Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia p–ISSN: 2541-0849 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol. 8, No. 12, Desember
2023
SUSTAINABLE TOURISM FROM ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVE: A LITERATURE
REVIEW
Saufa Yardha
Moerni
Program Studi Arsitektur,
Universitas Medan Area, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
This article discusses the main concept of
sustainable tourism to comprehend the terminology on definition, aspects, and
main concept. Furthermore, the discussion continues on how architecture plays
an important part in achieving the sustainability of tourist attraction areas,
and the practical ways that have been done from an architectural perspective.
The discussion in the architecture subject is divided into 2 parts: the
heritage building and new building, and how the architectural decision in those
areas plays part in supporting sustainable tourism. In heritage building
tourism, it is important to maintain the building is in good condition
physically and also functional. Adaptive re-use is mainly being used to
revitalize heritage buildings. In new buildings, there are several ways that
can be done to support sustainability in tourism and its usually by designing
an environmentally low negative impact building’s design. If these strategies
applied in buildings design, it is possible to develop a tourism area that
emphasizes the concept of sustainability.
Keyword: Sustainable Tourism, Sustainable Architecture, Energy-Efficient Building
Introduction
The idea of sustainability started in 1972 at
the UN’s Stockholm Conference, where the desire to make modern cities
“sustainable” emerged. Basiago (1995) stated that
‘sustainability’ links to the condition in the future and to achieve the
sustainability level, it is necessary to plan a preventative foundation to
avoid possible ecological damage. Sustainable development was named the most
significant 21st-century policy during The Earth Summit in 1992. Sustainable
development is intended to achieve sustainability in development(Redclift, 2005).
In 2015, the United Nations launched Sustainable
Development Goals consisting of 17 points to achieve whereas three (3) of the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) specifically reference tourism, including SDG
8 on growth and decent work, SDG 12 on sustainable consumption and production,
and SDG 14 on sustainable oceans. Before the United Nations publicize the
concept of sustainable tourism, this term has been commonly used in academic
circles since the 90s and comes with debates from those who agree or oppose the
concept.
As the word was being discussed in conferences
and international meetings alongside sustainable development, it drew the
world’s attention. Although it started with a debate about the importance of
sustainable tourism, recently the tourism sector started to pay more and more
attention to the ideas of sustainable tourism (Bâc, 2014).This article discusses the main concept of
sustainable tourism to comprehend the terminology on definition, aspects, and
main concept. Furthermore, the discussion continues on how architecture plays
an important part in achieving the sustainability of tourist attraction areas, and
the practical ways that have been done from an architectural perspective.
Sustainable Tourism Concept
(Muhanna, 2006) defines sustainable tourism as tourism that is
managed and developed in a sustainable manner and ensures that natural and cultural
resources are maintained while also preserving their economic, social, and
environmental integrity. As part of
sustainable development, the concept of sustainable tourism involves almost the
same aspect as sustainable development, which are social, cultural, and
economic aspects, and at the same time pays attention to its impact on the
environment .(Budeanu, 2005)
However, in recent years, these aspects are mainly
broken into 3 parts: sociocultural, economic, and environmental (Mensah, 2019;
Musayeva & Usmanov, 2022). All these aspects must be performed collectively
and integrated at different levels of action because if performed separately
will be an obstacle to achieving sustainability(Mensah, 2019). In order to achieve this sustainable concept where
the 3 aspects - sociocultural, economic, and environmental- are integrated
perfectly into a built environment, a city planner should make comprehensive
planning. This plan is basically made to preserve the built environment and
maintain its sustainability (Langston, 2008)
When applied thoroughly, sustainable tourism gives
positive impacts on tourist attraction areas. Economically, tourism can provide
new job opportunities, generating income and reducing poverty(Ennew, 2003). In many cases, when an area is visited by
tourists, there are some improvements in the environmental aspect especially in
landscape and infrastructure provided by the authorities to give a good
impression and facilities for the tourists(Fatimah, 2015). In the socio-cultural aspects, it is challenging
to quantify the effects of tourism because they are sometimes indirect(Zhong et al., 2011). However, Ramkisson
(2020) found the involvement of residents around tourist attraction areas can
contribute to the local’s happiness and well-being.
Although tourism has many good impacts on a country, it also has negative
consequences on the nearby towns, affecting inhabitants’ quality of life(Kim et al., 2013)(Bâc, 2014; Mensah, 2019; Zhuang et al.,
2019). Many studies have been conducted to see the negative impact of tourism
on the surrounding environment. Socially, there was racial discrimination (Tucker & Deale, 2018; Zhuang et al.,
2019), changes in local’s lifestyles , and also traditional beliefs (Zhuang et al., 2019). (Djebbour & Biara, 2020)claimed that the aspect most adversely impacted by tourism was the
ecology in the tourism region. Generally, the main object of tourism is the
natural environment, and the high number of tourists and visits can lead to the
over-exploitation of existing resources, which will ultimately have a negative
impact on the environment. In developing countries, a large number of tourists
can cause damage to infrastructure because the original design maybe did not
consider the additional people that using it.
