Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia p�ISSN:
2541-0849
e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol. 7, No. 11, November 2022
AN
ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN STUDENTS� WRITING: A CASE STUDY OF ECONOMICS
DEPARTMENT STUDENTS BATCH 2022 CLASS E
Sri Ani Puji Setiawati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Indonesia
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Writing is regarded as the most difficult skill to
acquire because, according to Harmer (2004:31) cited in Wati & Nursyaebah
(2017), learners frequently have more time to reflect when writing than they do
during spoken activities. In order to help them, students can use dictionaries,
grammar books, and other reference materials to help them activate their
brains. He advised consulting grammar books to ensure that the work was
grammatically correct because he thought grammar was crucial in writing. As a
result, the main goal of this research is to examine students' writing,
particularly their grammatical errors. The six categories of grammatical errors
are verb agreement (Leech, 1985), capitalization (Oshima, 1988), use, sentence
structure (Ross, 1975), pronoun and spelling (Brooks, 1964), according to Wati
and Nursyaebah (2017). Based on student writing mistake analyses, the data were
examined. According to the research findings, students usually made mistakes
with verb agreement (34.8%), which they accomplished by employing the wrong
form of the simple present. They also frequently made mistakes with
capitalization (17.4%), spelling (17.4%), usage (13%), sentence structure
(8.7%), and pronoun errors (8.7%). As a result of the findings, it is
recommended that teachers revisit their lessons on verb agreement,
capitalization, and spelling, which are the three areas where pupils
consistently fail when writing.
Keywords:
Grammatical Errors, Writing, Students.
Introduction
In
recent years, writing has become a crucial aspect of academic and professional
communication. Writing is viewed as a complex and challenging activity for many
students; teachers should focus on the grammatical concepts essential for clear
communication of meaning (Chin, 2000). In the context of higher education,
students are expected to produce written assignments that demonstrate their
understanding of course material and showcase their critical thinking skills.
However, despite the importance placed on writing in academia, many students
struggle with producing grammatically correct sentences. This is particularly
true for non-native speakers of English who may face challenges due to
differences between their native language and English grammar rules.
Writing
is a genuine challenge faced by teachers in ESL classrooms (Zerin, 2007).
Writing and grammar cannot be separated each other because grammatical rules
are one of aspects that the learners should consider before they write
something. Grammar mastery is very important in writing skill, it can help the
students to produce good sentences. According to Swan (1998: 19) cited in
(Khairunisa, A., Nadrun, 2018), �grammar is the rule that says how words are
changed to show different meaning, and they combine into sentences�. It means
grammar is a way in forming a different meaning of words which use to construct
a sentence in writing. Grammar is viewed as the most essential aspect of
language learning for second language learners (Singh et al, 2017). Through detailed studies of
student writing, Shaughnessy (1977) concludes that the best grammar instruction
is that which gives the greatest return for the least investment of time.
Grammatical errors can occur at any level of
proficiency and may be caused by various factors such as lack of familiarity
with the rules or structural differences between languages. Errors can range
from minor mistakes like punctuation errors to more complex issues such as
subject-verb agreement or tense inconsistencies.
One of the most popular theories of second
language acquisition is error analysis. By comparing the learners' acquired
norms with the norms of the target language and explaining the discovered
faults, it is concerned with the examination of the errors made by L2 learners
(James, 1988). Error analysis, according to Crystal (1999, p. 108), is the
study of the inappropriate forms that someone learning a language, particularly
a foreign language, produces. EA refers to "the study of linguistic
ignorance, the investigation of what people do not know and how they attempt to
cope with their ignorance," according to James (2001, p. 62).
There
are six elements typical errors, such as: verb agreement it is about matching
in number and person of subject, capitalization is the first letter of a word,
usage is about articles, plural-singular form, and proposition, sentence
pattern is the basic sentence pattern of English is subject + verb + object/complement,
pronoun is about a pronoun represents a person, place, thing, or idea without naming
it and the last is spelling it is about relatively minor importance as far as
reading is concerned (Brooks, 1964:168; Leech and Svartvik, 1984:153; Oshima
and Hogue, 1988:7; Ross and Doty, 1975:5) in Sadiah, S., & Royani, S. A. (2019).
Research
Method
Sugiyono
(2010) stated that descriptive research is research to determine the value of
independent variables without making comparisons or connecting with other
variables. The goal of descriptive research is to describe a phenomenon and its
characteristics, this research is more concerned with what rather than how or
why something has happened. Therefore, observation and survey tools are often
used to gather data (Gall & Borg, 2007, cited in Nassaji, 2015).
