Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia p–ISSN: 2541-0849 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol.
9, No. 7, Juli 2024
IMPLEMENTATION
OF ANTI-ABRASION GRID IN SUMSEL-5 580 t/h CFB BOILER (RELIABILITY AND
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION)
Ridho Qodri1, Shafly
Fuadi2, Dwi Luthfi
Ainun Ilmi3
Operation
Department PT DSSP Power Sumsel, South
Sumatera, Indonesia1,3
Mechanical
Department PT DSSP Power Sumsel, South
Sumatera, Indonesia2
Email:
[email protected]1, [email protected]2,
Abstract
CFB Boiler
operated with turbulence model and fast fluidization. This model regime gives
CFB boiler great heat distribution and increase boiler efficiency. Disadvantage
of regime is due boiler furnace feed with coal, sand and limestone as bed
material. Bed material with the high velocity and turbulence regime can be harmful
for water and steam tube inside of furnace. Operational challenges such as abrasion
and abrasion of boiler components will significantly affect their efficiency
and increase possible force shutdown because of boiler tube leakage. This
research investigated the implementation of anti-abrasion grids perpendicular
to water wall tubes of Sumsel-5 CFB Boiler, installed horizontally and
vertically to mitigate abrasion and enhance overall performance. The tube
thickness comparison method, which was measured every outage, was used to
investigate the effectiveness of the anti-abrasion grid. Since the installation
of the anti-abrasion grid, the frequency of forced outages at the Sumsel-5
power plant has decreased significantly. The result showed that anti-abrasion
grid installation could increase the lifespan of the CFB boiler, reduce the
abrasion rate by more than 50%, and lead to enhanced boiler performance by 0,4%.
Anti-abrasion grid installation could also reduce the maintenance cost due to
water wall tube repair.
Keywords: circulating fluidized boiler, anti-abrasion grid,
abrasion, performance enhancement
Introduction
CFB
Boilers have the advantage of a highly varied use of coal, in addition to the
use of other replacement fuels (Lockwood, 2013; Yue et al., 2017). Boilers with CFB
type have the advantage of being efficient combustion with more clean exhaust
gas emission characteristics of SOx and NOx
content compared to other types of boilers. Besides these advantages, several drawbacks
are constantly faced.
Abrasion
is one of the major problems and become main failure during operation of CFB (Arjunwadkar et al., 2016). Abrasion also
become reason longer outage. Abrasion is the process when material is scratched
on the surface because of impacting particle (Grochowalski et al., 2023). Sumsel-5 has faced
a lot of downtime because of the abrasion tube wall furnace. Total downtime
from 2020-2021 is 2.374 hours and 51,30% of downtime happened because of tube
leak inside of furnace.
The
circulation of solid particles in furnaces involves various fluidization
phenomena, including bed movement, bubbling process, fast fluidized beds, and
pneumatic transport that occurs between solid-gas phases within the furnace.
One
common problem in CFB-type boilers is continuous abrasion due to direct contact
between the solid particles and the tube in the boiler at high speeds. Several
studies have been carried out including the installation of multi-stage
anti-wear beams that are used as a coating for the impact of solid particles
against the tube, or to reduce the speed of impact against tube surface (Xu et al., 2017).
Anti-abrasion
coatings are used to change the regime of gas-solid flow in furnaces, some
studies conducted including (Li et al., 2023), using castable
anti-wear beams have been shown to stop the impact of a solid material against
the walls of the water wall.
Xin Li researched
the effects of metal anti-wear on water wall abrasion by using 7 anti-abrasion
metal variables with type A-G (Fig 1) measured and evaluated based on the abrasion
rate index, taking into account the operating effects of parameters and ash
deposit altitude zones (Y.-F. Xia et al., 2013).
Figure 1.
