Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah
Indonesia p�ISSN: 2541-0849 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol. 7, No. 9, September
2022
DRUG UTILIZATION STUDY OF
CORTICOSTEROID SPARING AGENT IN PEDIATRIC PATIENT WITH LUPUS NEPHRITIS (STUDY AT
PEDIATRIC DEPARTMENT OF DR. SOETOMO TEACHING HOSPITAL, SURABAYA)
Chatarina Widianti,
Yulistiani, Ninik Asmaningsih Soemyarso
Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
Dr. Soetomo General
Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
Email: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Abstract
Lupus nephritis occurs mostly in children. The main therapy used is
long-term corticosteroids that can lead to organ damage, which should be
treated by providing corticosteroid sparing agent; to control the underlying
disease and reduce the side effects of corticosteroid therapy and facilitate
tapering off. This study analyzed the drug utilization profile and the tapering
off pattern of corticosteroid and corticosteroid sparing agents and identified
potential adverse effects of corticosteroid sparing agents in pediatric
patients with LN. The study used observational method that was analyzed
descriptively on 37 patients with hospitalization period of January 2016 until
December 2017. The profile of corticosteroid sparing agent in patients with LN
was a combination of oral MMF and oral chloroquine. Oral cyclosporine A was
added if persistent proteinuria> 1 g / day / 1.73 m2 after three months of
therapy and combination of IV CPA pulse and oral chloroquine. The tapering off
pattern of oral prednisone in the presence of corticosteroid sparing agent was
in accordance with the Clinical Practice Guide, which was decrease of 5 mg/day
every month. Actual adverse effects included leucopenia (34%), hepatotoxicity
(13%), GIT disorders (45%), and several potential adverse effects. The
utilization of corticosteroid sparing agent in pediatric patients with LN in
Dr. Soetomo Hospital was in accordance with Clinical
Practice Guide (PPK) issued by Dr. Soetomo General
Hospital. Both regular monitoring of patients as well as enhanced interprofessional
collaboration are required to monitor adverse effects of corticosteroid sparing
agents.
Keywords: social media and online;
Jakarta Dance Week; art; audience development
Introduction
Lupus nephritis
(LN) is a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
characterized by the buildup of immune complexes in the glomerulus. LN is
initiated by the activation of T cells and B cells that are autoreactive,
resulting in potential pathogenic effects (Lech & Anders, 2013) and (Furie et al., 2014). LN
therapy aims to control symptoms, reduce flares, protect the kidneys, prevent
complications, and most importantly, reduce the rate of mortality (Mok, 2015).
However, the primary method of LN therapy uses corticosteroids regularly in a
long-term duration. This can cause resistance and side effects of hypothalamic�pituitary�adrenal
axis (HPA Axis) suppression that leads to organ damage (Lightstone et al., 2018).
Therefore, it is necessary to give corticosteroid sparing agents after some
time, namely drugs that reduces the dose (tapering off) of corticosteroids,
which consequently reduces the side effects of corticosteroid therapy and
control the primary disease (LN) [5, 6].
LN occurs in
many children. In general, LN that begins before age 18 includes
childhood-onset or pediatric lupus/juvenile SLE. According to research
conducted by Tarr et al., out of 342 adult and 79 pediatric SLE patients, the
prevalence of adult LN sufferers was 26.4%, while children was 39.2% (Tarr et al., 2015).
Meanwhile, according to research conducted by Kamphuis and Silverman, the
prevalence of SLE sufferers in children is 3.3-8.8/100,000 children, and 80% of
them are female (Kamphuis & Silverman, 2010).
LN is a
progressive autoimmune disease that must be treated appropriately. In
autoimmune diseases, immune system sensitization occurs by endogenous proteins
that are considered foreign proteins, thus stimulating the formation of
antibodies or developing T cells that can react with endogenous antigens. The
therapy that is generally given is immunosuppressants with the principle of
suppressing the immune response. Giving corticosteroids as the primary therapy
can prevent the progression of the disease quickly and effectively, but it also
causes adverse side effects (Lightstone et al., 2018).
Serious side effects can be inflicted on pediatric patients, such as growth
retardation, failure in protein metabolism, hyperglycemia, hypertension in children,
fluid retention, full moon face, gastrointestinal disorders, and osteoporosis
[9].
The toxic
effects of corticosteroids in long-term use or resistant patients should be
reduced by providing an alternative drug (sparing agent) that also serves as immunosuppressants
(Chu, Sartorelli, Katzung, Masters, & Trevor, 2007).
Drugs often used as corticosteroid-sparing agents are azathioprine, mofetil
mycophenolate, hydroxychloroquine, and cyclophosphamide (Indonesia, 2011).
Therapy on LN
using corticosteroids requires tapering off to avoid organ damage and gives the
body a chance to produce endogenous corticosteroids that are important in
metabolism [11]. Tapering patterns can vary, depending on the doses that are
used. Based on a research conducted by Ueda et al. [12], a decrease in doses in
long-term corticosteroid use indicates lower and safer levels of relapsing in
pediatric nephrotic syndrome patients. In comparison, the decrease in doses
which are carried out irregularly indicates higher levels of relapse [12].
Usage of
corticosteroids in a long-term therapy should be reduced gradually, starting
with a decrease in the dose of corticosteroids before being discontinued [13].
