Syntax
Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia p�ISSN: 2541-0849 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol. 8, No.
12, Desember 2023
PREVALENCE
AND CAUSE OF CHILDHOOD BLINDNESS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Akbal
Nur Karim1, Agung Santosa2
1General Practitioner,
Faculty of Medicine, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Indonesia
2Department of
Opthalmology Sartika Asih Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
Childhood blindness is defined as a group of
eye diseases occurring in childhood or early adolescence. Good parental
knowledge of childhood blindness is important for early detection and
management of the lifelong burden. The aim: This study aims to provide an
explanation and prevent children with blindness and visual impairment Methods:
By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show
that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure
that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search
approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into
account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub,
were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces,
works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 1751
articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 120 articles.
The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total
of 11 articles for PubMed and 8 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a
total of 5 papers, 4 of which came from PubMed and 1 of which came from SagePub.
We included five research that met the criteria. Conclusion: The causes of
childhood blindness from the available blind school studies revealed that
causes of childhood blindness have mainly shifted from corneal causes to whole
globe abnormalities.
Keywords: Children Blindness, Prevalence, Cause
Introduction
Childhood blindness (CHB) is a public health concern across
the world. Global estimates on childhood blindness show that around 1.42
million and 17.52 million children are suffering from blindness and moderate to
severe visual impairment, respectively. Almost three-quarters of these live in
low�middle-income countries where the prevalence is reported to be as high as
1.5 per 1000 children in contrast to high-income countries where the prevalence
is 0.3 per 1000 (Wadhwani et al., 2021).
Blindness refers to a
lack of vision which may happen suddenly or over some time due to many reasons
while WHO defined blindness as presenting visual acuity worse than 3/60 in the
better eye. Its causes vary from region to region and from country to country.
The causes of blindness have been either avoidable with prevention and
treatment or unavoidable. However, the highest percentage of avoidable
blindness has been corresponding to low-income and middle-income countries like
Ethiopia. So, timely information is crucial to design strategies that address
the life quality of sightless individuals (Markos, Kefyalew, &
Tesfaye, 2022).
Blindness in children
leads to a deep impact on the psychological, emotional, and socioeconomic
growth of the family. A child with blindness is more likely to have delays in
developmental milestones, be more frequently hospitalized, and die during
childhood than a sighted child. Such severe vision loss also adversely affects
educational activities, orientation, and mobility from the early stage of life
resulting in a lack of employment privilege. These differential characteristics
between a sighted and nonsighted child are more obvious in developing
countries. Moreover, the disability-adjusted life years (DALY) loss in a blind
child is far more than that of adults with blindness (Gudlavalleti, 2017).
Childhood blindness
has a great impact at the individual level, with a negative effect on personal
development and educational performance, placing an economic burden on the
family and the country at large (Assefa, Tolessa, &
Ferede, 2020). According to the primary health care strategy of the WHO, the first
aim is health promotion by providing health education targeting mothers and
women of childbearing age, teachers, and religious and community leaders.
Adequate early childhood interventions are essential for detecting eye health
problems in children and providing timely treatment to prevent the consequence
of the development of amblyopia and irreversible lifelong blindness (Borrel, Dabideen, Mekonen,
& Overland, 2013).
In most of the
initiatives aiming to prevent childhood blindness, information regarding the
knowledge held by parents and caregivers about childhood blindness is essential
(Pawar et al., 2023). Since children, especially preverbal ones, cannot
complain of poor vision, it is up to the parents and caregivers to detect it
and ensure that children receive the help they need (Ramai & Pulisetty,
2013).
Even though childhood blindness is considered a priority in
the WHO there have been limited studies conducted regarding childhood blindness
in the study area. By considering the critical role of parents and caregivers
in the early detection of childhood blindness, studies should be conducted to
assess the level of knowledge of childhood blindness. Therefore, this study
aimed to estimate the level of parents' or guardians' knowledge of childhood
blindness. The results may be beneficial to health authorities to enable them
to plan strategies for the prevention of childhood blindness.
Research Methods
Protocol
By following the rules provided by Preferred Reporting
Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, the author of this
study made certain that it was up to par with the requirements. This is done to
ensure that the conclusions drawn from the inquiry are accurate.
Criteria for Eligibility
For this literature review, we compare and contrast the
prevalence and cases of childhood blindness. This is done to provide an
explanation and improve the handling of treatment and the prevention of
blindness in childhood. The main purpose of this paper is to show the relevance
of the difficulties that have been identified as a whole.
