Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia p�ISSN:
2541-0849 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol. 7, No. 6, Juni 2022
FINANCIAL DISTRESS ANALYSIS OF
MANUFACTURING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE IDX FOR THE 2016-2020 PERIOD WITH
SPRINGATE AND ALTMAN METHODS
Felicia,
Maria Ulpah
Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic period is a difficult time for many business actors
where this pandemic has a negative impact that causes entrepreneurs to have to
adapt to new situations. In running its business, it is not uncommon for
companies to fail to achieve their short-term and long-term goals, causing
operational losses in the current year. If the loss is experienced continuously
by the company, then the event can bring the company to bankruptcy until
bankruptcy. In the third quarter of 2021, BPS recorded a manufacturing industry
growth of 3.68 percent, a fairly good increase in the midst of the large number
of COVID-19 cases in Indonesia. According to the Central Statistics Agency
(BPS), 5 business sectors contributed 63.8 percent to Indonesia's Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) in the fourth quarter of 2021, with the manufacturing sector
taking first place with a contribution of 18.3 percent to GDP. Therefore, there
are various reasons why this research is important, including the fact that the
manufacturing sector is very important in the production of primary and
secondary goods for public consumption and other enterprises. Manufacturing
companies are also still the leading sector or sectors that lead and contribute
to the country's economic growth and in the absorption of labor. In addition,
this study also wants to prove whether it is true that the manufacturing sector
shows a positive stretch during the pandemic, or only some industries in the
manufacturing sector by using the Springate S-Score
and Altman Z-Score methods. Calculations of financial condition carried out by
the Springate and Altman methods on manufacturing
companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2020 show that the Springate method groups 282 samples into the healthy
category and another 283 into the distress category. While the Altman method
groups 235 samples into the healthy category, 136 samples into the gray zone
category, and 194 others into the distress category. The results also show that
the Springate method has a higher level of
consistency than the Altman method in this study.
Keywords: �Financial Distress, Manufacturing, Springate, Altman, Financial Distress, Bankruptcy,
Pandemic, COVID-19.
Introduction
Companies with good financial conditions
will certainly try to carry out their activities effectively and efficiently,
for example by doing automation or by reducing work stages that do not have
added value so as to reduce costs and increase profits. In practice, companies
are faced with 2 main goals: long-term goals and short-term goals.
Every year, the company publishes
financial statements containing income and costs borne, cash flows received and
issued, asset and debt values, and others that aim to show the company's
financial position and are expected to be a tool for decision makers to
understand the company's financial situation. The financial statements are also
a means for shareholders to further examine how the company's performance has
been over the past year. Sometimes, published financial reports may contain
information that looks good, without realizing that the company is facing financial
problems that must be resolved immediately.
�In
running its business, it is not uncommon for companies to fail to achieve their
short-term and long-term goals, causing operational losses in the current year.
If the loss is experienced continuously by the company, then the event can
bring the company to bankruptcy until bankruptcy. If a company has been
declared bankrupt by the court, then the company must sell all of its assets
which will later be used to pay off the company's obligations. The company's
assets during the bankruptcy period will be managed and sold, which will be
managed by a curator who is directly appointed by the court.
The COVID-19 pandemic period is a
difficult time for many business actors where this pandemic has a negative
impact that causes entrepreneurs to have to adapt to new situations. The
unpleasant impact is not only felt by small business actors, but also by
large-scale companies. Large companies also receive a significant impact from
the regulation. According to Erwin Haryono (Head of
the BI Communications Department), the results of the Business Activity Survey
show that respondents estimate that business activity will slow down in the
third quarter of 2021 when compared to the achievement of business activities in
the previous quarter. In addition, Hariyadi Sukamdani said that if the Emergency PPKM was extended it
would worsen the world's economic and business situation, because the very
strict restrictions on activities caused the income of several companies to drop
drastically.
With the drastic decline in income, the
company must have tried various ways to save its operations, by cutting
salaries and incentives, or by reducing the number of workers and conducting
layoffs. The pandemic, which has lasted for approximately 2 years, has not only
caused significant losses to companies, but has also caused employees to lose
their jobs and increased unemployment in Indonesia. Jobstreet
Indonesia has distributed questionnaires to workers affected by the COVID-19
pandemic which was conducted in October 2020, where 35% of workers were laid
off and 19% of workers were temporarily laid off. However, after terminating
their employees, several companies are still unable to finance their
operational activities, resulting in financial distress which, if followed up
late, will lead the company to bankruptcy and bankruptcy.