Different anti-abrasion metal design
One
efficient way to protect against water-wall abrasion is to install multi-stage
anti-wear beams on the water wall. Such beams can effectively disrupt the gas–solid
downward flow of the wall layer in the near-wall region, reducing the downflow
speed and inhibiting water-wall wear. This technology has been applied in 300 MWe
CFB boilers, and good results have been shown. Several different anti-wear beam
designs (Fig. 2) have been proposed (Y.-F. Xia et al., 2013; Y. Xia et al., 2015)
Figure
2. Different anti-abrasion beam design
Dwiputra et al
implemented multiple layers of anti-abrasion beam in 100 MW Tarahan
CFB Boiler. Anti-abrasion beam was proved to prevent the boiler trips caused by
tube leaks, by continuously running the boiler for 6 months without tripping.
Installation of anti-abrasion beam had a slight drawback on reduction of total
heat rate absorbed by steam generator by around 1% (Dwiputra et al., 2012).
The
efficient method to reduce the abrasion in water wall tube is pivotal to
promote boiler reliability. Therefore, selection of anti-abrasion grid material
and correct grid installation needs to be considered. This research discussed
the implementation of anti-abrasion grid in Sumsel-5 CFB Boiler, composed of
metal material and added one more type of grid installation, regarded as
horizontal grid installation to improve the water wall reliability. Water wall
tube thickness and boiler performance were also observed as critical
indications to examine the effectiveness of the anti-abrasion grid
installation.
Water
Wall Tube Abrasion
Failure
of waterwall tube investigated and continue analysis by center for materials
processing and failure analysis faculty of engineering, Universitas Indonesia.
Figure
3. Abrasion mechanism and defected tube sample
The
failed water wall tube was investigated and examined to observe some findings
related to the failure. During examination, it was found that the outer surface
of waterwall tube severely damaged with leakages observed in outer diameter
surface. The damaged has been reported by abrasion that causes thinning from
the outside diameter of the tube. Wall thickness reduction in some areas of the
failed tubes have taken place from external surface, so this side of tube is
flattened. Corrosion and damaged from internal surface diameter of tube, the
damage mechanism is caused from the outer diameter of the tube. Flattening must
have been caused by abrasion action.
EDS
Test result on fracture surface of the sample revealed the high content of
silicon (Si), indicate the presence of abrasion mechanism of waterwall tube due
the solid particle. The silicon element detected in this particle was not from
the tube material because it exceeded the specification of tube material. The
high silicon concentration comes from the silica sand. Damage to the waterwall
accelerated by fly ash entrained in the high-velocity fluidization directed
against the tube surface (Y. Xia et al., 2015).
(1)
Notation
T is for abrasion, c is for material abrasion coefficient, n is for material
impact rate, µ is for material concentration, w is for material flow rate, and t is for time.
Heat Transfer
(2)
Notation
q is for heat transfer rate, U is for overall heat transfer coefficient, A is
for effective heat transfer area, and ∆T is for temperature difference. Heat transfer characteristic become key issue during this design process
of anti-abrasion grid, not only to maintain efficiency of boiler, but also to
maintain uniformity on boiler tubes temperature and to avoid the tubes to have
overheating issue.
Heat transfer coefficient increase linier with the superficial gas
velocity. The higher fluidized air flow rate will increase larger solid
carrying capacity, this phenomenon contribute to increasing suspended density
above the dense zone. Thus the
heat transfer coefficient on the upper furnace will increases significant (Cheng et al., 2020). In other hand, considering the velocity and
concentration are the most factor effecting on erosion
(Song et al., 2012). The upper zone of refractory is susceptible to larger
solid abrasion.
The heat transfer profile will decrease with the height of
the furnace (Basu & Fraser, 2015). The additional anti-abrasion plate will change the flow
of the bed material and reduce heat transfer from conduction due to the changed
tube dimensions in addition of the abrasion plate. The angle of incidence of
hot air from the boiler will also change slightly so the heat transfer rate calculation
must be carried out to keep
up boiler overall efficiency (Yang et al., 2020).
Research Method
Design Model
The
design model of anti-abrasion grid consists of 3 types, comprising of vertical
water wall, horizontal water wall, and horizontal split water wall.
Anti-abrasion grid used for the installation composed of YP22Gr8NiRe material
type.
