Regional Digital Citizenship Caused by Conflict: Building Identity in the Seablings–Knetz Conflict in the Asean Digital Public

  • Rachma Tri Widuri Politeknik Tempo
  • Layla Eva Kalyana Politeknik Tempo
  • Muhammad Nur Hidayat Politeknik Tempo
Keywords: Regional Digital Citizenship, Digital Identity Construction, Social Identity Theory, Networked Publics, ASEAN, Digital Conflict

Abstract

While digital citizenship has traditionally been framed within national boundaries, it has been overlooked that digital interaction fosters a sense of transnational belonging. In this study, we will introduce the concept of regional digital citizenship (RDC) so that digital communication that has created conflict can encourage the emergence of regional identities that transcend the nation. This study aims to develop the concept of RDC and explore how conflict-based digital interactions shape regional identities through cross-border engagement. It uses the SEAblingsKNetz conflict on Twitter (X) and Threads as a case study. A qualitative event-based case study was used to analyze a 72-hour peak escalation period with intensive interaction between users in Southeast Asia. This study examines the processes involved using social identity theory, network identity perspectives, and emotional public theory. The analysis identified four sequential mechanisms: activation of identity superiority, boundary building, cross-border network alignment, and emotional reinforcement. These processes have built a shared digital identity in Southeast Asia that goes beyond countries. This study shows that a sense of belonging to the community emerges through bottom-up communication practices rather than institutional frameworks. By reconceptualizing digital citizenship as discursively executed and conflict-driven, this study expands the theory of digital citizenship beyond the state model and provides an analytical framework for studying the formation of supranational identities in digitally mediated contexts. The RDC will provide a foundation for future research on cross-border solidarity and regional identity building in the global digital publics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Castells, M. (2018). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Hilbert, M. (2019). The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestic broadband internet access rates remain stagnant. Telecommunications Policy, 43(6), 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.10.006

International Telecommunication Union. (2022). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2022. https://www.itu.int

Jiang, Q., Chen, Z., Zhang, Z., & Zuo, C. (2023). Investigating links between internet literacy, internet use, and internet addiction among Chinese youth and adolescents in the digital age. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1233303.

Kemp, S. (2021). Digital 2021: Global overview report. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com

Lobato, R. (2019). Netflix nations: The geography of digital distribution. NYU Press.

Lotz, A. D. (2021). Media disrupted: Surviving pirates, cannibals, and streaming wars. MIT Press.

Napoli, P. M. (2019). Social media and the public interest: Media regulation in the disinformation age. Columbia University Press.

Papacharissi, Z. (2024). Elements of practices in digital publics: A model for identifying collective doings on social media platforms. Communication Theory.

Statista. (2022). Advertising revenue distribution by media in Asia. https://www.statista.com

van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.

World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1457-0

Xia, L., Baghaie, S., & Sajadi, S. M. (2024). The digital economy: Challenges and opportunities in the new era of technology and electronic communications. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(2), 102411.

Published
2026-04-17