Reminiscing Coffee Culture in Adaptive Reuse Coffeeshop in Heritage Building, Euphoria or Sustainable?
Abstract
Coffee culture in Indonesia has progressively evolved into an urban lifestyle nowadays. The rapid growth of coffee shops aligns with Indonesias position as one of the worlds top five coffee-producing nations. Coffee consumption has surged by up to 250% through years 2014-2021 (International Coffee Organization,2021) and coffeeshops grew from 1083 to 2937 shops in 2016-2019. Amidst the pressures of urban development, land scarcity and evolving needs of contemporary society concerns, a paradigm shift has emerged, suggesting that commercial functions like coffee shops could repurpose old buildings, including heritage ones, instead of constructing anew. The adaptation of these structures merely known as adaptive reuse approach. However, the awareness among users regarding the importance of sustainable development, particularly in environmental, social, cultural, and economic aspects, remains a question. Is this trend a transient phase or a lasting shift in consciousness? This article reviews theories related to adaptive reuse, the growth of coffee shops within heritage buildings, and user perceptions of adaptive reuse coffee shops, with case study in Bandung City. Employing literature review, field observations, and questionnaire distributed to 99 participants, this study aims to ascertain consumers understanding of adaptive reuse concepts and how it influences consumers reasons for visiting these coffee shops. In conclusion, this study contributes to understanding consumer awareness of adaptive reuse in coffee shops and how this approach impacts consumer motivation visit. It sheds light on the evolving landscape of sustainable urban development within the context of cultural heritage and consumption lifestyle trends.
Downloads
References
Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439
Cole, R. J. (2012). Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.610608
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
du Plessis, C. (2012). Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.681540
Hayden, D. (1995). The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history. MIT Press.
https://coffeegeography.com/2023/05/24/annual-coffee-report-on-indonesia-2023/ (accessed 29th September 2023)
https://dataindonesia.id/agribisnis-kehutanan/detail/volume-penjualan-kopi-siap-minum-indonesia-naik-32-pada-2022 (accessed 28th September 2023)
https://dataindonesia.id/Sektor%20Riil/detail/daftar-8-negara-penghasil-kopi-terbesar-di-dunia-pada-20222023 (accessed 28th September 2023)
https://elibrary.unikom.ac.id/id/eprint/6144/7/UNIKOM_Srifana%20Suharlin_Bab%20I.pdf (accessed 30th September 2023)
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20230306112229-128-419154/kopi-kekinian-menjamur-produksi-kopi-ri-naik-120-ribu-ton (accessed 30th September 2023)
Langston, C., Wong, F. K. W., Hui, E. C. M., & Shen, L. Y. (2008). Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 43(10), 1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017
Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006). Possible geographies: A passing encounter in a café. Area, 38(4), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00701.x
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). Springer.
Lyle, J. T. (1996). Regenerative design for sustainable development. John Wiley & Sons.
Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Wiley.
Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2012). Designing from place: A regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.621341
Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2020). Regenerative development and design. In Sustainable built environment (pp. 115–141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0684-1_303
Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.01.002
Mohammed, N., & Alauddin, K. (2016). The criteria for decision making in adaptive reuse towards sustainable development. MATEC Web of Conferences, 66, 00092. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600092
Online source:
Ozorhon, B., & Oral, K. (2016). Drivers of regeneration projects in historic urban districts: Cases from Istanbul. Habitat International, 56, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.04.001
Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2011). Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cultural heritage: A literature review. In Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XII (Vol. 118, pp. 155–164). WIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2495/STR110131
Redman, C. L. (2014). Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits? Ecology and Society, 19(2), 37. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06390-190237
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
UNESCO. (2013). New life for historic cities: The historic urban landscape approach explained. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Copyright (c) 2026 Mila Andria Savitri, Imam Santosa, Deny Willy Junaidy, Yuni Maharani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