For researchers to take part in the study, they needed to
fulfill the following requirements: 1) The paper needs to be written in
English. For the manuscript to be considered for publication, it needs to meet
both of these requirements. 2) The studied papers include several that were
published after 2013, but before the period that this systematic review deems
to be relevant. Examples of studies that are not permitted include editorials,
submissions that do not have a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), review articles
that have already been published, and entries that are essentially identical to
journal papers that have already been published.
Search Strategy
We used "prevalence childhood blindness�;
�cause of childhood blindness� as keywords. The search for studies to be
included in the systematic review was carried out using the PubMed and SagePub databases
by inputting the words: ("epidemiology"[MeSH Subheading] OR
"epidemiology"[All Fields] OR "prevalence"[All Fields] OR
"prevalence"[MeSH Terms] OR "prevalence"[All Fields] OR
"prevalences"[All Fields] OR "prevalence s"[All Fields] OR
"prevalent"[All Fields] OR "prevalently"[All Fields] OR
"prevalent"[All Fields]) AND ("childhood"[All Fields] OR
"childhoods"[All Fields]) AND ("blindness"[MeSH Terms] OR
"blindness"[All Fields] OR "blindnesses"[All Fields]) used
in searching the literature.
Data retrieval
After reading the abstract and the title of each study, the
writers examined to determine whether or not the study satisfied the inclusion
criteria. The writers then decided which previous research they wanted to
utilize as sources for their article and selected those studies. After looking
at several different research, which all seemed to point to the same trend,
this conclusion was drawn. All submissions need to be written in English and
can't be seen anywhere else.
Figure 1 Article search flowchart
Only those papers that were able to satisfy all of the
inclusion criteria were taken into consideration for the systematic review.
This reduces the number of results to only those that are pertinent to the
search. We do not take into consideration the conclusions of any study that
does not satisfy our requirements. After this, the findings of the research
will be analyzed in great detail. The following pieces of information were
uncovered as a result of the inquiry that was carried out for this study:
names, authors, publication dates, location, study activities, and parameters.
Quality Assessment and Data Synthesis
Each author did their study on the research that was
included in the publication's title and abstract before deciding on which
publications to explore further. The next step will be to evaluate all of the
articles that are suitable for inclusion in the review because they match the
criteria set forth for that purpose in the review. After that, we'll determine
which articles to include in the review depending on the findings that we've
uncovered.
This criterion is utilized in the process of selecting
papers for further assessment. to simplify the process as much as feasible when
selecting papers to evaluate. Which earlier investigations were carried out,
and what elements of those studies made it appropriate to include them in the
review, are being discussed here.
Results and Discussion
In the PubMed database, the
results of our search brought up 1751 articles, whereas the results of our
search on SagePub brought up 120 articles. The results of the search conducted
for the last year of 2013 yielded a total of 11 articles for PubMed and 8
articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 5 papers, 4 of which
came from PubMed and 1 of which came from SagePub. We included five research
that met the criteria.
����������� Yahalom,
(2022) showed that the leading cause of
childhood visual impairment and blindness was Inflammatory Eye Disease (IED).
Analyses of the literature from the last two decades show that IEDs are a major
cause of SVI/childhood blindness in other developed countries as well. Updated
patterns of global childhood blindness may suggest a need for a new approach to
screening programs and modern tactics for prevention.
����������� Cherinet, (2018) showed that low vision and
blindness found in this study were high. Age, cataracts, glaucoma, and
age-related macular degeneration were significantly associated with low vision
and blindness. This amount of magnitude will be reduced if prevention, early
diagnosis, and management are targeted toward avoidable causes of visual
impairment. Wadhwani, (2021) showed that optic nerve abnormalities were the
most important cause of blindness in children. Refractive error is the most
important cause of visual impairment amongst children and needs to be addressed
(Philip
et al., 2021).
Table 1. The literature included in this
study
Author |
Origin |
Method |
Sample |
Result |
Yahalom
(2022) |
Israel |
Retrospective
study |
1393 |
A total of 1393 children
aged 0�18 years were included in the study. Moderate visual impairment was
seen in 1025 (73.6%) and SVI/blindness in 368 (26.4%) of the studied
children. Among blind children, IED accounted for at least 51% of all
diagnoses, including mainly albinism and retinal dystrophies. IED prevalence
was equally high in both main ethnic groups (Jewish and Arab Muslims).