Sudden discontinuation of corticosteroids will lead to impaired HPA Axis
function and re-emergence of symptoms, such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting,
orthostatic hypotension, and hypoglycemia [15]. This dose reduction process
(tapering off) takes about 2-12 months (Chu et al., 2007).
Tapering is done based on doctors� personal views and practical experience
[16]. As an example, for tapering off prednisone doses of more than 40 mg/day,
a decrease of 5-10 mg every 1-2 weeks is performed until a dose of 20-40 mg/day
is reached. After that, it is lowered again by 1.0-2.5 mg/day every 2-3 weeks
when the dose of prednisone <20 mg/day. Low dosage is still maintained to
control the disease (Indonesia, 2011).
Besides
corticosteroids, other immunosuppressants also cause side effects. For example,
cyclophosphamide (CPA) with large doses can cause the risk of myelosuppressive,
lymphoproliferative disorders, malignancies, pancytopenia, hemorrhagic cystitis,
and secondary infertility (Chu et al., 2007).
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can cause gastrointestinal disorders (diarrhea,
nausea, or vomiting) and hematology (leukopenia, red cell aplasia) and
increases the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and progressive
multifocal leukoencephalopathy (Krensky, Bennett, & Vincenti, 2011).
Azathioprine (AZA) can cause bone marrow suppression, including leukopenia,
thrombocytopenia, or anemia. It can also cause susceptibility to infection
(particularly varicella and herpes simplex viruses), hepatotoxicity, alopecia,
gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, pancreatitis, and an increased risk of
neoplasia (Krensky et al., 2011).
The numerous
types of immunosuppressants given as corticosteroid-sparing agents have different
working mechanisms, and consequently results in a variety of effects.
Therefore, the profile and effects of corticosteroid-sparing agent for
pediatric LN patients are important to be studied. This includes the type of
drug given, dosage, frequency, and length of use. This study is expected to be
used as additional information material for LN therapy and a reference for
improved hospital drug management. In addition, health practitioners can use
the results of this study as a therapeutic evaluation and supervision of drug
use for patients with LN.
Research Methods
The study conducted is an observational study. The study was
conducted retrospectively using data in the past. The purpose of this study was
to review the profile of drug use in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with
LN at the pediatric ward in Dr. Soetomo General
Hospital. Analysis of research results was done descriptively. The population
in this study was patients diagnosed with LN who were not accompanied by
comorbid and were undergoing hospitalization in the Pediatric Unit at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital. The samples used in the study
were pediatric patients diagnosed with LN and met the inclusion criteria and
were limited by time during the period January 2016 to December 2017. The inclusion
criteria in this study were pediatric patients with a final diagnosis of
uncomplicated LN who received immunosuppressant therapy with complete data
related to dose, route of administration, and frequency of administration in
the Pediatric Unit at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital. A
non-random sampling technique determines the sample. Sampling is performed
through a retrospective method, while making sure that the desired research
factors are contained in the sample data. The research sample will be obtained
from patients� medical records. The data consisted of patient demographics,
including medical record number, patient initials, gender, weight, age,
significant complaints, diagnosis results, accompanying diseases, and history
of drug use. In addition, clinical data includes examining cytokine profiles, and
drug therapy received, for example, the type, route, dose, frequency of use,
and side effects that appear. From the data obtained, a descriptive analysis
between the data and the results of the immune complex examination was
presented. Data was presented in the form of descriptions, tables, and
diagrams. Analysis of the actual and potential side effects of
corticosteroid-sparing agents were presented in the form of descriptions and
tables.
Result and Discussion
Patient Gender Profile
Based on the data
obtained from 37 pediatric patients with LN, there were 23 female patients
(62%) and 14 male patients (38%). Table 1 below shows the gender distribution
diagram of a pediatric LN patients.
Table 1 Sex distribution table of pediatric
LN patients that used corticosteroid sparing agents for therapy
Gender |
Percentage of patients (%) |
Male |
38 |
Female |
62 |
Patient Age Profile
According to the
American Academy of Pediatrics 2012, the age in children can be classified into
three categories, namely infants (0-2 years), children (2-12 years), and
adolescents (12-18 years). Table 2 below showed the age profile of pediatric LN
patients in the study. Most of the LN patients are classified into adolescents
aged 12-18 years.
Table 2 Age distribution table of pediatric LN patients
that used corticosteroid sparing agents in their therapy
Age (year) |
Percentage of patients (%) |
2 - < 12 |
32 |
12-18 |
68 |
Clinical Manifestations
Systemic lupus
erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with various clinical
manifestations that can attack various organs, one of which is the kidneys (as
in the case for LN). The initial criteria for a diagnosis of SLE were
determined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1971 but were
updated in 1997. These criteria aim to classify the disease and distinguish SLE
patients from healthy people. Clinical manifestations of SLE patients include
skin lesions, arthritis, kidney abnormalities, neurological abnormalities, and
hematological changes (Yu, Gershwin, & Chang, 2014).
Data in Table 3 shows the clinical manifestation based on the ACR criteria to
confirm the initial SLE diagnosis of the patients. Out of the 37 patients,
these symptoms were found in 18 patients (49%), while 19 patients (51%) were
not symptomatic.
