Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah
Indonesia p�ISSN: 2541-0849 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol. 7, No. 10, Oktober 2022
VISUAL PERCEPTION OF THE HERITAGE BUILDING FACADES IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE
CENTER AREA OF MALANG CITY
Faisal Bahar1*,
Herry Santosa, Jenny Ernawati
Faculty of Engineering, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
The Administrative Center Area of Malang city, which is located around
the tugu square, is one area that plays an important
role in the development of the eastern part of Malang City, which has many
historic buildings from the Dutch colonial heritage. The purpose of this study
is to find out the similarities and differences in perceptions between the
public and practitioners and academics in the field of architecture in
assessing the visual elements on the historic building facades and to find out
which facade visual elements are significant according to the public,
practitioners, and academics in the field of architecture on the visual quality
of the historic building facades in the Administrative Center Area of Malang
city. Developments and constructions in the Administrative Center Area of
Malang city, which do not pay attention to the area context as a historic area,
can slowly cause a shift in the shape and meaning of the city structure which
can affect the visual character of the building facades in the area. The shift
in the visual character of the building facades that do not pay attention to
the area context in a historic area can harm environmental aesthetics, causing
a decrease in the visual quality of the historic area. This study uses
quantitative research methods with a public perception approach. To measure
people's perceptions, a differential semantic scale is used which contains two
opposite words. The results show that the assessment between two groups of
respondents with different occupational and educational backgrounds has the
similar assessment results on each facade element. Facade elements that are
significant to the visual quality of the historic building facades in the
Administrative Center Area of Malang City are the facade shape and color.
Keywords: visual perception; facades; heritage buildings; quantitative method
Introduction
The
Administrative Center Area of Malang City, which is located around Tugu Square,
is a historic area that has influenced the Malang City development which is
oriented towards the east from Jalan Kayutangan in the Dutch East Indies era.
This area has many historic buildings from the Dutch colonial heritage which
are currently Malang City landmarks such as the Malang City Hall building.
During the Dutch
East Indies era, the area around Bunder Square was a major part of the second
phase of Malang City's development and construction plan (Bouwplan II). In
Bouwplan II, it was decided to build a new center of city government, namely
the Jan Pieter Zoen Coen Plein area (abbreviated: J.P Coen Plein) which is now
known as Bunder Square because its core is an open field in the form of a
circle, which in Javanese is called bunder. This decision was taken after a new
generation of Dutch people who came after 1900 were dissatisfied with the
previous Merdeka Square which was considered too indigenous. They wanted to
give the impression that the city had a western-style and wanted the center of
the city's government to move from the Merdeka Square. Around Bunder Square,
various official and monumental buildings were constructed, such as the Malang
City Hall Building, the HBS/AMS School (now State Senior High School 1 Malang),
as well as the residences of the military commanders, and so on.
Reveals that the
existence of historic buildings with distinctive colonial architecture can
provide qualities that can attract people's attention to an area (Dafrina,
Muhammad, Andriani, & Fitri, 2022). Architecture is the main visual
element that forms the basis of urban imagery so that the design activities
produced by a city are the most tangible form visually and then can present its
era so that the existence of an area cannot be separated from the existence of history
and the surrounding buildings.
Developments and
constructions around the Administrative Center Area of Malang city that do not
pay attention to the area context as a historic area can slowly cause changes
and shifts in the shape and meaning of the area structure which can affect the
visual character of the building facades around the area. The shift in the
visual character of the building facades that does not pay attention to the
area context in a historic area can harm environmental aesthetics, causing a
decrease in the visual quality of the historic area. According to (Subadyo, 2009), the pattern of
landscape distribution of the road corridor in the Tugu-Balaikota area (the
administrative center of Malang City) has a relatively decreasing beauty with
increasing distance from the City Hall office or the Bunder Square (Tugu).
The
Administrative Center Area of Malang City should maintain its visual quality
and characteristics so that it can improve its image as a historic area. Visual
quality is an assessment that arises from the perception, and feelings of
humans when they see something or are related to the visual senses (Azis, Santosa, & Ernawati, 2019). (Siswanto & Setiawan, 2015) in their
research explain that visual perception is the human ability to interpret,
analyze and give meaning to what is seen by the eye. The perception function is
to recognize or recognize what objects exist and localize or determine where
the object is (van Eymeren, 2014). Purwodarminto
in (Anandaju, 2019) says that
perception is a direct response of an absorption or human process to know
certain things through sensing. Through visual perception, a person can
understand the environment around him through the sense of sight.