Non-IED (22.6%) included mainly patients with cerebral visual impairment and
retinopathy of prematurity. |
Cherinet,
(2018) |
Ethiopia |
Retrospective study |
881 patients |
A total of 881 subjects with a response rate of 97.4%
were selected. The mean age of the study subjects was 44.53(SD: � 21.85)
with a range of 1�100 years. The prevalence of low vision and blindness was
91 (10.3% (95% CI: 8.2, 12.3)), and 64 (7.3 95%CI: 5.7, 9.0)) respectively.
Age (p-value < 0.001), cataract (p-value = 0.002),
glaucoma (p-value = 0.002), and age-related macular
degeneration (p-value < 0.001) were significantly associated
with low vision and blindness. |
Wadhwani
(2021) |
North
India |
Cross-Sectional
Study |
789
patients |
Amongst 20,955 children examined for visual acuity,
a total of 789 children were referred to the central clinic for detailed
ophthalmic examination. Of these referred children, a total of 124 had
presented visual acuity <6/18 in the better eye. The prevalence of visual
impairment (VI) was 5.92 per thousand (95% CI: 4.96-7.05). The prevalence of
moderate to severe visual impairment was maximum in the age group of 11 to 15
years. The main cause of avoidable VI in these children was a refractive
error (75.7%). The prevalence of blindness was 0.42 per thousand. |
Hashemi
(2018) |
Iran |
Cross-Sectional Study |
3132 patients |
Of the 4453 selected persons, 3132 (70.4%)
participated in the study. The prevalence of visual impairment based on
presenting vision and best-corrected vision was 3.95% (95% confidence
interval [CI]: 3.13�4.77) and 2.23 (95% CI: 1.54�2.91), respectively. The
prevalence of presenting visual impairment increased from 1.59% in children
under 5 years of age to 43.59% in people older than 65 years of age; these
figures were respectively 1.59% and 42.31% based on corrected visual acuity.
In the logistic regression model, older age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI:
1.04�1.07, P < 0.001), higher education
(OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06�0.38, P < 0.001),
and low income (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.21�1.72, P <
0.001) correlated with impaired sight. Based on presenting vision and
best-corrected vision, the prevalence of blindness was 0.86% (95% CI:
0.51�1.22) and 0.32% (95% CI: 0.1�0.55). The most common causes of visual
impairment were uncorrected refractive error (41.8%) and cataracts (20%). |
Heijthuijsen,
(2013) |
Rep
of Suriname |
Cross-Sectional
Study |
4610
patients |
65 children were identified with SVI/BL, 58.5% were
blind and 41.5% were severely visually impaired (SVI). The major anatomical
site of SVI/BL was the retina at 33.8%, the lens at 15.4%, and the
normal-appearing globe at 15.4%. The major underlying etiology of SVI/BL was
undetermined in 56.9% (mainly cataract and abnormality since birth) and
perinatal factors in 21.5% (mainly retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)).
Avoidable causes of SVI/BL accounted for 40% of cases; 7.7% were preventable
and 32.3% were treatable with cataracts and ROP the most common causes (15.4%
and 12.3%, respectively). |
Hashemi, et al8 (2018) showed
that the prevalence of visual impairment was intermediate in comparison with
other studies. The prevalence of visual impairment in our study was similar to
the global average; however, it was markedly high at older ages. Nonetheless,
refractive errors and cataracts remain the main causes of impaired vision and
blindness in this population, while these two conditions are easily treatable
with correction or surgery.
Heijthuijsen, (2013) showed that
more than a third of the SVI/BL causes are potentially avoidable, with
childhood cataracts and ROP the leading causes. Corneal scarring from vitamin A
deficiency does not seem to be a continuing issue in Suriname.
Discussion
Globally, an estimated 36 million
people live with blindness. In terms of the prevalence of blindness by age
distribution, around 1.4 million children aged 0�14 years are currently living
with blindness, whereas approximately 17.5 million are at risk of developing
low vision. The estimated burden associated with blindness among children is 70
million blind person-years. Although the actual number of blind children is
much lower than that of blind adults, the number of blind years resulting from
blindness is alarmingly high in children, and this has an immense social and
economic impact (Bourne
et al., 2017).
The magnitude and causes of
visual impairment and blindness vary by region, owing to socio-developmental
diversification. Analyses of global data showed that around 90% of blind people
reside in developing countries. Few population-based studies in recent times
have investigated the prevalence as well as factors responsible for childhood
blindness in the context of developing countries.
However, it has been observed
that the burden of childhood blindness is higher in the African and Asian
regions, predominantly because of inaccessibility to primary healthcare
services. A majority of the causes of childhood blindness are avoidable even in
the minimal resource settings of developing countries (Alswailmi,
2018).