Table 3 Clinical manifestation profile based on ACR criteria in pediatric LN
patients *each patient can experience
more than one clinical manifestation
Clinical manifestations* |
Percentage of patients (%) |
Not
recorded |
51 |
Discoid
rash |
11 |
Neurological
disorder |
33 |
Serosity |
39 |
Immunological
disorder |
39 |
Photosensitivity |
44 |
Arthritis |
50 |
Malar
rash |
56 |
Mouth
ulcer |
61 |
Antinuclear
Antibody |
78 |
Hematological
disorder |
89 |
Kidney
disorder |
100 |
Patients suffering
from LN may experience immune complex deposits in other tissues, which reflects
the symptoms of SLE disease itself. Clinical manifestations can be observed from
the patient�s complaints at the time of hospital admission, in which the most
cases are nausea, vomiting, and fever.
Corticosteroid Therapy
Pattern using Sparing Agents
Immunosuppressant therapy is the primary therapy in LN with two phases,
namely the induction and maintenance phases. Methylprednisolone (MP) Pulse is
used every 2-4 weeks in the induction phase as many as six cycles combined with
corticosteroid sparing agents, namely CPA Pulse or MMF and cyclosporin A. Based
on the guideline, patients who use MMF as a corticosteroid sparing agent in the
maintenance phase will be lowered slowly to reach the lowest dose to maintain
remission conditions. On the other hand, patients who use CPA as a
corticosteroid sparing agent will undergo therapy for 24 months. Of the 37
patients, the complete data of dose lowering and duration of sparing agents was
not found in eight patients.
Steroid administration needs to be combined with sparing agents (MMF,
calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and cyclophosphamide) to minimize long-term
steroid side effects. The recommended combinations are (1) steroids + MMF �
CNI; and (2) steroids + CPA. Oral MMF begins simultaneously as MP pulse at a
dose of 600 mg/m2/dose every 12 hours (15-23 mg/kg/dose every 12
hours) with a maximum dose of 1 g per 12 hours. In addition, oral cyclosporine
A may be added if there is a persistent proteinuria > 1 g/day/1.73 m2
after three months of therapy with normal serum creatinine. The protocol of LN
therapy using corticosteroid sparing agents based on Clinical Practice
Guideline can be seen in Table 4.
Table 1 Corticosteroid sparing agent protocol for therapy in pediatric LN
patients
Therapeutic Patterns |
Corticosteroid sparing agent |
Dosage and Frequency |
Dosage and Frequency of
Administration |
Dosage Suitability |
Length of Therapy |
Information |
Number of patients (percentage) |
Book |
|||||||
Steroids + MMF and/ or Cyclosporine A |
|||||||
Induction Phase (6 months) |
MMF |
600 mg/m2/dose every 12 hours (15-23
mg/kg/dose every 12 hours)1 |
15-23 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours |
Appropriate |
Every day |
It starts with MP pulse. |
4 (11 %) |
Cyclosporin A |
3-6 mg/kg/day (dose every 12 hours) to achieve
cyclosporine A blood levels of 150-200 μg/L1 |
3-6 mg/kg/day (dose every 12 hours) |
Appropriate |
3-6 months and terminated when complete remission
is stamped |
Added if there is persistent proteinuria >1
g/day/1.73m2after three months of therapy with normal serum
creatinine |
||
Chloroquine |
3 mg/kg/day1 |
3 mg/kg/day |
Appropriate |
Every day |
Given for one month each cycle |
||
Maintenance phase |
MMF |
600 mg/m2/dose every 12 hours (15-23
mg/kg/dose every 12 hours)1 |
|
Appropriate |
Every day |
Lowered dose slowly to the lowest dose that can
maintain remission conditions |
1 (3 %) |
Cyclosporin A |
Lowered dose slowly1 |
|
Appropriate |
Until remission is reached |
Lowered dose slowly until remission, considered
to be discontinued |
||
Chloroquine |
3 mg/kg/day1 |
3 mg/kg/day |
Appropriate |
Every day |
Given for one month each cycle |
||
Steroids + CPA |
|||||||
Induction Phase (6 months) |
CPA Pulse |
500-1000 mg/m2 2 |
500-1000 mg/m2 |
Appropriate |
Given every 4 weeks as many as 6 cycles |
To suppress the progressivity of the underlying
disease |
12 (32 %) |
Chloroquine |
3 mg/kg/day |
3 mg/kg/day |
Appropriate |
Every day |
Given for one month each cycle |
||
Maintenance phase (24 months) |
CPA Pulse |
500-1000 mg/m2 2 |
500-1000 mg/m2 |
Appropriate |
every 3 months for 24 months |
To suppress the progressivity of the underlying
disease |
20 (54 %) |
Chloroquine |
3 mg/kg/day |
3 mg/kg/day |
Appropriate |
Every day |
Given for one month each cycle |
\MMF = Mycophenolate mofetil;
CPA = Cyclophosphamide
1 Clinical Practice Guideline
of Pediatric Unit at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital
2 Bircan
and Kara [20]
According to the
National Institute of Health (NIH) in 2003, the use of a combination of oral
prednisone with CPA pulse IV provides better kidney protection, reduces the
incidence of relapsing, and prevents the onset of CKD and ESRD compared to
prednisone monotherapy alone [21]. In addition, chloroquine is also given to
prevent and reduce the spread of lupus disease to other organs, help reduce the
incidence of flares, and help modulate the immune system by preventing plasmacytoid
dendritic cell activation, so it is recommended for long-term therapy in lupus
patients.
