Analisis Karakter dan Nilai-Nilai Generasi Z Terhadap Keanggotaan Serikat Pekerja di Perusahaan

  • Langga Lagandhy Politeknik Ketenagakerjaan
  • Rut Gloria Anugrah Politeknik Ketenagakerjaan
Keywords: Generation Z, trade unions, worker participation, industrial relations, work-life balance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the challenges and opportunities faced by trade unions in increasing the participation of Generation Z (Gen Z) as union members in companies. Gen Z, born between 1996-2012, has unique characteristics that differ from previous generations, including digital technology proficiency, high social awareness, and an orientation to work-life balance. The research method uses a qualitative approach with a case study at PT LEN Industri. The results of the study show that the main challenges faced by unions include the individualistic attitude of Gen Z, lack of effective socialization, and the negative stigma against unions as organizations that conflict with management. The study found that Gen Z tends to prioritize individual career development and avoid involvement in organizations that are perceived to hinder their career progress. Recommended strategies to increase Gen Z participation include: (1) effective digital socialization through social media platforms and webinars; (2) the implementation of a structured cadre regeneration program that focuses on the development of leadership skills; (3) anti-stigma campaigns with management to change negative perceptions; and (4) providing incentives in the form of training and skill development. This research makes a practical contribution to trade unions in designing recruitment strategies that are more adaptive and relevant to Gen Z's values and preferences, so that unions can maintain their relevance in the digital age and remain effective in fighting for workers' rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku
Asikin, Z., Wahab, A., Husni, L., & Asyhadie, Z. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perburuhan, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.
Frame, P., & Hartog, M. (2003). From rhetoric to reality. Into the swamp of ethical practice: implementing work-life balance. Into the Swamp of Ethical Practice: Implementing Work-Life Balance.
Husni, L. (2006). Pengantar hukum ketenagakerjaan Indonesia.
Nayak, A., & Pandey, M. (2015). Work-life balance and imbalance: A conceptual model.
Undang Undang
Undang Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2000 tentang Serikat Pekerja/Serikat Buruh.
Undang Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang.
Jurnal
A. Uwiyono, (1997), Pandangan Hukum dalam Upaya Mengatasi Konflik Ketenagakerjaan dalam Sistem Hubungan Industrial Pancasila, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, No.1, Tahun XXVII, 33-40.
Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of vocational behavior, 63(3), 510-531.
Kelliher, C., Richardson, J., & Boiarintseva, G. (2019). All of work? All of life? Reconceptualising work?life balance for the 21st century. Human resource management journal, 29(2), 97-112.
Prastiwi Mardijani, Partisipasi, (2010), Masyarakat terhadap Peningkatan Pembangunan Desa, Buletin Ekonomi, Vol.8, No.1, 1-8.
Published
2026-01-10