia. Diakses pada 26 Juni 2025. https://ijrs.or.id/publikasi-ijrs/penelitian-disparitas-dan-kebijakan-penanganan-perkara-tindak-pidana-narkotika-di-indonesia-2/
Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS). 2025. Laporan Penelitian: Overcrowding di Lapas Indonesia: Penyebab, Dampak, dan Penyelesaian. Diakses pada 26 Juni 2025. https://ijrs.or.id/
Indonesia Jentera. 2025. “Perlunya Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana untuk Mengatasi Overcrowding Lapas.” Diakses pada 26 Juni 2025. https://www.indonesiajentera.ac.id/.
Mahkamah Agung RI. 2020. Laporan Tahunan 2020. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
———. 2021. Laporan Tahunan 2021. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
———. 2022. Laporan Tahunan 2022. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
———. 2023. Laporan Tahunan 2023. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
———. 2024. Laporan Tahunan 2024. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Om.nl. 2025. “Strafbeschikking.” Diakses pada 3 Juni 2025, pukul 23:35. https://www.om.nl/onderwerpen/strafbeschikking.
Copyright (c) 2025 Adery Ardhan Saputro, Aditya Weriansyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