Figure
4. Design model of horizontal water wall anti-abrasion grid
Figure
5. Design model of vertical water wall anti-abrasion grid
Figure
6. Horizontal and vertical anti-abrasion grid sample
Installation
Anti-abrasion
grid was installed at elevation of 14 m until 41 m, with the distance between horizontal
grid of 0,2 m; 0,6 m; 0,8 m; and 1 m. The distance between vertical grid was
set to 1,2 m. Anti-abrasion grid installation was perpendicular to water wall
tubes. Anti-abrasion grid installation was done on 4 sides of water wall,
including on front water wall, south side water wall, north side water wall,
and rear water wall.
Figure
7. Schematic installation of anti-abrasion grid on front water wall
Figure
8. Schematic installation of anti-abrasion grid on north and south side of
water wall
Figure
9. Schematic installation of anti-abrasion grid on rear water wall
Analysis
Tube
thickness data will be taken from 2021 to 2023 to compare the abrasion rate
before and after installation to see the effectiveness of the grid installation
in reducing the abrasion rate in boiler water wall tube. Indirect method of boiler
efficiency calculation was used as the indicator for the performance evaluation
analysis, referring to the method from ASME PTC-4 [1]. Corresponding parameters
will be taken right before installation in February 2022 and after installation
in March 2022 to see whether any performance decrement occurs or not. The
critical parameters for boiler efficiency calculation can be seen as follows:
Table I.
Critical Parameters for Boiler Efficiency Calculation
Description |
Unit |
High Heating Value (HHV) as fired basis |
kcal/kg |
Low Heating Value (LHV) as fired
basis |
kcal/kg |
Primary air rate |
% |
Secondary air rate |
% |
Fluidizing air rate |
% |
Air temperature entering the boiler |
℃ |
Flue gas temperature at APH outlet |
℃ |
Results and
Discussion
Installation and
Abrasion Rate Analysis
Figure
10. Installed grid in Sumsel-5
Anti-abrasion
grid was installed during maintenance outage in 2022 and would be observed back
in 2023 to see the effectiveness of the installation. During one year of full
operation, no trip was occurred due to water wall tube leak. Visual check
result also showed that no sign of significant abrasion was impacted on water
wall tubes.
Table
2. Front Water Wall Tube Thickness
Tube
Number |
Area |
Nominal
Thickness 2021 (mm) |
Nominal
Thickness 2022 (mm) |
Nominal
Thickness 2023 (mm) |
|
21 |
Front
Water Wall (EL 21
m) |
6,2 |
6 |
5,8 |
|
22 |
5,9 |
5,7 |
5,6 |
||
23 |
6,2 |
5,7 |
5,6 |
||
24 |
6 |
5,8 |
5,7 |
||
25 |
6,2 |
5,6 |
5,5 |
||
26 |
6 |
5,9 |
5,9 |
||
27 |
6,3 |
5,7 |
5,6 |
||
28 |
6,1 |
6 |
5,8 |
||
29 |
6,1 |
6 |
5,9 |
||
30 |
6,4 |
6,1 |
5,9 |
||
171 |
Front
Water Wall (EL 30
m) |
6,5 |
5,7 |
5,5 |
|
172 |
6,5 |
5,5 |
4,8 |
||
173 |
6,5 |
5,7 |
5,6 |
||
174 |
6,1 |
5,6 |
5,3 |
||
175 |
5,9 |
5,6 |
5,1 |
||
176 |
6,1 |
5,5 |
5 |
||
177 |
6,1 |
5,3 |
5 |
||
178 |
6,1 |
5,2 |
4,8 |
||
179 |
6,1 |
5,4 |
4,9 |
||
180 |
6,2 |
5,5 |
5,2 |
Table
3. South Side Water Wall Tube Thickness
Tube
Number |
Area |
Nominal
Thickness 2021 (mm) |
Nominal
Thickness 2022 (mm) |
Nominal
Thickness 2023 (mm) |
|
21 |
South
Side Water Wall (EL 21 m) |
6,1 |
6 |
5,8 |
|
22 |
6,1 |
5,9 |
5,8 |
||
23 |
6,4 |
6,1 |
5,9 |
||
24 |
6,2 |
6,1 |
5,7 |
||
25 |
6,4 |
6,1 |
5,8 |
||
26 |
6,3 |
6 |
5,9 |
||
27 |
6,3 |
6 |
5,8 |
||
28 |
6,2 |
5,8 |
5,8 |
||
29 |
6,2 |
5,7 |
5,7 |
||
30 |
6,4 |
5,9 |
5,6 |
||
81 |
South