Oral Prednisone Usage
Profile and Tapering Off Pattern
Oral prednisone
is used after the patient gets MP pulse IV for maintenance so that there are no
flares or recurrences. Oral prednisone is used daily and tapering off so that
there is no steroid withdrawal effect without tapering off from one of the
corticosteroids sparing agents. The profile of oral prednisone and its tapering
off pattern can be seen in Table 5.
Table 2 Profile of oral prednisone use and tapering off patterns
Number Patient |
BW (kg) |
Dosage and Frequency |
Grant Time |
Sparing Agent |
8 |
36,9 |
1
x 20 mg |
0.5
months |
Cyclophosphamide |
1
x 15 mg |
0.5
months |
|||
10 |
48 |
1
x 50 mg |
0.5
months |
Cyclophosphamide |
1
x 45 mg |
0.5
months |
|||
1
x 40 mg |
1
month |
|||
1
x 35 mg |
0.5
months |
|||
1
x 30 mg |
0.5
months |
|||
11 |
58 |
1
x 20 mg |
1
month |
Cyclophosphamide |
1
x 15 mg |
1
month |
|||
1
x 10 mg |
1
month |
|||
1
x 5 mg |
0.5
months |
|||
1
x 5 mg (AD) |
1.5
months |
|||
23 |
43 |
1
x 40 mg |
0.5
months |
Cyclophosphamide |
1
x 35 mg |
0.5
months |
|||
29 |
32,4 |
1
x 35 mg |
1
month |
Cyclophosphamide |
1
x 30 mg |
1
month |
|||
31 |
36,5 |
1
x 35 mg |
1
month |
Cyclophosphamide |
1
x 30 mg |
1
month |
|||
32 |
29 |
1
x 30 mg |
0.5
months |
Cyclophosphamide |
1
x 25 mg |
0.5
months |
|||
37 |
19,5 |
1
x 15 mg |
1
month |
Cyclophosphamide |
1
x 10 mg |
1
month |
|||
1
x 5 mg |
1
month |
|||
1
x 5 mg (AD) |
1
month |
BW = body weight; AD =
alternating dose
1 Oral prednisone begins at a
dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg/day and then gradually lowered by 5mg/day within one month
after administration of MP pulse and depends on disease activity.
2 Dose of 1 prednisone tablet
= 5 mg; AD Alternate dose (not taken every day but one day)
Potential and Actual Side
Effects of Corticosteroid Sparing Agent
Side effects are
a drug problem often experienced by pediatric LN patients who uses
corticosteroid sparing agent therapy. In this study, the actual side effects of
corticosteroid sparing agents were seen from clinical data or lab data after
the drug was given. In contrast, potential side effects are seen based on
libraries and can potentially occur in all patients who use corticosteroid
sparing agents. However, not all the data were written in medical records. In
addition, all side effects that occur can overlap with the activity of LN. The
potential side effects of corticosteroid sparing agent can be seen in Table 6.
Table 6. Actual and potential side effects on the use of
corticosteroid sparing agents during LN therapy
Types of corticosteroid
sparing agents |
Side Effects |
Number of patients |
Recommendations |
|
Potential Side Effect |
Actual Side Effect |
|||
Cyclophosphamide |
Leucopenia |
- |
14 |
-
Routine WBC monitoring2 |
(n = 32) |
-
Reduce the cumulative dose of CPA2 |
|||
|
Hepatotoxicity |
- |
5 |
Monitoring ALT/AST2 |
|
Risk of infection |
32 |
- |
-
Maintaining personal and environmental hygiene2 |
|
-
Avoiding leukopenia2 |
|||
|
Gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea) |
32 |
- |
Provide anti-vomiting therapy |
|
Hemorrhagic cystitis |
32 |
- |
Increase the frequency of bowel movements, drink
plenty of water, and |
|
Using diuretic therapy2 |
|||
MMF |
Gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea) |
- |
1 |
Divide the daily dose by 2 or 3 times2 |
(n = 5) |
Leucopenia |
- |
1 |
-
The daily dose does not exceed two grams2 |
|
-
Monitoring of white blood cells every week in the first month of
administration |
|||
|
Risk of infection |
5 |
- |
-
Maintaining personal and environmental hygiene |
|
-
Avoiding leukopenia2 |
|||
Chloroquine |
Gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea) |
- |
8 |
Administration of drugs with food, split into 2
doses1 |
(n = 32) |
Retinal toxicity (retinopathy) |
32 |
- |
Essential eye examination before or within one
year of the start of treatment |
|
||||
Cyclosporin A |
Nephrotoxicity |
2 |
- |
Monitoring serum creatinine levels every 4-6
weeks, if increased by 25%, lower the dose by 20% |
(n = 2) |
Neurological symptoms (tremors, headaches) |
2 |
- |
|
|
Hirsutism and gum hypertrophy |
2 |
- |
WBC = white blood cells; ALT
= alanine transaminase; AST = aspartate transaminase; MMF = mycophenolate
mofetil
1 Marmor et al. [22]
2 Moroni et al. [23]
Based on the
patient�s demographic data in Table 1, it is shown that female pediatric LN
patients are higher than male (62% vs 38%). These results agree with previous
literature results. According to Hermansen et al. [24], LN are more prevalent
in females than males. According to Sinha and Raut [6], 80% of LN patients are
women. One of the factors that affect is hormonal factors. In females, higher
estrogen concentration aids the expression of autoimmune phenotypes, such that
more autoreactive B cells can attack other lymphocytes. Thus, females are more
susceptible to SLE [14].