This study pays attention to all
companies belonging to the manufacturing sector which are said to have grown
aggressively in the midst of the pandemic and do not appear to have received
too much negative impact due to the pandemic.
According to the Central Statistics
Agency, the manufacturing sector grew negatively by -2.93 percent during 2020.
However, in the first quarter of 2021, the manufacturing sector experienced growth,
although it still contracted by -0.71 percent. In the third quarter of 2021,
BPS recorded a manufacturing industry growth of 3.68 percent, a fairly good
increase in the midst of the large number of COVID-19 cases in Indonesia.
According to the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), 5 business sectors
contributed 63.8 percent to Indonesia's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the
fourth quarter of 2021, with the manufacturing sector ranking first with a
contribution of 18.3 percent to GDP. Therefore, there are various reasons why
this research is important, including the fact that the manufacturing sector is
very important in the production of primary and secondary goods for public
consumption and other enterprises.
Furthermore, despite the pandemic, the manufacturing
sector remains the leading sector in Indonesia, so the level of financial
health is very important to monitor. The manufacturing sector is an important
sector in Indonesia because it contributes significantly to economic growth and
employment in Indonesia. This sector also contributes to the expansion of
Indonesia's exports and investment. Manufacturing companies are also still the
leading sector or sectors that lead and contribute to the country's economic
growth and in the absorption of labor.
Previous research was conducted by Rahmat (2020) entitled "Analysis of Financial Distress
Using the Altman Z-Score Model, Springate Zmijewski, Grover and the Camel Method of Bank Health
Assessment" with research results showing that PT. BPR Intan
Jabar did not experience financial distress and was
categorized as a healthy BPR. In addition, another study was conducted by
Marisa Fitriani and Nurul Huda (2020) entitled
"Analysis of Financial Distress Prediction Using the Springate
Method (S-Score) at PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk with
research results showing that PT Garuda Indonesia is in the distress category
and has the potential to went bankrupt.
Therefore, there are various reasons why this research is
important, including the fact that the manufacturing sector is very important
in the production of primary and secondary goods for public consumption and
other enterprises. Manufacturing companies are also still the leading sector or
sectors that lead and contribute to the country's economic growth and in the absorption
of labor. In addition, this research also wants to prove whether the
manufacturing sector really shows a positive stretch during the pandemic, or
only a few companies in the manufacturing sector. Another reason is because it
is very important to detect distress conditions in the company first so that
the company's management can make the right and careful business strategy to
improve the company's performance before it leads to bankruptcy. This study
will examine the financial health of companies in the manufacturing sector on
the Indonesia Stock Exchange, in the last 5 years including conditions before
and during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Springate
Model and the Altman Model.
Distress conditions that occur can be calculated and
predicted using various available models. Previous research conducted by
Malaika (2019) entitled �Analysis of the Accuracy of Predicting Bankruptcy with
the Altman Z-Score, Springate, Ohlson Method in
Financial Distress Conditions� showed that the Springate
method produced the highest level of prediction accuracy, followed by Altman
and then Ohlson. Another study conducted by Bimo Aryo Seto and Sri Trisnaningsih (2021) with the title "Using the Altman
Z-Score, Springate, Zmijewski
and Grover Models in Predicting Financial Distress" shows that Altman has
the highest level of accuracy, followed by the Zmijewski
model and the Springate. In addition, according to
BAPEPAM (2005), the Springate and Altman models have
advantages in that there is a calculation of EBIT to total assets ratio which
is the best indicator to determine the occurrence of bankruptcy. Based on these
reasons, the researcher is interested in comparing the two models, namely the Springate model and the Altman model.
In contrast to previous research, this study is entitled
"Analysis of Financial Distress in Manufacturing Sector Companies Listed
on the Stock Exchange in 2016-2020 With the Springate
and Altman Models", and will examine whether financial difficulties and
bankruptcy predictions faced by companies in the manufacturing sector use the Springate model. and Altman for comparison. The population
in this study are all manufacturing companies in Indonesia listed on the
Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2016 and 2020.
Research Methodology
Research
design
This
study aims to test and predict the company's financial difficulties, especially
for manufacturing companies listed on the IDX in 2016 to 2020. This type of research
is to make predictions made with secondary data and quantitative methods with
the object of research in the form of annual financial report data. published
by manufacturing sector companies listed on the Stock Exchange in 2016 and
2020.