Side Water Wall (EL 30 m) |
6,1 |
5,8 |
5,6 |
|
82 |
6,1 |
5,6 |
5,5 |
||
83 |
6,1 |
5,8 |
5,8 |
||
84 |
6,1 |
5,7 |
5,6 |
||
85 |
6,1 |
5,6 |
5,5 |
||
86 |
6,3 |
6 |
5,8 |
||
87 |
6,2 |
5,8 |
5,4 |
||
88 |
5,9 |
5,8 |
5,8 |
||
89 |
6,1 |
6 |
6 |
||
90 |
6,3 |
5,9 |
5,9 |
Figure
11. Average abrasion rate of water wall tubes
Table 2
and Table 3 represent tube thickness samples in front and south side of water
wall tubes from 2021 to 2023. Most of the samples showed that anti-abrasion
installation changed the tube thickness decrease rate significantly. Anti-abrasion
grid installation is proven to cause velocity reduction of particles and
simultaneously reduce contact frequency of the particles; thus, the abrasion
rate can be reduced. It was also observed that all samples of tube thickness
were above the thickness standard, which is 4,5 mm.
Based
on Figure 11, the reduction
of abrasion rate of front water wall (EL 21 m), front water wall (EL 30 m),
south side water wall (EL 21 m), and south side water wall (EL 30 m) is 58,6%;
46,5%; 40,0%; and 60,6% respectively. Reduction of the abrasion rate by more
than 50% had significant impact on tubes reliability, reducing maintenance cost,
and increasing operation time of the CFB boiler.
Performance
Analysis
Table 4.
Critical Parameters for Boiler Efficiency Data
Description |
Unit |
Before Installation |
After Installation |
High Heating Value (HHV) as fired
basis |
kcal/kg |
3.371 |
3.359 |
Low Heating Value (LHV) as fired
basis |
kcal/kg |
2.963 |
2.914 |
Primary air rate |
% |
0,40 |
0,39 |
Secondary air rate |
% |
0,57 |
0,60 |
Fluidizing air rate |
% |
0,02 |
0,02 |
Air temperature entering the boiler |
℃ |
52,71 |
48,35 |
Flue gas temperature at APH outlet |
℃ |
131,74 |
133,79 |
Figure 12.
Boiler efficiency calculation result graph
Figure 12 presents boiler
efficiency calculation results using indirect method, comparing before outage
and after outage. Based on calculation result, it was observed that measured
boiler thermal efficiency (HHV), corrected boiler thermal efficiency (HHV),
measured boiler thermal efficiency (LHV), and corrected boiler thermal
efficiency (LHV) were slightly increased by 0,18%; 0,43%; 0,43%; and 0,47%
respectively. Although anti-abrasion grid installation gave a slight decrement in
overall heat transfer coefficient due to less solid particle contacting on
water wall tubes, along with less coal calorific value and primary air rate, it
was seen that anti-abrasion grid installation helped in the increase of heat
transfer area, following the heat transfer on water wall tube principal [10], so
heat transfer between combustion area to water wall boiler efficiency could
still be maintained at a constant magnitude.
Compared
to anti-abrasion beam installation as investigated by Dwiputra
et al [11], anti-abrasion grid installation gave the advantage in maintaining
boiler performance of particular unit, relative to material composition and
heat transfer area. The use of anti-abrasion beam could affect heat transfer
area decrement due to water wall tube coverage and overall heat transfer
coefficient decrement due to material composition, which is made from castable
refractory. Anti-abrasion grid installation kept boiler performance since grid
installed did not cover water wall tube surface area due to thin configuration.
Moreover, grid installation also helped to promote heat transfer increment due
to material used to make the grid, which is stainless steel-like material.