In Table 2, it
is shown that the age distribution of pediatric LN patients is mostly in the
age range of 12-18 years (adolescent category) and there were no patients aged
below 5 years. These results also agree with previous research, which stated
that the average onset of SLE appearance is at the ages of 11 and 12 years, and
rarely at the age of <5 years [25]. Furthermore, the number of patients in
the adolescent age range is associated with the influence of the onset of steroid
sex hormones that play a role in the pathogenesis of lupus [26].
Clinical
manifestations in pediatric SLE patients vary. In general, nonspecific symptoms
appear, such as feelings of unwellness and weakness, pain, episodic fever,
anorexia, nausea, weight loss, and the butterfly-shaped redness of the face for
several weeks or months [29]. For initial diagnosis in SLE patients, 11
criteria have been established by the American College of Rheumatology in 1997,
in four criteria must at least be met. The eleven criteria are 1) malar rash,
2) discoid rash, 3) photosensitivity, 4) mouth ulceration, 5) arthritis, 6)
serositis, 7) kidney abnormalities, 8) neurological disorders, 9) hematological
abnormalities, 10) immunological abnormalities, and 11) positive antinuclear
antibodies (Yu et al., 2014).
In Table 3, the most common clinical manifestations are kidney and
hematological disorders. Clinical manifestations could overlap with disease
activity and the side effects of immunosuppressant therapy.
The therapy for
LN is divided into two phases: induction phase, helps control the disease by
inducing the cure/cessation of disease flares. At this stage, diseases that
threaten organ damage and life should be treated seriously. The second phase is
maintenance phase, in which the patient is kept from experiencing relapse and
controlling the disease by avoiding inflammation and damage [6].
WBC = white blood cells; ALT
= alanine transaminase; AST = aspartate transaminase; MMF = mycophenolate
mofetil
1 Marmor et al. [22]
2 Moroni et al. [23]
Based on the
patient�s demographic data in Table 1, it is shown that female pediatric LN
patients are higher than male (62% vs 38%). These results agree with previous
literature results. According to Hermansen et al. [24], LN are more prevalent
in females than males. According to Sinha and Raut [6], 80% of LN patients are
women. One of the factors that affect is hormonal factors. In females, higher
estrogen concentration aids the expression of autoimmune phenotypes, such that
more autoreactive B cells can attack other lymphocytes. Thus, females are more
susceptible to SLE [14].
In Table 2, it
is shown that the age distribution of pediatric LN patients is mostly in the
age range of 12-18 years (adolescent category) and there were no patients aged
below 5 years. These results also agree with previous research, which stated
that the average onset of SLE appearance is at the ages of 11 and 12 years, and
rarely at the age of <5 years [25]. Furthermore, the number of patients in
the adolescent age range is associated with the influence of the onset of steroid
sex hormones that play a role in the pathogenesis of lupus [26].
Clinical
manifestations in pediatric SLE patients vary. In general, nonspecific symptoms
appear, such as feelings of unwellness and weakness, pain, episodic fever,
anorexia, nausea, weight loss, and the butterfly-shaped redness of the face for
several weeks or months [29]. For initial diagnosis in SLE patients, 11
criteria have been established by the American College of Rheumatology in 1997,
in four criteria must at least be met. The eleven criteria are 1) malar rash,
2) discoid rash, 3) photosensitivity, 4) mouth ulceration, 5) arthritis, 6)
serositis, 7) kidney abnormalities, 8) neurological disorders, 9) hematological
abnormalities, 10) immunological abnormalities, and 11) positive antinuclear
antibodies (Yu et al., 2014).
In Table 3, the most common clinical manifestations are kidney and
hematological disorders. Clinical manifestations could overlap with disease
activity and the side effects of immunosuppressant therapy.
The therapy for
LN is divided into two phases: induction phase, helps control the disease by
inducing the cure/cessation of disease flares. At this stage, diseases that
threaten organ damage and life should be treated seriously. The second phase is
maintenance phase, in which the patient is kept from experiencing relapse and
controlling the disease by avoiding inflammation and damage [6].
The induction
phase lasts six months based on the Clinical Practice Guideline of Dr. Soetomo General Hospital. Patients will receive MP Pulse
therapy as much as six cycles (every 2-4 weeks) at a dose of 10-30 mg/kg/day
(maximum 1 gram) for three consecutive days. The procedure of making MP pulse
IV is MP 500 mg or 1000 mg dissolved in NaCl 0.9% 100 ccs and given within 1-3
hours (Indonesia, 2011). MP dose used includes
pulse or supraphysiological (>250 mg/day) doses administered to achieve
rapid therapeutic effects and reduce long-term side effects [30]. In Table 6,
we can see the number of patients undergoing induction therapy on various
cycles. However, there are limitations to the data because the therapy cycle of
some patients is not written in medical records.