The
entire research was conducted using a qualitative methodology. A case study
enables a thorough inquiry that focuses on a complete understanding of the
specific phenomenon of a study and various characteristics of the population in
question (Kaufman & Kaufman, 2004). An extensive investigation of the
intervention's classroom context was made possible by using a case study
research approach, which also made it easier to describe the intervention
itself (Ganapathy & Kaur, 2013). This case study examined the grammatical
errors that ESL students made.
In
collecting data, the writer only used writing assignment in the form of
paragraph writing test of Economics department students batch 2022 Class E. The
total number of students are 25 students. The data are analyzed by using
grammatical error or to the process of determining incidence, nature, cause and
consequences of unsuccessful language (James, 1998:1; Brooks, 1964:168; Leech
and Svartvik, 1984:153; Oshima and Hogue, 1988:7; Ross and Doty, 1975:5) in Sadiah, S., & Royani, S. A. (2019).
Result
And Discussion
The
recapitulation of students� errors are displayed into chart. The chart covers
the highest to the lowest rank as follows:
∑% = |
F |
X 100% |
|
||
N |
Using the
following formula, then the description of above data can be seen in the
following paragraphs.
Note:
∑ = Symbol of percentage
F = Frequency of the occurences of each request strategy
N = Total number of request strategy
The
chart explains the kinds of errors that students made. The writer would like to
elaborate the result of the chart above from the highest error number until the
lowest rank. Most of students made error in verb agreement, there are 43 or
41%. The writers assume that the students did errors in correlation between
subject and verb. The errors in pronoun are 19 or 18%, usages are 16 or 15%,
sentence pattern are 13 or 12%, spelling error are 9 or 9%, and capitalization
error are 5 or 5%. The data from the students collected, then analyzed the
errors by using classify the error, and quantify the error. These steps are
proposed by Gass and Selinker (1994:66).
Moreover,
to know the result of students� grammatical errors, the writer made the table
of students� grammatical errors as follows:
Table 1
The
Recapitulation of Students� Grammatical Error Types of Grammatical Errors |
|||||||
Student |
Vb. Agreement |
Capitalization |
Usage |
Sentence Pattern |
Pronoun |
Spelling |
Total |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
14 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
16 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
18 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
20 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
23 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
Total |
40 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
115 |
Percentage
of Error |
34.8% |
17.4% |
13% |
8.7% |
8.7% |
17.4% |
100% |
1. Verb
Agreement
Based
on the results here are the errors 34.8% in verb agreement that made by
students. They are� students number 3-4-6-8-10-11-13-18-20-23-25.
Examples:
Table 2
�Verb Agreement Errors
Incorrect
Sentence |
Correct
Sentence |
||
1. |
The
economic condition in Indonesia have changed to a better
condition than a couple years ago. |
1. |
The
economic condition in Indonesia has changed to a better
condition than a couple years ago. |
2. |
The
recession may brings global impacts. |
2. |
The
recession may bring global impacts. |
3. |
A
lot of customers was disappointed with the new policies. |
3. |
A
lot of customers were disappointed with the new policies. |
In
these sentences, the students still confused about plural or singular subject
related with the verb. In No.1 sentence, the subjects he/she/it should use has,
not have. In No.2, subjects she/he/it, the modal may should be
followed with base form verb, bring. Whereas in No.3, since the subject
is plural, the to be used in the sentence should be were, not was.
2. Capitalization
Some
students made errors in capitalizing some letters as many as 17.4%. They are
students number 1, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19, 21, 23, and 25. Examples:
Table 3
Capitalization Errors
Incorrect
Sentence |
Correct
Sentence |
||
1. |
The
Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of Indonesia, nadiem
Makarim, stated that the youth should have experiences in entrepreneurship. |
1. |
The
Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of Indonesia, Nadiem
Makarim, stated that the youth should have experiences in entrepreneurship. |
2. |
the Central Bank of the Indonesia is called Bank Indonesia. |
2. |
The Central Bank of the Indonesia is called Bank Indonesia. |
In sentence No.1,
student should use a capital letter for a person�s name. In No.2, a new
sentence should be started using a capital letter, too.