Visual image
assessment of a historic area is determined by the visual elements of the building
facade (Junianingrum, Wijaya, & Setyono, 2021). The rows of
historic building facades around the Administrative Center Area of Malang City
should be able to improve the image of the area. It is also stated by (Junianingrum et al., 2021) that the
architectural style and the shape of the building facade can play a role in
shaping the visual quality of the facade, especially in historic areas. The
facade determines the visual strength of the building and is usually judged by
the community by looking at the facade (Suri & Sugiri, 2015). A facade is a
representation or expression of various aspects that appear and can be observed
visually (Tarore & Kaunang, 2016). According to (Sahmura & Wahyuningrum, 2018), the facade is
the most important architectural element capable of voicing the function and
meaning of a building. The root of the word facade is taken from the Latin word
facies which is a synonym for face and appearance. Therefore, the facade is the
face of a building facing the street.
In 2018 the
Malang City government has designated 32 (thirty-two) historic buildings as
Cultural Conservation, 2 (two) of which are located in the Administrative
Center Area of Malang City, namely, Malang City Hall and State Senior High
School 1 Malang Buildings. Thus it is very important to know the most
influential visual elements in creating the visual quality of the historic
building facades in the Administrative Center Area of Malang City so that they
can be a reference for practitioners, academics, and the government to plan
steps for preserving historic buildings on facade elements, and development in
the study area by paying attention to the visual elements of the facade that
can support and strengthen the characteristics of the area so that the development
and preservation of the study site can still pay attention to visual comfort
and improve the characteristics of the area as a historic area.
This study aims
to determine the similarities and differences in perceptions between community
groups and groups of practitioners and academics in the field of architecture
in assessing the visual elements on the facades of cultural heritage buildings,
as well as knowing the most influential facade visual elements according to the
community, practitioners, and academics on the visual quality of the facades of
cultural heritage buildings in the Administrative Center Area of Malang city.
Method
This�study uses quantitative methods by
distributing questionnaires via google form to determine the assessment of the
public, practitioners, and academics in the field of architecture about the
role of each visual element of the facade in shaping the visual quality of the
facade of cultural heritage buildings in the Administrative Center
Area of Malang City. The research location is in the
Administrative Center of Malang city, which is around
the tugu square.
Figure 1. Location Map
The basis for the selection of cultural heritage
buildings that are used as research objects at the study location is based on
Malang City Regulation No. 1 of 2018 concerning cultural heritage. Based on the
local regulation, there are 2 cultural heritage buildings in the study area
that are the object of research, namely the Malang City Hall and State Senior
High School 1 Malang Buildings.
In this study, the population is Malang City people
and people outside Malang City who have lived in Malang City for at least 4
years. The sampling method (respondents) is non-probability with the purposive
judgment sampling technique. The groups of respondents from the entire
population are as follows:
1.
The
general public of Malang City and the general public outside Malang City who
has lived in Malang City for at least 4 years. The criteria for respondents in
this general public group are people with a minimum age of 18 years and
physically and mentally healthy so that they can give a good assessment. This
group consists of 90 people. The consideration�in selecting
this sample is that the general public is the user of the area in the study
location, so they are considered to be able to provide an assessment based on
their experience when they are in the study location.
2.
The community from
practitioners and academics in the field of architecture with the number�of samples selected as many as 90 people.
Respondents from this group were divided into 3 categories, namely 30 architect
practitioners, 30 architecture lecturers, and 30 architecture students in the
sixth semester and above. The determination of the number of sub-samples is
based on considerations from Roscoe's theory (Sekaran & Bougie, 2016)�which says that if a sample is to be
broken down into several sub-samples, the minimum number of sub-samples is 30.
Another consideration is that practitioners and academics in the field of
architecture can assess the visual quality of building facades based on aesthetic
principles and rules.
According to
previous research, the visual elements that make up the facade consist of
architectural style (Fauziah, Antariksa, & Ernawati, 2012), (Utaberta, Jalali, Johar, Surat, & Che-Ani, 2012), (Santosa, Ikaruga, & Kobayashi, 2013), the shape of the fa�ade (Fauziah et al., 2012), (Utaberta et al., 2012), doors (Kiruthiga & Thirumaran, 2017), window (Kiruthiga & Thirumaran, 2017)�and (Fauziah et al., 2012), material (Santosa et al., 2013), texture (Fauziah et al., 2012), color (Fauziah et al., 2012), and (Utaberta et al., 2012). The visual elements that make up the facade are
used as an observation variable (the independent variable) to assess the visual
quality (the dependent variable) of the cultural heritage building's facade.
Each group of respondents
was asked to assess a scale of 1 to 7 in each variable observed with a Semantic
Differential Scale with the opposite word as in table 1.