The
data analysis method in this test starts from collecting secondary data taken
from the annual reports of manufacturing companies, the official website of the
Jakarta Stock Exchange which is accessed from www.idx.co.id and also from
Thomson Reuters. Then calculate the required financial ratios, then enter the
results of the ratio calculation into the Springate
S-Score and Altman Z-Score formulas to identify and categorize the financial
conditions of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in
2016 and 2020.
Variables
and Measurements
1.
Working Capital to
Total Asset Ratio
Calculating
liquidity from total assets to working capital. If the working capital is
greater, it is expected that the company's operational activities will be
smoother so that it can increase profits.
Working
Capital/Total Asset
2.
Earnings Before
Interest and Taxes to Total Asset Ratio
Measuring
the ability to manage resources effectively, by looking at the results of sales
and investments (Sarbapriya Ray, 2011)
Earnings
Before Interest and Taxes/Total Asset
3.
Earnings Before Taxes to
Current Liabilities Ratio
Measuring
the company's ability to generate profits from total short-term liabilities.
Profit
Before Interest/Current Liabilities
4.
Sales to Total Asset
Ratio
Measuring
the company's ability to generate sales from the total assets owned.
Sales/Total
Assets
5.
Retained Earnings to
Total Asset Ratio
This
ratio will show how much the company's ability to generate retained earnings
from the total assets owned by the company.
Retained
Earnings/Total Assets
6.
Market Value of Equity
to Total Liabilities Ratio
This
ratio measures the company's ability to guarantee each of its debts through its
own capital.
Market
Value of Equity/Total Liabilities
Population and Sample
Population
This
study collects financial information from all manufacturing companies listed on
the IDX official website in 2020.
Sample
Purposive
sampling was used, and the following criteria:
1. Previously,
companies were divided into two categories: healthy and depressed. According to
Zhang (2007), companies experiencing financial difficulties will have negative
retained earnings.
2. For the
5th consecutive year, the company has issued a complete financial report.
From the
2 criteria above, the number of samples to be studied is 113 companies and a
5-year period, or a total of 565 firm-years, of which 131 firm-years are
grouped as companies experiencing distress due to having negative retained
earnings.
Analysis And Discussion
In this study, the object of research is a manufacturing
company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2020 with complete
information required by researchers. Data is taken from annual reports
published by companies and accessed directly from the official website of each
company and from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange. In
addition, the data is also taken from Thomson Reuters. With the specified
criteria, the number of samples that meet the requirements are:
Table 1
IDX listed manufacturing company in 2020 |
190 |
Newly registered manufacturing company
after 2016 |
(46) |
Manufacturing companies that were
delisted in the research period |
(9) |
Manufacturing companies with incomplete
data |
(22) |
Total companies to be researched |
113 |
Research data period |
5 years |
Total sample |
565 |
The Indonesia Stock Exchange recorded that there were 190
manufacturing companies in 2020 of which 46 had just taken the floor after 2016
so they did not have complete data for 5 consecutive years, 9 others were
officially removed from trading by the Indonesia Stock Exchange (delisting) and
22 companies others do not have the required
completeness of data so that only 113 companies will be used as samples in this
study with a period of 5 financial years. The total data to be observed is 565
data.
Springate
Method
In classifying companies into 2 categories, healthy or
bankrupt, it is necessary to calculate each variable. This model has 4
variables, namely (1) Working Capital To Total Assets,
(2) EBIT To Total Assets, (3) EBT To Current Liabilities, and (4) Total Sales
to Total Assets. The formula for the Springate model
is:
S = 1.03A + 3.07B +
0.66C + 0.4D
Descriptive Statistics of Working Capital To
Total Assets (A) Springate Method
A |
|
Mean |
0.164 |
Median |
0.177 |
Standard Deviation |
0.485 |
Maximum |
1.681 |
Minimum |
-4.538 |
Descriptive Statistics of Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
to Total Assets (B) Springate Method
B |
|
Mean |
0.068 |
Median |
0.058 |
Standard Deviation |
0.112 |
Maximum |
0.626 |
Minimum |
-0.948 |
Descriptive Statistics of Earnings Before Taxes to Current
Liabilities (C) Springate Method
C |
|
Mean |
0.327 |
Median |
0.153 |
Standard Deviation |
0.613 |
Maximum |
5.035 |
Minimum |
-1.551 |
Descriptive Statistics of Sales to Total Assets (D) Springate Method
D |
|
Mean |
0.984 |
Median |
0.854 |