Although WHO uses the definition
of best-corrected vision of <3/60 in the better eye for defining blindness
and a best-corrected vision of <6/18 to define visual impairment, this tends
to ignore uncorrected refractive errors as an important cause of visual
impairment in children. Due to this, WHO has changed the definitions to
presenting visual acuity instead of best corrected to define visual impairment
and blindness with the same cutoffs.
However, studies targeted towards
refractive error have suggested that presenting visual acuity of <6/12 in
the better eye may be a more appropriate criterion for defining visual
impairment in children as good vision in a child is essential for learning and
sports (Saxena,
Vashist, Singh, & Tandon, 2015). Childhood blindness can be
categorized as preventable and curable. Preventable causes include corneal
scars due to vitamin A deficiency, injuries, etc., while curable causes include
pediatric cataracts, glaucoma, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), refractive
errors, etc. ABC includes both preventable and curable causes.
Dandona et al. showed that
treatable refractive error caused 33.3% of blindness, followed by 16.6% due to
preventable causes (8.3% each due to vitamin A deficiency and amblyopia after
cataract surgery). The important causes of visual disability in children have
shown a shift over the past two decades and interventions like the provision of
good nutrition, vitamin supplementation, and universal immunization have led to
a reduction in the incidence of keratomalacia, measles infection, trachoma,
pediatric corneal infections, and conditions amenable to primary prevention.
The newer challenges include
adolescent refractive error, cataracts, ROP, and consequences of ocular trauma. Currently most interventions in
controlling childhood blindness are hospital-based. More appropriate
interventions would be ones targeted towards whole communities or children
within the population so that the intervention yields results not only for an individual
but for the whole community.
Studies have shown that childhood
blindness is a greater concern in children in rural and less developed areas
and children in urban slums where such targeted interventions can have a
greater impact yet have poor healthcare infrastructure. In communities with
high levels of childhood blindness due to preventable corneal scar, the focus
should be to encourage the consumption of vitamin A-rich foods and 6 monthly
vitamin A supplementation for all children between 9 months and 5 years of age and
discourage traditional topical medicines and using medicines without proper
prescription.
Encouraging SAFE strategy: This
is part of the International Trachoma Initiative (ITI) that aims at the
elimination of blinding trachoma, the most common cause of preventable
blindness. It involves measures to improve personal hygiene, environmental sanitation,
water supplies, availability of antibiotics to combat trachoma, and surgery for
managing complications of trachoma.
There is a need to increase
awareness in the population about ways to prevent children from ocular
injuries. Provide education about risks in contact sports, especially with
projectile games, for example, cricket, gulli danda, and BB guns, avoiding
high-risk behavior in festivals that result in eye injuries from firecrackers,
bow and arrows, holi balloons, and colors that cause chemical burns and ways to
childproofing the home.12
Instead of having vertical
eyecare programs under the National Programme for the Control of Blindness,
they should be integrated with the existing Mother and Child Care and school
health programs to increase coverage and acceptability. Incorporate the School
Eye Screening Programme as a part of a comprehensive child care program that
also targets the overall growth and development of a child.
This should focus on vision,
hearing, nutrition, cleanliness, and hygiene along with encouraging sports and
physical activity. The current focus of the school eye program on only
refractive errors limits its utility. School-going children are very receptive
in school and interacting with children in schools provides a unique
opportunity for health education and to increase awareness about healthy
lifestyles. It can have a positive impact on the child, his/her siblings, and
parents at home.
Most services in the community
are designed for adults and are extended to children. As a child is not a small
adult, a holistic, child-centered approach involving the parents, caregivers,
Anganwadi workers, and teachers is essential. As the prevalence of childhood
blindness is low, plan services for a population of 10 million people to reduce
overall cost, and improve feasibility is very important to intervene early if
the child has a preventable or treatable disease.
Delayed treatment is not only
less effective, but also as the immature visual system of the child may develop
permanent visual loss due to amblyopia, outcomes remain poor even though
appropriate intervention is done at a later stage. Currently, the child
accesses the health service when a problem is identified, parents/caregivers
have time and resources to access a health facility and the accessible facility
can cater to the need.
We have to be much more proactive
in finding children who need treatment (e.g., by using local key informants).
The services must be made affordable so that cost is not a barrier to early
referral. Health education for mothers is crucial and they should know how to
prevent potentially blinding conditions and where they should go if their child
has a problem. It is important to educate and train medical undergraduates and
allied medical professionals about preventable eye disorders and managing
ocular emergencies.
