CSR Transformation Towards Sustainability: a Case Study of Environmental Program in PT Kideco Jaya Agung (Kampung Iklim Program in Klempang Sari Village, Paser Regency)
Keywords:
Community Empowerment, Corporate Social Responsibility, Environtmental, ProKlim, Sustainable Development Goals
Abstract
This research explores the change of CSR at PT Kideco Jaya Agung (KJA), specifically the research is focused on Climate Village program (ProKlim program) at Klempang Sari Village, Indonesia. In a descriptive qualitative approach, the study explores planning, implementation and stakeholder involvement through data collection and analysis of fieldwork and data on file. Results indicate that the CSR inversion integrates environmental governance, community empowerment, and contributes to the alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 13 and 15). Tangible results are mangrove restoration, water saving, circular waste activities. This research utilizes Goal Attainment Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Program Logic Model and Triple Bottom Line to assess impact. The strong internal validity was further enhanced by demonstrating "how the CSR in the extractive sector can move beyond philanthropic behavior and compliance towards strategic and participatory sustainability. The paper provides lessons for including ESG in rural climate action through multi-level collaboration and local institutionalization.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
[1] Annual Report Kideco. (2023). Inklusif, Kolaboratif, dan Berdampak.
[2] Annual Report Kideco. (2024). Annual Report Kideco 2024.
[3] Baba, M., & Suryani, S. (2023). Community-based climate adaptation practices in Indonesia’s ProKlim program. Environmental Research iand Public Policy, i2(1).
[4] Bamberger, M., Vaessen, J., & Raimondo, E. (2016). Dealing With Complexity in Development Evaluation: A Practical Approach. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399935
[5] Barker, C., & Murray, R. (2021). Co-Designing CSR for Social License: Evidence from Environmental Projects. Journal of Sustainability Engagement. E3S Web of Conferences, 250. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125006003
[6] Bascompta, M., Sanmiquel, L., Vintró, C., & Yousefian, M. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility Index for Mine Sites. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013570
[7] Colak, M., & Sarioglu, M. (2025). The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Quality of Integrated Reporting and ESG Risk Ratings. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114868
[8] Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed).
[9] Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone.
[10] Freeman, R. (1984). Freeman RE. Strategic Management, A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
[11] Hatry, H. (1999). Performance Measurement Getting Results.
[12] Jasi?ska, E., & Jasi?ski, M. (2022). Mining Industry Corporate Social Responsibility to Education Development. Resources, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11070065
[13] KLHK. (2016). Ministerial Regulation No. 84MENLHK2016 on ProKlim.
[14] Law No. 42009 & PP No. 782010 on Mining CSR. (2010). Law No. 42009 & PP No. 782010 on Mining CSR.
[15] Lincoln, Yvonna. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry.
[16] Lozano, R. (2015). A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325
[17] Matikainen, L. S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility programs in mining areas: insights form stakeholder groups in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2357675
[18] Moleong. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370561417
[19] Nurhasanah, M., Sanatosa, E., & Nugroho, S. (2023). Community-mediated mangrove rehabilitation via CSR: Lessons from coastal Java. Sustainability. Sustainability, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043456
[20] Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.
[21] Parsons, T. (1951). Talcott Parsons - The Social System (1951).
[22] OJK. (2017). SAL POJK 51 - keuangan berkelanjutan.
[23] Saxena, A., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., Twala, B., Singh, A., Montero, E. C., & Priyadarshi, N. (2023). Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010309
[24] Santos, C. et al. (2022). Nature-based solutions for icommunity resilience in Southeast Asia. Ecological Engineering.
[25] Schreier, M., Stamann, C., Janssen, M., Dahl, T., & Whittal, A. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis: Conceptualizations and Challenges in Research Practice-Introduction to the FQS Special Issue “Qualitative Content Analysis I” Special Issue 2. Trends and Topics in Qualitative Content Analysis 2.1 Development of QCA within the methodological landscape
[26] Setyowati, A., Pradana, A. P., & Rachmawati, D. (2021). The application of biopore infiltration holes as groundwater conservation efforts. Community Empowerment, 6(10), 1872–1879. https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.5600
[27] Social Mapping Kideco. (2024). LAPORAN PEMETAAN SOSIAL Area Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Perusahaan PT. KIDECO JAYA AGUNG 2024.
[28] Sustainability Report kideco. (2023). Meningkatkan Value dan Menjalin Sinergi Keberlanjutan 2023.
[29] Sustainability Report Kideco. (2024). Memperkuat Pondasi ESG untuk Membangun Masa Depan 2024.