Standard Deviation |
0.716 |
Maximum |
8.429 |
Minimum |
0.006 |
After calculating the 4 required ratios, these ratios are
entered into the available S-Score formula. The Springate
model groups companies into 2 categories, namely healthy and bankrupt with a
cut-off point of 0.862. If the S-Score calculation results above 0.862, then
the company is categorized as a healthy company. Conversely, if the obtained S-Score is less than 0.862, then the company
is categorized as a bankrupt company or has financial problems. From 565
observations, the results of grouping manufacturing companies according to the
S-Score are as follows:
S-Score |
|
Healthy |
282 |
Bankrupt |
283 |
Altman Method
Slightly different from the Springate
model, the Altman model groups companies into 3 categories, namely healthy,
gray zone and bankrupt. This grouping is based on the results of the
calculation of each variable. Altman's model has 5 variables, namely (1)
Working Capital To Total Asset Ratio, (2) Retained
Earnings To Total Asset Ratio, (3) Earnings Before Interest and Taxes To Total
Assets Ratio, (4) Market Value of Equity to Total Liabilities Ratio, and (5)
Sales to Total Assets Ratio. The formula for the Altman model is:
Z = 1.2X1 + 1.4X2 +
3.3X3 + 0.6X4 + 0.99X5
Descriptive Statistics of Working Capital to Total Assets (X1)
Altman Method
X1 |
|
Mean |
0.164 |
Median |
0.177 |
Standard Deviation |
0.485 |
Maximum |
1.681 |
Minimum |
-4.538 |
Descriptive Statistics of Retained Earnings to Total Assets
(X2) Altman Method
X2 |
|
Mean |
0.053 |
Median |
0.193 |
Standard Deviation |
1.015 |
Maximum |
0.825 |
Minimum |
-9.622 |
Descriptive Statistics of Earning Before Interest and Taxes To Total Assets (X3) Altman Method
X3 |
|
Mean |
0.068 |
Median |
0.057 |
Standard Deviation |
0.112 |
Maximum |
0.626 |
Minimum |
-0.948 |
Descriptive Statistics of Market Value of Equity to Total
Liabilities (X4) Altman Method
X4 |
|
Mean |
4.180 |
Median |
1.307 |
Standard Deviation |
14.012 |
Maximum |
295.986 |
Minimum |
0.009 |
Descriptive Statistics of Sales to Total Assets (X5)
Altman Method
X5 |
|
Mean |
0.984 |
Median |
0.854 |
Standard Deviation |
0.716 |
Maximum |
8.429 |
Minimum |
0.006 |
After calculating the required 5 ratios, similar to
the Springate model, these ratios are entered into
the available Z-Score formulas. Altman's model groups companies into 3
categories, namely healthy, gray zone and bankrupt where if the Z value is
below 1.8 then the company is categorized as a company that is experiencing
financial difficulties. If the Z value is between 1.81 and 2.99, then the
company is categorized as a company that is in the gray zone. Companies that
are in this zone are expected to improve their performance so that they can
return to health. Finally, if the Z value is above 2.99, then the company is
categorized as a healthy company. From 565 observations, the results of
grouping manufacturing companies according to the Z-Score are as follows:
Z-Score |
|
Healthy |
236 |
Gray Zone |
135 |
Bankrupt |
194 |
Model Comparative Analysis
After
performing calculations using two different models and grouping the companies
studied, the table below presents the overall grouping results.
S-Score |
Z-Score |
|
Sehat |
282 |
235 |
Zona Abu-Abu |
- |
136 |
Bangkrut |
283 |
194 |
Based
on the table above, it can be seen that the most-healthy condition is seen in
the Springate model group. In the previous chapter,
it was stated that this research consisted of 565 firm-years and there were 434
companies categorized as companies with healthy financial conditions. If seen
from table 4.13, the Springate model with the
most-healthy conditions compared to the Altman model which recorded fewer
healthy companies.
The
overall calculation can be concluded that if you look at the results of the
calculation of bankruptcy predictions, the Altman method provides a smaller
number of bankruptcy predictions, but provides an early warning for companies
in the gray zone to improve company performance so that it does not lead to
bankruptcy. As for the Springate method, it provides a
larger bankruptcy prediction number but does not provide early detection as is
done by the Altman method.
Comparative
analysis of the model was carried out by comparing the results of the Altman
and Springate categorization methods and seeing the consistency
of the results of each method when compared to the initial categorization. This
analysis was conducted to determine the level of consistency of each method. A
method is said to be consistent if the method categorizes the sample into a
consistent group, where a healthy sample is included in the healthy group and a
distressed sample is included in the bankrupt group. On the other hand, it is
said to be inconsistent if a method is wrong with the sample results, where a
healthy sample is put into a group other than healthy and a sample with
distress is included in a group other than bankrupt.