After the
induction phase is complete, therapy is continued with long-term therapy
(maintenance phase). Corticosteroid sparing agent is still used but has been
lowered dose to reduce the side effects caused and maintain the condition of
remission [31]. In the maintenance phase, patients continue to use oral
prednisone every day with an initial dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg/day, and the dose is
decreased every month. Prednisone can be converted into a daily interval dose
if proteinuria drops to <0.3 mg/day/1.73 m2 to the lowest dose
that can maintain remission conditions. In patients taking CPA as a
corticosteroid sparing agent, the maintenance phase runs for 24 months.
Patients will receive CPA Pulse every three months, then be discontinued. For
patients taking MMF as a corticosteroid sparing agent, oral MMF will be lowered
slowly until it reaches the lowest dose that can maintain remission conditions
and should not be stopped.
The primary
therapy in LN is by using large doses of corticosteroids in a long-term
duration to suppress the excessive immune response that causes LN. This can
cause resistance and side effects of HPA Axis suppression to lead to organ
damage [4, 32]. Therefore, it is necessary to give corticosteroid sparing agent
from time to time. Inflammatory lesions in LN are acute and can return to
normal with corticosteroid sparing agent therapy [31]. If LN patients
experience relapse while undergoing therapy protocols, it should be reinduced,
by repeating the therapy protocol from the beginning. The pattern of
corticosteroid sparing agent therapy given to pediatric LN patients in this
study refers to Soetomo�s 2017 �Clinical Practice
Guideline� and can be seen in Table 4.
The most
appropriate way to reduce side effects from this high steroid is to slowly
lower the dose of oral prednisone (tapering off) and use the lowest effective
dose (Moroni, Depetri, & Ponticelli, 2016).
In this study, tapering off prednisone doses was already applied regarding the
applicable Clinical Practice Guideline. Oral prednisone begins at a dose of
0.5-1 mg/kg/day daily. It is gradually lowered by 5 mg/day within one month
after administration of MP pulse and depending on disease activity.
Corticosteroid administration for more than two weeks can cause adrenal
suppression. The time it takes for the HPA Axis to return to normal functioning
is 2-12 months, and cortisol levels can return to normal after 6-9 months. If
the dose is lowered too quickly, the withdrawal symptoms will arise, which can
be more severe. In steroid deficiency, the symptoms also appear at normal or
even high cortisol levels, which indicate steroid dependence [15].
Based on the
reference used in Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, a
decrease in oral prednisone dose is carried out for 6-12 months. It can be converted
into a daily interval dose if proteinuria drops to <0.3 mg/day/1.73 m2
and normal serum levels of C3 and C4. The minimum dose to maintain remission
conditions is given as an alternate dose (AD), i.e., corticosteroid
administration every 48 hours [34]. Daily corticosteroid administration causes
HPA axis suppression in most patients, and alternate dose therapy is relatively
safer. Prednisone in the morning aims to mimic the body�s physiological system
that produces high endogenous cortisol in the morning and decreases throughout
the day, thus equating to regular hypothalamic stimulation. Thus, patients can
feel the effectiveness of therapy with minimal side effects [35]. The tapering
pattern of oral prednisone can be seen in Table 5. From this table, it appears
that a reduction in oral prednisone doses of 5 mg/day was performed monthly.
After
administering MP pulse IV, patients are also given sparing agents in the form
of CPA pulse IV or MMF + cyclosporin A. Regular administration of high doses of
CPA IV (3-6 monthly cycles or every two weeks as much as 0.5-1.0 g/ m2)
is an alternative to overcome the toxicity of oral CPA administration [36]. In
other studies, it was said that the effectiveness of MMF and CPA is equally
significant, but MMF provides fewer side effects than CPA (Lech & Anders, 2013). CPA is given at a dose of
500-1000 mg/m2/day each month in the induction phase. To maintain a
state of remission, Intravenous CPA administration along with the use of
prednisolone indicates a cumulative dose and lower recurrence rate [20]. Before
being given CPA, patients receive premedication in the form of ondansetron IV
or metoclopramide IV to overcome complaints of nausea and vomiting related to
the side effects of CPA IV and furosemide IV to overcome the occurrence of
fluid retention. Rehydration is done with the administration of 5% dextrose or
NaCl 0.9% as much as 750 ccs within 3 hours (250 cc/hour) to prevent
complications in the form of hemorrhagic cystitis. CPA is given in 250 cc NaCl
0.9% for 1-2 hours followed by administration of MESNA (sodium 2-mercaptoethanolsulphate)
at 20% of the dose of CPA IV in NaCl 0.9% 50 cc IV drip for 15 minutes (Indonesia, 2011).
Mofetil
mycophenolate and mycophenolic sodium are pre-drugs of mycophenolic acid (MPA)
and are hydrolyzed by esterases into MPA. MPA
administration was found to have lower side effects than CPA (Lech & Anders, 2013). Oral MMF can be given
daily starting at the same time as MP pulse at a dose of 600 mg/m2
every 12 hours (maximum 1 gram every 12 hours with a half-life of 8-16 hours).
MMF and MPS are both hydrolyzed into active mycophenolic acid in the body. The
difference is that the MMF form is made in film-coated tablets and causes
gastrointestinal side effects. At the same time, mycophenolate sodium has been
modified into a form of enteric coated tablet that causes few gastrointestinal
side effects [37]. The preparation of coated tablets require
the drug to be taken as a whole, therefore in some cases, the administration of
MMF to patients are given at different doses. For example, patient A receives
500 mg MMF (1 tablet) in the morning, while at night 1000 mg (2 tablets) are
given because MMF cannot be given at a daily dose of 2 x 750 mg.