[30] Wiati, C. B., Dharmawan, I. W. S., Sakuntaladewi, N., Ekawati, S., Wahyuni, T., Maharani, R., Hadiyan, Wiati, C. B., Dharmawan, I. W. S., Sakuntaladewi, N., Ekawati, S., Wahyuni, T., Maharani, R., Hadiyan, Y., Naibaho, Y., Satria, W. I., Ngatiman, N., Abdurachman, A., Karmilasanti, K., Laksmita, A. N., Angi, E. M., & Khadka, C. (2022). Challenges to and Strategies for the Climate Village Program Plus: A Lesson Learned from Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095530
[31] Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2022). Does ESG Performance Enhance Financial Flexibility? Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811324
[2] Annual Report Kideco. (2024). Annual Report Kideco 2024.
[3] Baba, M., & Suryani, S. (2023). Community-based climate adaptation practices in Indonesia’s ProKlim program. Environmental Research iand Public Policy, i2(1).
[4] Bamberger, M., Vaessen, J., & Raimondo, E. (2016). Dealing With Complexity in Development Evaluation: A Practical Approach. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399935
[5] Barker, C., & Murray, R. (2021). Co-Designing CSR for Social License: Evidence from Environmental Projects. Journal of Sustainability Engagement. E3S Web of Conferences, 250. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125006003
[6] Bascompta, M., Sanmiquel, L., Vintró, C., & Yousefian, M. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility Index for Mine Sites. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013570
[7] Colak, M., & Sarioglu, M. (2025). The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Quality of Integrated Reporting and ESG Risk Ratings. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114868
[8] Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed).
[9] Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone.
[10] Freeman, R. (1984). Freeman RE. Strategic Management, A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
[11] Hatry, H. (1999). Performance Measurement Getting Results.
[12] Jasi?ska, E., & Jasi?ski, M. (2022). Mining Industry Corporate Social Responsibility to Education Development. Resources, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11070065
[13] KLHK. (2016). Ministerial Regulation No. 84MENLHK2016 on ProKlim.
[14] Law No. 42009 & PP No. 782010 on Mining CSR. (2010). Law No. 42009 & PP No. 782010 on Mining CSR.
[15] Lincoln, Yvonna. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry.
[16] Lozano, R. (2015). A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325
[17] Matikainen, L. S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility programs in mining areas: insights form stakeholder groups in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2357675
[18] Moleong. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370561417
[19] Nurhasanah, M., Sanatosa, E., & Nugroho, S. (2023). Community-mediated mangrove rehabilitation via CSR: Lessons from coastal Java. Sustainability. Sustainability, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043456
[20] Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.
[21] Parsons, T. (1951). Talcott Parsons - The Social System (1951).
[22] OJK. (2017). SAL POJK 51 - keuangan berkelanjutan.
[23] Saxena, A., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., Twala, B., Singh, A., Montero, E. C., & Priyadarshi, N. (2023). Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010309
[24] Santos, C. et al. (2022). Nature-based solutions for icommunity resilience in Southeast Asia. Ecological Engineering.
[25] Schreier, M., Stamann, C., Janssen, M., Dahl, T., & Whittal, A. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis: Conceptualizations and Challenges in Research Practice-Introduction to the FQS Special Issue “Qualitative Content Analysis I” Special Issue 2. Trends and Topics in Qualitative Content Analysis 2.1 Development of QCA within the methodological landscape
[26] Setyowati, A., Pradana, A. P., & Rachmawati, D. (2021). The application of biopore infiltration holes as groundwater conservation efforts. Community Empowerment, 6(10), 1872–1879. https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.5600
[27] Social Mapping Kideco. (2024). LAPORAN PEMETAAN SOSIAL Area Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Perusahaan PT. KIDECO JAYA AGUNG 2024.
[28] Sustainability Report kideco. (2023). Meningkatkan Value dan Menjalin Sinergi Keberlanjutan 2023.
[29] Sustainability Report Kideco. (2024). Memperkuat Pondasi ESG untuk Membangun Masa Depan 2024.
[30] Wiati, C. B., Dharmawan, I. W. S., Sakuntaladewi, N., Ekawati, S., Wahyuni, T., Maharani, R., Hadiyan, Wiati, C. B., Dharmawan, I. W. S., Sakuntaladewi, N., Ekawati, S., Wahyuni, T., Maharani, R., Hadiyan, Y., Naibaho, Y., Satria, W. I., Ngatiman, N., Abdurachman, A., Karmilasanti, K., Laksmita, A. N., Angi, E. M., & Khadka, C. (2022). Challenges to and Strategies for the Climate Village Program Plus: A Lesson Learned from Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095530
[31] Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2022). Does ESG Performance Enhance Financial Flexibility? Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811324
Published
2025-11-07
Section
Original Articles
Copyright (c) 2025 Khariryan Arga, Liu Chao, Maria Ariesta Utha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