Most residency programs for
ophthalmology do not have a component of pediatric ophthalmology and developing
and emphasizing this subspecialty and exposure to managing pediatric eye
problems is essential. Information about preventing and managing eye disorders
should be integral to any community medicine training and service delivery.
Conclusion
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alswailmi, Farhan Khashim. (2018). Global prevalence
and causes of visual impairment with special reference to the general
population of Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 34(3),
751.
Assefa,
Natnael Lakachew, Tolessa, Kalkidan Getahun, & Ferede, Ayanaw Tsega.
(2020). Knowledge of childhood blindness and associated factors among parents
or guardians in Maksegnit Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Clinical Optometry,
175�182.
Borrel,
Annalies, Dabideen, Reshma, Mekonen, YEHUALASHET, & Overland, L. (2013).
Child eye health in Africa. The Status and Way Forward. The African Child
Policy Forum Cape Town, South Africa: ORBIS Africa.
Bourne,
Rupert R. A., Flaxman, Seth R., Braithwaite, Tasanee, Cicinelli, Maria V, Das,
Aditi, Jonas, Jost B., Keeffe, Jill, Kempen, John H., Leasher, Janet, &
Limburg, Hans. (2017). Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the
global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 5(9),
e888�e897.
Cherinet,
Fashe Markos, Tekalign, Sophia Yoseph, Anbesse, Dereje Hayilu, & Bizuneh,
Zewdu Yenegeta. (2018). Prevalence and associated factors of low vision and
blindness among patients attending St. Paul�s Hospital Millennium Medical
College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmology, 18, 1�6.
Gudlavalleti,
Venkata S. Murthy. (2017). Magnitude and temporal trends in avoidable blindness
in children (ABC) in India. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 84,
924�929.
Hashemi,
Hassan, Khabazkhoob, Mehdi, Saatchi, Mohammad, Ostadimoghaddam, Hadi, &
Yekta, Abbasali. (2018). Visual impairment and blindness in a population-based
study of Mashhad, Iran. Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 30(2),
161�168.
Heijthuijsen,
Astrid Anna Maria, Beunders, Victoria Apollonia Annemarie, Jiawan, Dinesh, de
Mesquita-Voigt, Anne Marie Bueno, Pawiroredjo, Jerrel, Mourits, Maarten, Tanck,
Michael, Verhoeff, Joost, & Saeed, Peerooz. (2013). Causes of severe visual
impairment and blindness in children in the Republic of Suriname. British
Journal of Ophthalmology, 97(7), 812�815.
Markos,
Merkineh, Kefyalew, Biruktayit, & Tesfaye, Hana Belay. (2022). Pooled
prevalence of blindness in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ
Open Ophthalmology, 7(1), e000949.
Pawar,
Neelam, Ravindran, Meenakshi, Fathima, Allapitchai, Ramakrishnan, K.,
Chakrabarthy, Sabyasachi, Aparna, K., & Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq. (2023).
Assessment of parental awareness about pediatric visual problems by
Knowledge-Attitude-Practice survey in South India. Indian Journal of
Ophthalmology, 71(5), 2175�2180.
Philip,
Krupa, Paudel, Prakash, Vincent, Jerry, Marmamula, Srinivas, Fricke, Timothy,
& Sankaridurg, Padmaja. (2021). Refractive Error and School Eye Health. In South-East
Asia Eye Health: Systems, Practices, and Challenges (pp. 145�168).
Springer.
Ramai,
D., & Pulisetty, T. (2013). Maternal and caregiver perceptions to childhood
eye care in Ghana. Internet Journal of Epidemiology, 11(1), 2�8.
Saxena,
Rohit, Vashist, Praveen, Singh, Digvijay, & Tandon, Radhika. (2015).
Preventing childhood blindness: Synergy between ophthalmology and community
medicine. Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Official Publication of
Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 40(3), 149.
Wadhwani,
Meenakshi, Vashist, Praveen, Senjam, Suraj Singh, Gupta, Vivek, Saxena, Rohit,
& Tandon, Radhika. (2021). A population-based study on the prevalence and
causes of childhood blindness and visual impairment in North India. Indian
Journal of Ophthalmology, 69(6), 1381.
Yahalom,
Claudia, Braun, Ron, Patal, Rani, Saadeh, Ibrahim, Blumenfeld, Anat, Macarov,
Michal, & Hendler, Karen. (2022). Childhood visual impairment and
blindness: 5-year data from a tertiary low vision center in Israel. Eye,
36(10), 2052�2056.
Copyright holder: Akbal Nur Karim, Agung Santosa (2023) |
First publication right: Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia |
This article is licensed under: |