American College
of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology
(EULAR) also recommend adjuvant therapy such as chloroquine for long-term
treatment of LN. Based on existing research, in addition to antimalarial
therapy, the use of chloroquine is also renoprotective.
Chloroquine is a weak base that can penetrate lipid cell membranes and is
centered on acidic cytoplasmic vesicles [38]. Changes in the acidic atmosphere
inside the lysosome cause internalization defects. This leads to damage to the
function of macrophages or antigen-presenting cells and modification of immune
response effectors with decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1,
IL-6, and TNF [38]. Since there is an activation of type I IFN system in SLE
patients that is suspected to be triggered by dysregulation of TLRs signaling,
chloroquine can weaken this signaling process that plays a role in LN
pathogenesis and helps reduce the incidence of kidney and non-renal flares [31,
39]. The difference in using chloroquine as an antimalarial and adjuvant
therapy in LN lies in its dose. The dose of chloroquine as an antimalarial is
500 mg orally given once a week, while the dose used for LN therapy is 3
mg/kg/day and can be used daily starting from induction phase therapy. This
study found that oral chloroquine was given to LN patients in the form of
diphosphate with a daily frequency of 1 x with an equivalent dose of 150 mg of
chloroquine base.
When giving corticosteroid
sparing agents to children, the potential side effects need to be monitored
regularly. Long-term use of corticosteroids generally causes Cushing�s
syndrome, which are characterized by weight gain, redistribution of adipose tissue,
and fat accumulation especially on the face (full moon face). Cushing�s
syndrome may occur 1-2 months after the start of corticosteroid therapy and
depends on the dose given and the length of therapy. These side effects are
reversible and may go away after stopping the use of corticosteroids. To
prevent withdrawals, a slow reduction in the dose of corticosteroids (tapering
off) can be done. In some LN patients, the use of low doses of prednisone 5-7.5
mg/day and other corticosteroid sparing agents have maintained remission
conditions (Moroni et al., 2016).
In using CPA,
side effects can include leukopenia, hepatotoxic, gonad toxicity, cystitis
hemorrhage, and increased risk of infection. The risk of malignancy and
infertility may also increase at cumulative doses. In patients who receive CPA
therapy, routine WBC monitoring should be done to avoid leukopenia because CPA
can inhibit bone marrow activity (Moroni et al., 2016).
In addition, CPA metabolic results in acrolein excreted through the kidneys can
induce toxic effects on the bladder epithelium, thus causing hemorrhage
cystitis, fibrosis of the bladder, and bladder cancer. In a study conducted by Houssiau et al. [40], the risk of bladder cancer was 3.6
times greater in patients receiving >36 g of CPA compared to patients who
received <36 g of CPA or did not receive CPA at all. In another retrospective
research, it was also stated that from 1018 patients treated with CPA, less
than 2% of patients had hemorrhagic cystitis after ten months of CPA, and 0.19%
experienced the development of bladder cancer (Yilmaz et al., 2015).
Patients are
asked to drink plenty of fluids or use diuretic therapy to reduce CPA side
effects, so CPA is more comfortable to give in the morning. Another additional
therapy to reduce urotoxicity is mercaptoethanesulfonate
(MESNA), which binds to acrolein and prevents direct contact with the
urogenital (Moroni et al., 2016).
Generally, the dose of CPA given to children is not more than the maximum
cumulative dose of 250 mg/kg (e.g., 2 mg/kg/day for 18 weeks). In men, CPA will
induce oligospermia or permanent azoospermia. While in women, amenorrhea and ovarian
failure can be experienced by patients who use CPA for the long term,
especially in women over the age of 30 years (Moroni et al., 2016).
In addition, CPA can cause an increase in serum transaminases because it can
induce a decrease in cholinesterase activity. However, the disorder will
usually disappear after CPA is stopped. Therefore, serum transaminase
monitoring is required, and if the level is less than 200 U/I, then CPA should
be discontinued (Moroni et al., 2016).
For the usage of
MMF, side effects that often arise are gastrointestinal disorders (nausea,
vomiting, diarrhea), leukopenia, and an increased risk of infection (especially
sepsis due to cytomegalovirus) (Krensky et al., 2011). Side effects increase with
the amount of dose given can be overcome by dividing the dose of MMF in a day
into 2-3 divided doses (Moroni et al., 2016).
Cyclosporine A
is calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) used when patients experience persistent
proteinuria >1 g/day/1.73 m2 after three months of induction
therapy, with normal serum creatinine. Cyclosporin A binds to cyclophilin in
the cytosol, an isomerase enzyme that plays a vital role in protein formation.
This barrier to isomerase activity is thought to be responsible for its immunosuppressant
activity. Cyclophilin is part of immunophilin, a protein that binds to
immunosuppressants [42]. In addition to its immunosuppressive effects,
cyclosporine A can be used to treat proteinuria because it is a selective
afferent constrictor, thereby lowering capillary pressure on the glomerulus.
Common side effects are nephrotoxic neurological symptoms such as tremors and
headaches, hirsutism, and gum hypertrophy. In our study, two patients used
cyclosporine A. The value of proteinuria in one patient cannot be observed,
while in the other, the value was 4+ (> 1000 mg/dL).