One of the man-made aspects of the built environment is architecture.
Architecture has always been part of tourism. Objects that attract tourists to
visit are natural scenery such as lakes, mountains, beaches, and waterfalls;
man-made buildings such as religious and heritage sites, and also intangible
aspects such as local culture ,
When architecture is linked to the term sustainable, it could mean the
sustainability of the heritage buildings acted as the tourist attraction in the
area, or it also could mean the sustainability of a building in terms of environmental friendly and safety of a building in terms of
energy saving (Bouhdanowicz). As part of the built
environment, architecture plays an important role in succeeding the sustainable
tourism agenda. Appropriate land use and physical design support the
sustainability of the environment; therefore, it is important to establish
proper physical planning (including architecture) in a tourism area to preserve
ecology and biodiversity.
Sustainable Tourism in heritage buildings
Heritage buildings as part of cultural heritage considered to be one of
the most significant attractions for tourists. Heritage sites are popular
tourist destinations because of the scenery, architecture, and diversity of
cultures. However, overuse or bad management of tourism may harm cultural
sites' significance, inherent value, and integrity. But if it was done
properly, the preservation can be a cultural mediator and gives an impact for
the community’s well-being.(Djebbour & Biara, 2020)
Planning a sustainable tourism concept in an area required prior analysis
and research to determine the direction of the development. In areas that use
heritage buildings as tourist attractions, historical analysis is also
important. In making functional changes to heritage buildings, it is important
to make changes as minimal as possible, to maintain the safety of the building,
and also to preserve the memories of the old buildings’ function.(Ragheb, 2021)
Therefore, an adaptive reuse concept is mainly being used to revitalize
heritage buildings. In heritage buildings, to achieve successful preservation,
it is important to plan a new function for old buildings to last for years(Ragheb, 2021). This new function of the heritage buildings that are different from its
old function, to aim for the buildings’ sustainability is known for the
terminology adaptive reuse. To find a suitable new function, there are several
methodologies that have been done by researchers.
Ragheb’s (2021) research in Cordahi
Complex in Alexandria, Egypt, used the multi-criteria process called A’WOT to
get a multi-criteria decision about the best adaptive reuse that can be applied
to the object. In Tlemcen City, Algeria, Dejbbour & Biara (2020) are
using The Evaluation Grid method to identify the project's advantages and
disadvantages with regard to sustainable development standards.
Several additional methods are also being used to do an analytical
approach for heritage building such as the use of integrated hierarchical
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Analytic Hierarchy Concepts (AHP) as a
tool to do a prior evaluation of some parameters being used in the process of
adaptive reuse in heritage buildings. These methods are varied but the main
goal is to find the most suitable and sustainable adaptive reuse for the
heritage building.
The A’WOT method used in Cordahi Complex,
Alexandria, Egypt, shows that the most suitable new function is Cultural Art
Center, followed by a mixed-use, office building, and hotel as the last option.
The result shows that Cultural Art Center is the best option because it doesn't
need much intervention or changes in the old building, so the safety and
stability of the building are well maintained. The second and third method is
used to analyze several indicators related to sustainable development aspects.
Analysis in determining the new function in heritage building is a critical
phase prior to determining the new function to guarantee the sustainability of
the building both physically and the activities.
Heritage buildings have immense potential to be the main tourism object
in an area but come supported facilities need to be available. These facilities
are hotels, restaurants, public toilets, and rest areas as well as good
infrastructure as stated in the study. These facilities act as support for
heritage tourism activities, but their existence also influences the
sustainability aspects of an area. Therefore the
sustainability concept should also be applied to these facilities.
Sustainable tourism in new buildings
The approach to sustainable tourism is different in every built
environment. Najdeska & Rakicevik
(2012) stated that a soft sustainable tourism approach could be implemented for
functions such as hotels and theme parks. There are some considerations to note
that these buildings are under governmental authority in the tourism sector. In
a built environment that is still intact and natural both physically and
culturally, the application of sustainable tourism will be different and
probably take the opposite approach, where an increase in tourism activities
and tourist visits can cause social and cultural damage to the environment.
In this case, the concept of sustainable tourism that is implemented must
be based on the principles of caution and prevention, which in extreme cases
can lead to a solution to banning tourism activities in that place. One aspect
of quality tourism is how the place benefits the local community and the
environment. Therefore, in the planning and development of tourism objects, the
local community should be involved considering that the community is the person
who will be directly involved in the tourism activity.
Therefore, the design of tourism support facilities, if carried out
following the principles of sustainable architecture, will support the tourism
area in terms of function, but will also be 'friendly' to the environment, and
as a result, the tourist area will be categorized as 'sustainable'. tourism'.
To aim for sustainable architecture, designers have quite many options from
different points of view. Using sustainable materials in the new building is
one of the options.