3. Usage
Usage
areas are article and preposition. The writer found 13% that students number 1,
2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, 22, and 25 used inappropriate preposition and article
in the sentences. Below are some examples from the data:
Table 4
Usage Errors
Incorrect
Sentence |
Correct
Sentence |
||
1. |
Indonesia
unemployment rate for 2019 was
3.62%, an 0.78% decline from 2018. |
1. |
Indonesia
unemployment rate for 2019 was
3.62%, a 0.78% decline from 2018. |
2. |
The international economics summit will be conducted
17 July 2023. |
2. |
The international economics summit will be
conducted on 17 July 2023. |
�The students made errors in the way using
article an. It is supposed to a. In sentence No.2, before
mentioning date, it is supposed to use on.
4. Sentence
Pattern
And the fourth
error 8.7% that writer found in students� number 3, 9, 13, 17, and 22 sentences
was sentence pattern, example:
Table 5
Sentence Pattern
Incorrect
Sentence |
Correct
Sentence |
||
1. |
Many
students are like Economics. |
1. |
Many
students like Economics. |
2. |
Adam Smith is economist famous
in world. |
2. |
Adam Smith is famous economist
in the world. |
The
errors made by the students in the above sentences are the pattern of the
sentences. In sentence No.1, with the subject Many students, the
predicate should be like, not are like. Whereas in
sentence No.2, the economist famous is incorrect. The correct form is famous
economist. Furthermore, in the word world, it should use article the
before it.
5. Pronoun
The
fifth error was pronoun, the writer found 8.7% that many students number 2, 10,
14, 19, 1nd 24 did not use appropriate pronoun, examples:
Table 6
Pronoun
Incorrect
Sentence |
Correct
Sentence |
||
1. |
Adam
Smith is my favourite economist. She is very famour all
over the world. |
1. |
Adam
Smith is my favourite economist. He is very famour all
over the world. |
2. |
Sri Mulyani said that the supplies of rice
will be enough until next month. He added that people no
need to be worried. |
2. |
Sri Mulyani said that the supplies of rice
will be enough until next month. She added that people
no need to be worried. |
Some students
still make errors in the using of pronoun in their sentences as listed in the
above table.
6. Spelling
The last but not least error was spelling,
as Brooks (1964:168, cited in Wati & Nursyaebah, 2017) noted that �Spelling
is of relatively minor importance as far as reading is concerned; it becomes a
major factor in the productive skill writing�. Therefore, it is important to
spell the words correctly. Errors 17.4% made by students number 1, 2, 4, 5, 7,
8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 25. Examples:
Table
7
Spelling
Incorrect
Sentence |
Correct
Sentence |
||
1. |
The
supplay and demand are equal. |
1. |
The
supply and demand are equal. |
2. |
Unemployment may effect
poverty in a country. |
2. |
Unemployment may affect
poverty in a country. |
It can be
concluded that the students cannot write the words correctly. Therefore, it can
be found many spelling errors. The writer believes it is caused by the limited
of vocabularies mastery.
According
to the data described above, it can be inferred that, out of the six categories
of grammatical errors�verb agreement, capitalization, usage, sentence pattern,
pronoun, and spelling�the writer discovered that students made the most verb
agreement errors, accounting for 40 or 34.8% of all errors. As a result,
teachers should focus more on subject and verb agreement in order to reduce the
number of grammar mistakes that pupils make in their writing.
Chin, B. A.
(2000). The role of grammar in improving students� writing. Sadlier: Oxford.
Crystal, D. (1999). The penguin dictionary
of language (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books.
Ganapathy, M. & Kaur, S. (2014). ESL
students� perceptions of the use of higher order thinking skills in English
language writing. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(5), 80-87.
James, C. (2001). Errors in language
learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching
and Research Press
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L.
(2004). Kaufman assessment battery for children (2nd ed.) (K-ABC-II).Circle
Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Nassaji,
H. (2015). Qualitative And Descriptive Research:
Data Type Versus Data Analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129�132.
Sadiah, S.,
& Royani, S. A. (2019). An Analysis of Grammatical Errors in Students'
Writing Descriptive Text. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(6),
764-770.
Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and
expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Singh, C.
K. S., Singh, A. K. J., Razak, N. Q. A., & Ravinthar, T. (2017). Grammar
Errors Made by ESL Tertiary Students in Writing. English Language
Teaching, 10(5), 16-27.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian
Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. [Indonesian]
Wati, A., & Nursyaebah. (2017). No
Title. An Analysis Of Grammatical Errors
In Student� Writing Recount Text, 102. Jawa Timur:
English Education Department.
Zerin, S. (2007). Teaching writing to
young learners. BRAC University.
Copyright holder: Sri Ani Puji
Setiawati (2022) |
First publication right: Syntax Literate:
Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia |
This article is licensed under: |