S-Score |
Z-Score |
|
Consistent |
370 |
340 |
Inconsistent |
195 |
225 |
Total |
565 |
565 |
After
comparing, the results show that the Springate method
groups 370 samples consistently and 195 samples inconsistently from the initial
categorization. While the Altman method grouped 340 samples consistently and
225 samples inconsistently from the initial categorization. From the above
results, it can be concluded that the Springate method
has a higher level of consistency than the Altman method.
After
calculating the overall S-Score and Z-Score values, grouping them according to
the company's financial condition, and looking at the consistency of the model,
a comparison of the mean scores between industries was also carried out to see
the level of financial health by industry in the manufacturing sector with the
following results:
Industry |
Mean
S-Score |
Mean
Z-Score |
Basic and chemical
industry, cement |
0.634 |
4.401 |
Basic and chemical
industry, porcelain and glass |
0.858 |
2.783 |
Basic and chemical
industry, metal, etc |
0.801 |
2.566 |
Basic and chemical
industry, chemical |
1.173 |
2.942 |
Basic and chemical,
plastics and packaging industries |
0.907 |
2.322 |
Basic and chemical
industry, animal feed |
1.313 |
4.355 |
Basic and chemical
industry, wood and its processing |
-0.323 |
-1.662 |
Basic and chemical
industry, pulp and paper |
0.610 |
1.191 |
Basic and chemical
industry, machinery and heavy equipment |
0.962 |
2.722 |
Various industries,
automotive and components |
0.901 |
2.987 |
Miscellaneous
industries, textiles and garments |
0.324 |
3.245 |
Miscellaneous
industry, footwear |
0.797 |
1.817 |
Miscellaneous industry,
cable |
1.195 |
3.041 |
Miscellaneous
industry, electronics |
0.892 |
2.424 |
Consumer goods, food
and beverage industry |
1.603 |
6.587 |
Consumer goods
industry, cigarettes |
1.885 |
9.520 |
Consumer goods
industry, pharmaceutical |
1.637 |
9.266 |
Consumer goods,
cosmetics and household goods industry |
1.204 |
5.519 |
Consumer goods
industry, household appliances |
0.709 |
1.803 |
Based
on the table above, it can be seen that only a few industries are in distress
as seen from the mean S-Score, namely the cement industry, the porcelain and
glass industry, the metal industry and the like, the wood and processing
industry, the pulp and paper industry, the textile and garment industry,
footwear industry and household appliances industry.
Meanwhile,
judging from the mean Z-Score, only a few industries are in distress, namely
the wood and processing industry and the pulp and paper industry. From the table
above, it can be seen that the industry with the highest mean S-Score and mean
Z-Score is the cigarette industry and the industry with the lowest score is the
wood industry and its processing. The calculation results support the statement
from the Central Statistics Agency which states that the manufacturing industry
experienced positive turmoil during the pandemic.
Condition of Sample Company in 2022
The
number of companies that were sampled in this study were 113 companies. The
condition of the sample companies is reviewed in 2022 whether the conditions
are in accordance with the predictions that have been made.
The
review is carried out by checking on the Indonesia Stock Exchange website page.
The results of the last review on 27 May 2022 showed that there were no
companies that were delisted from the stock exchange in 2021, but several
companies received special notations from the Indonesia Stock Exchange,
including: PT Asia Pacific Investama Tbk (MYTX), PT Asia Pacific Fibers Tbk
(POLY), and PT Sri Rejeki Isman
Tbk (SRIL) because the latest financial statements
have negative equity. In addition, a special notation was also given to PT
Pelangi Indah Canindo Tbk
(PICO) due to a request for postponement of debt payment obligations (PKPU).
Conclusion
The following
are conclusions that can be drawn based on the results of the analysis and also
the discussion that has been described in the previous chapter: 1). Calculations
of financial condition carried out by the Springate
and Altman methods on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock
Exchange in 2016-2020 show that the Springate method
groups 282 samples into the healthy category and another 283 into the distress
category. While the Altman method groups 235 samples into the healthy category,
136 samples into the gray zone category, and 194 others into the distress category.
2). The results of the comparison of the two methods show that the Springate method gives results with a greater consistency
value, namely 370 consistent samples and 195 inconsistent samples, while the
Altman method recorded 340 consistent samples and 225 inconsistent samples. 3).