Conclusion
Anti-abrasion grid
was proven to increase the unit reliability since no trips occurred due to
water wall tube leak. Anti-abrasion grid installation was proven to reduce
overall abrasion rate in water wall tubes by more than 50%. Moreover, anti-abrasion
grid installation did not reduce overall boiler performance by slightly increasing
boiler efficiency by around 0,4%.
Acknowledgement
The
authors gratefully acknowledge Mr. Lyu Yong Jun (CTO) and Mr. Chong Chee Shang
(IPP Plant Head) for their continuous effort in the characterization part of
the paper and their constant source of inspiration in writing it. The authors
are also grateful to all personnel at PT DSSP Power Sumsel
for providing the information necessary for the completion of this work.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arjunwadkar, A., Basu, P., & Acharya, B. (2016). A review
of some operation and maintenance issues of CFBC boilers. Applied Thermal
Engineering, 102, 672–694.
Basu, P., & Fraser,
S. A. (2015). Circulating fluidized bed boilers. Springer.
Cheng, L., Ji, J., Wei,
Y., Wang, Q., Fang, M., Luo, Z., Ni, M., & Cen, K. (2020). A note on
large-size supercritical CFB technology development. Powder Technology, 363,
398–407.
Dwiputra, A., Felani, I.,
& Darmanto, A. S. P. S. (2012). CFD Modelling of Multiple Layer Anti
Abrasion Beam Implementation at 100 MW Tarahan CFB Boiler. Proceedings of
the World Congress on Engineering, 3.
Grochowalski, J., Widuch,
A., Sładek, S., Melka, B., Nowak, M., Klimanek, A., Andrzejczyk, M., Klajny,
M., Czarnowska, L., & Hernik, B. (2023). Technique for reducing erosion in
large-scale circulating fluidized bed units. Powder Technology, 426,
118651.
Li, X., Zhang, M., Wei,
L., Wu, F., & Luo, K. (2023). Effect of metal anti-wear device on the water
wall erosion in CFB boiler. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 189,
126–137.
Lockwood, T. (2013).
Techno-economic analysis of PC versus CFB combustion technology. IEA Clean
Coal Centre.
Song, J. H., Wang, T.,
Hu, X. Y., & Dong, C. Q. (2012). Erosion mechanism of platen heating
surfaces in CFB. Advanced Materials Research, 472, 2287–2291.
Wuhan Yongping Technology
Co., L. (2018). https://www.zgypkj.com/en/solution/grille/90.html.
Xia, Y.-F., Cheng, L.-M.,
Zhang, J.-C., Wang, Q.-H., & Fang, M.-X. (2013). Numerical study of
gas-solid flow field in a 600 MW CFB boiler with anti-wear beams. Dongli
Gongcheng Xuebao(Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering), 33(2),
81–87.
Xia, Y., Cheng, L., Yu,
C., Xu, L., Wang, Q., & Fang, M. (2015). Anti-wear beam effects on
gas–solid hydrodynamics in a circulating fluidized bed. Particuology, 19,
173–184.
Xu, L., Cheng, L., Ji,
J., & Wang, Q. (2017). Effect of anti-wear beams on waterwall heat transfer
in a CFB boiler. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 115,
1092–1098.
Yang, Z., Song, G., Na,
Y., Lyu, Q., Su, H., Yao, J., Chen, Y., & Guo, Q. (2020). Investigation on
the heat transfer coefficient and uniformity in a polygonal furnace of a 350 MW
supercritical CFB boiler. Applied Thermal Engineering, 175,
115279.
Yue, G., Cai, R., Lu, J.,
& Zhang, H. (2017). From a CFB reactor to a CFB boiler–The review of
R&D progress of CFB coal combustion technology in China. Powder
Technology, 316, 18–28.
Yunus, A. C., &
Afshin, J. G. (2015). Heat and Mass Transfer: Fundamentals & Applications,
5th edition. McGraw-Hill Education.
Copyright
holder: Ridho Qodri, Shafly
Fuadi, Dwi Luthfi Ainun Ilmi (2024) |
First
publication right: Syntax Literate:
Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia |
This
article is licensed under: |