It is known that when material whose shape is closer to its original
shape, has the least negative impact on the environment and also has minimum
disposal on its production. Architects and designers usually interpret this by
using the most natural materials such as wood or bamboo. However, Shoubi, et, al (2013) studied whether the use of plastic
bottle materials can be considered sustainable. The result shows that
architects and designers can reuse plastic bottles for certain parts of the
building (walls, roof, etc) and although it is
applied in only some parts of the building, it is quite influential in reducing
CO2 emissions.
To determine the most suitable material to enhance the sustainability of
the building, architects usually use the analytical hierarchy process (AHP),
however fuzzy extended analytical hierarchy process (FEAHP) can be an
alternative tool to be used because the latter offer benefits from being able
to quantitatively represent uncertainty and ambiguity and offers defined
techniques for addressing the imprecision inherent in many problems.
Hotels and accommodations as supporting facilities are one of the highest
energy users in the tourism industry. The use of electricity in the
accommodation and restaurant industries in Australia covered as much as 53%
(UNWTO). Furthermore, hotels and accommodations also produce significant waste
products in their environment. In order to aim for sustainability in buildings,
most of the research that has been published focuses on ways to save energy,
and water, and make buildings more ecologically friendly by, for example,
lowering carbon emissions.
These goals can be reached by practicing energy-efficient building
design. Some studies show passive design in buildings, such as creating a
proper building envelope, double façade buildings, or adding sun shading,
affects the amount of solar radiation through buildings and therefore
influences energy usage in heating and cooling systems in the building.
Energy efficiency in buildings can also be achieved through the use of
energy-efficient mechanical and electrical systems in the building. For
example, using a heat pump with an average CPO of 2.0 for a hotel’s pool is
saving more energy, and also produces lower greenhouse and noxious emissions
than using a conventional electric boiler. In reducing water usage, water
aerators or 'economy' water flush systems can be installed in toilets’ faucets.
Installation of solar panels for producing energy for lighting in hotels is
also possible, whereas some hotels using this system have proven to be very
cost-effective and also environmentally friendly.
Conclusion
Sustainability
tourism related to architecture can be implemented in several approaches. In
heritage building tourism, determining the most suitable new function for an
old building is the most crucial decision. Choosing the new function can be
done in several analysis techniques such as A’WOT, SEM, or AHP.
In the
new building, the concept of sustainability can be achieved from different
points of view which are: 1) choosing the least negative impact materials to
the environment, 2) designing buildings that support the principles of energy
saving and minimal negative impact on the environment, and 3) choosing the most
energy-efficient mechanical, electrical and utility systems in the building.
All of the strategies mentioned previously can be used simultaneously.
Practicing
all strategies will guarantee the success of implementing the concept of
sustainable tourism. However, in some conditions, when designers, planners, and
architects have limited resources to apply many strategies, it is possible to
choose several techniques which is the most suitable or possible approach to be
done.
BIBLIOGRAFI
Bâc, D. P. (2014). The emergence of
sustainable tourism-A literature review. QUAESTUS Multidisciplinary Research
Journal, 4, 131–140.
Budeanu, A. (2005). Impacts and
responsibilities for sustainable tourism: a tour operator’s perspective. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 13(2), 89–97.
Djebbour, I., & Biara, R. W. (2020).
The challenge of adaptive reuse towards the sustainability of heritage
buildings. International Journal of Conservation Science, 11(2),
519–530.
Ennew, C. (2003). Understanding the economic
impact of tourism. World, 477, 463–466.
Fatimah, T. (2015). The impacts of rural
tourism initiatives on cultural landscape sustainability in Borobudur area. Procedia
Environmental Sciences, 28, 567–577.
Kim, K., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M. J.
(2013). How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community
residents? Tourism Management, 36, 527–540.
Langston, C. (2008). Sustainable
practices in the built environment. Routledge.
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development:
Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action:
Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653531.
Muhanna, E. (2006). Sustainable tourism
development and environmental management for developing countries. Problems
and Perspectives in Management, 4(2), 14–30.
Musayeva, S., & Usmanov, F. (2022).
Ways To Develop Marketing Activities In Tourist Organizations. Science and
Innovation, 1(A5), 84–88.
Ragheb, G. A. (2021). Multi-Criteria
Decision Making of Sustainable Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings Based on
the A’WOT Analysis: A Case Study of Cordahi Complex, Alexandria, Egypt. International
Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning.
Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable
development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development,
13(4), 212–227.
Tucker, C. N., & Deale, C. S. (2018).
Embedded and exposed: Exploring the lived experiences of African American
tourists. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 16(5), 482–500.
Zhong, L., Deng, J., Song, Z., & Ding,
P. (2011). Research on environmental impacts of tourism in China: Progress and
prospect. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(11), 2972–2983.
Zhuang, X., Yao, Y., & Li, J. (2019).
Sociocultural impacts of tourism on residents of world cultural heritage sites
in China. Sustainability, 11(3), 840.
Copyright holder: Saufa Yardha Moerni (2023) |
First publication right: Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah
Indonesia |
This article is licensed under: |