Not all manufacturing companies experience positive stretches during the
pandemic, judging by the numbers and results of the S-Score and Z-Score calculations.
Companies that are able to survive with sound financial conditions are large
and well-known companies. In addition, manufacturing companies in the
pharmaceutical sector appear to have improved in their financial condition,
because quite a lot of people are more concerned about health during the
pandemic.
The
results of this study are expected to contribute to academics and science using
the Springate and Altman methods in predicting the
bankruptcy of manufacturing companies in Indonesia. Some suggestions that can
be given are as follows:
This
study shows that the Springate method is a more
consistent method than the Altman method in calculating distress performed on
manufacturing companies in Indonesia. By predicting bankruptcy, company
management can perform early detection of the company's financial condition so
that top management and decision makers can take anticipatory actions and
develop better strategies so that companies can get out of distress.
This
study also has useful results for shareholders and prospective shareholders in
detecting the possibility of company bankruptcy. Investors and potential
investors can make more careful considerations when choosing which company to
fund so that it will be useful to anticipate losses when choosing a company
that has a high probability of going bankrupt.
Further
research can use company data from other broader industrial sectors besides
manufacturing sector companies and using a larger number of companies or a
longer period of time. Further research can make comparisons of other financial
distress methods which are newer than the Springate
and Altman methods.
BIBLIOGRAFI
Advenia Elisabeth. (2021, Juli
27). From www.idxchannel.com: https://www.idxchannel.com/economics/manufaktur-tetap-menggeliat-saat-pandemi-ekonom-kimia-dan-farmasi-paling-pesat
Altman, E. I.,
Zhang, L., & Y en,
J. (2007). Corporate Financial Distress Diagnosis in China. Salomon Center Working
Paper, (November)
Astrid Faidlatul Habibah. (2022, Februari 7). From www.antaranews.com: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2688377/bps-5-sektor-dominasi-kontribusi-pdb-ri-kuartal-iv-2021
Bimo Aryo Seto. 2021. Penggunaan Model Altman Z-Score, Springate,
Zmijewski, dan Grover Dalam
Memprediksi Financial Distress. Jawa Timur: Universitas Pembangunana
Nasional �Veteran�
Bursa Efek Indonesia, 2022. Indonesian Stock Exchange. Diakses 19 Januari 2022, http://www.idx.co.id/.
Danang Sugianto. (2021, Juli 18). From
finance.detik.com: https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-5648250/bagaimana-pengusaha-memandang-ppkm-darurat-diperpanjang
Ferbianasari, Hilda Nia. (2012). Analisis
Penilaian Financial Distress menggunakan
Model Altman Z Score pada Perusahaan Kosmetik Yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia.
Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Malaika. 2019. Analisis Tingkat Akurasi Prediksi Kebangkrutan Metode Altman Z-Score, Springate,
Ohlson Dalam Kondisi Financial
Distress. Yogyakarta: Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
Marisa Fitriani, Nurul Huda. 2020. Analisis
Prediksi Financial Distress Dengan Model Springate (S-Score) pada
PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk. Nusa Tenggara Barat: STIE Bima
Prianto Budi Saptono.
(2014, April 18). From www.transformasi.net: http://www.transformasi.net/articles/read/156/psak-1-penyajian-laporan-keuangan.html
Rahmat. 2020. Analisis Financial Distress Menggunakan Model Altman Z-Score, Springate,
Zmijewski, Grover dan Penilaian
Kesehatan Bank Metode Camel. Bandung: STIE Ekuitas
Reni Lestari.
(2021, November 07). From ekonomi.bisnis.com: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20211107/257/1462947/industri-manufaktur-nantikan-momentum-pertumbuhan-akhir-tahun
Reni Lestari.
(2021, Desember 29). From ekonomi.bisnis.com: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20211229/257/1483121/menperin-beberkan-kunci-manufaktur-bertahan-di-tengah-covid-19
Rully R Ramli. (2021, Juli
14). From Kompas.com: https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/07/14/125547126/bi-cermati-dampak-ppkm-darurat-ke-dunia-usaha
Sarbapriya Ray. 2011. �Assessing Corporate Financial
Distress in Automobile Industry of India: An Application of Altman�s Model�.Research Journal of Finance
and Accounting, Vol 2. No 3.
Copyright holder: Felicia, Maria Ulpah (2022) |
First publication right: Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia |
This article is licensed under: |