From the results
of our study, it is recommended to regularly monitor the pediatric LN patients
for the side effects that can arise from the usage of corticosteroid sparing
agents and other drug therapies. In addition, an increased interprofessional
collaboration between pharmacists and other health workers needs to be done. It
is important for pharmacists to improve their knowledge on patients related to
corticosteroid sparing agent drugs in pediatric LN patients so that optimal
therapy can be achieved as well as to minimize drug-related problems for
patients.
Conclusion
Corticosteroid sparing agent in
pediatric LN patients is oral MMF and oral chloroquine with steroids, and under
certain conditions may be added cyclosporine A oral
and combination CPA pulse and oral chloroquine with steroids.
In the 6-month induction phase, oral
MMF is started at the same time as MP pulse at a dose of 600 mg/m2/12hours
(15-23 mg/kg/12 hours), and under certain conditions, cyclosporine A oral at a dose of 3-6 mg/kg/day every 12 hours. CPA pulse
is given intravenously at a dose of 500-1000 mg/m2 every four weeks as many as
six cycles. In the maintenance phase, MMF dose will be lowered slowly until the
patient reach a state of remission and should not be stopped. In patients
taking cyclosporine A, it is lowered slowly until it reaches remission and will
be considered for discontinuation. While in the use of CPA pulse, will be given
intravenously every three months for 24 months, then discontinued.
The pattern of tapering off oral
prednisone and corticosteroid sparing agent used daily follows applicable
clinical practice guidelines, namely a decrease in prednisone of 5 mg/day each
month to a minimum dose that can maintain a state of remission. Meanwhile,
tapering off corticosteroid sparing agents was not found in the study.
The side effects for each
corticosteroid sparing agents are mentioned in the following: For the use of
cyclophosphamide, they are leukopenia (14%) and hepatotoxicity (13%). For the
use of MMF, they are gastrointestinal (GIT) disorders (20%) and leukopenia
(20%). For the use of chloroquine, it is GIT disorder (25%). In comparison,
potential side effects on the use of CPA are the risk of infection, GIT
disorders and hemorrhagic cystitis. For MMF it is the risk of infection. In
addition, for the use of chloroquine is retinal toxicity, while for the use of
cyclosporine A is nephrotoxicity.
Chu, Edward, Sartorelli, Alan C., Katzung, B. G.,
Masters, S. B., & Trevor, A. J. (2007). Basic and clinical pharmacology. Cancer
Chemotherapy. 10th Ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 878�907.
Furie, Richard, Nicholls, Kathy, Cheng,
Tien‐Tsai, Houssiau, Frederic, Burgos‐Vargas, Ruben, Chen, Shun‐Le,
Hillson, Jan L., Meadows‐Shropshire, Stephanie, Kinaszczuk, Michael,
& Merrill, Joan T. (2014). Efficacy and safety of abatacept in lupus
nephritis: a twelve‐month, randomized, double‐blind study. Arthritis
& Rheumatology, 66(2), 379�389.
Indonesia, Perhimpunan Reumatologi. (2011).
Diagnosis dan pengelolaan lupus eritematosus sistemik. Jakarta: IRA.
Kamphuis, Sylvia, & Silverman, Earl D.
(2010). Prevalence and burden of pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Nature
Reviews Rheumatology, 6(9), 538�546.
Krensky, M. A., Bennett, M. W., &
Vincenti, Flavio. (2011). Immunosuppressants, tolerogens and immunostimulants. Brunton
LL, 1005�1031.
Lech, Maciej, & Anders, Hans Joachim.
(2013). The pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Journal of the American Society
of Nephrology, 24(9), 1357�1366.
Lightstone, Liz, Doria, Andrea, Wilson,
Hannah, Ward, Frank L., Larosa, Maddalena, & Bargman, Joanne M. (2018). Can
we manage lupus nephritis without chronic corticosteroids administration? Autoimmunity
Reviews, 17(1), 4�10.
Mok, Chi Chiu. (2015). Mycophenolate
mofetil for lupus nephritis: an update. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology,
11(12), 1353�1364.
Moroni, Gabriella, Depetri, Federica, &
Ponticelli, Claudio. (2016). Lupus nephritis: when and how often to biopsy and
what does it mean? Journal of Autoimmunity, 74, 27�40.
Tarr, T�nde, D�rfalvi, Be�ta, Győri,
N., Sz�nt�, Ant�nia, Siminszky, Z., Malik, A., Szabo, A. J., Szegedi, Gyula,
& Zeher, Margit. (2015). Similarities and differences between pediatric and
adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus, 24(8),
796�803.
Yilmaz, Neslihan, Emmungil, Hakan,
Gucenmez, Sercan, Ozen, Gulsen, Yildiz, Fatih, Balkarli, Ayşe, Kimyon,
Gezmis, Coskun, Belkis Nihan, Dogan, Ismail, & Pamuk, Omer Nuri. (2015).
Incidence of cyclophosphamide-induced urotoxicity and protective effect of
mesna in rheumatic diseases. The Journal of Rheumatology, 42(9),
1661�1666.
Yu, Cong, Gershwin, M. Eric, & Chang,
Christopher. (2014). Diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus: a
critical review. Journal of Autoimmunity, 48, 10�13.
Chatarina Widianti, Yulistiani, Ninik Asmaningsih Soemyarso (2023) |
First publication right: Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia |
This article is licensed under: |