Table 1. Research variable assessment scale
No. |
Variabel |
Semantic differential
scale |
|||||||
Very Poor |
Poor |
Somewhat poor |
Fair |
Somewhat beautiful |
Beautiful |
Very beautiful |
|||
1 |
Architectural Style |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
2 |
Facade Shape |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
3 |
Door |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
4 |
Window |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
5 |
Material |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
6 |
Texture |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
7 |
Color |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
The analysis method used an independent sample t-test
to determine the differences and similarities between the two groups of
respondents, as well as multiple linear regression analysis to determine the
most influential visual elements on the visual quality of cultural heritage
buildings in the Administrative Center Area of
Malang City. Determination of the visual quality category of
facade elements was adopted from the research of (Ramli & Santosa,
2020)�which can be
seen in table 2.
Table 2. Visual quality category
Scale |
Category |
1.00 � 1.85 |
Very poor |
1.86 � 2.71 |
Poor |
2.72 � 3.57 |
Somewhat poor |
3.58 � 4.43 |
Fair |
4.44 � 5.29 |
Somewhat beautiful |
5.30 � 6.15 |
Beautiful |
6.16 � 7.00 |
Very beautiful |
Results and Discussion��
The number of respondents is 180 people,
consisting of 90 general public, 30 architect
practitioners, 30 architecture lecturers, and 30 final year architecture
students. Respondents with male sex as many as 104 people or 57.8%, while with
female sex 76 people or 42.2%. Respondents who live in Malang city are as many
as 108 people or 60%, while those who live outside the city of Malang are as
many as 72 people or 40%. The respondent profile can be seen in table 3.
Table 3. Respondent Profile
Respondent Group |
Sex |
Domicile |
Education |
Total |
% |
||||||
Male |
Female |
Malang City |
Outside of Malang City |
Senior High School |
Diploma |
S1 |
S2 |
S3 |
|||
General Public |
59 |
31 |
58 |
32 |
9 |
0 |
60 |
11 |
9 |
90 |
50 |
Architect Practitioner |
16 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
14 |
1 |
30 |
16.67 |
Architectural Lecturer |
16 |
14 |
22 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
14 |
30 |
16.67 |
Architectural Student |
13 |
17 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
3 |
0 |
30 |
16.67 |
Total |
104 |
76 |
108 |
72 |
9 |
1 |
103 |
42 |
24 |
180 |
100 |
% |
57.8 |
42.2 |
60.0 |
40.0 |
5.0 |
0.6 |
57.2 |
23.3 |
13.3 |
From table 4 it can be concluded that the data
obtained have a high-reliability value, with the Cronbach Alpha value of 0.939
> 0.600f
Table 4. Reliability Test Results
No |
Variable |
Cronbach Alpha |
Value Limit |
Remark |
1 |
Beauty |
0.939 |
0.600 |
Reliable |
1.
Visual Quality
Assessment of the Malang City Hall Building Fa�ade
Malang City Hall building is one of the heritage
buildings of the Dutch colonial government. This building is
located in the circle of Jalan Tugu Malang
City with a Dutch colonial architectural style. The idea of
designing the City Hall construction emerged in 1926. At that
time, H. I. Bussemaker held a competition for the
design of Malang City Hall and appointed Ir. W. Lemei
as a judge assisted by Ir. Ph.N.te Winkel and Ir. A.
Grunberg. On 14 February 1927, it was decided by the House of Representatives (gemeenteraad) so that the best design could be realized
with various changes proposed by the jury, and the decision fell to HF Horn
from Semarang with the slogan Voor de Burgers van Malang (for the people of
Malang). This building was built in 1927 and completed in September 1929, and
then on� 12
December, 2018 Malang City Hall Building was designated as a cultural heritage
building.
Malang City Hall building is a two-story
building with the shape of the letter �M� when viewed from a height. The architectural
style of this building is a combination of De Stijl and Nieuwe
Bouwen. The main building consists of a lobby on the first floor and is
equipped with several service rooms located on the right and left wings of the
building. The window model that looks from the front is in the form of a
shingle with two fighting butterfly styles in each window. The shape of this
window model is because Malang City has a sub-tropical climate with high
rainfall. On the second floor of the building, there is a multipurpose room
which is currently called the City Hall Meeting Room, as well as a second-floor
balcony. In the original design, the City Hall balcony did not have a special
roof, but in the late 1980s, a roof was added to protect the balcony from rain
and hot sun. On 20 May 1953, in conjunction with the inauguration of the
National Monument, President Ir. Sukarno once used this balcony as a stage to
deliver his speech at the beginning of independence.
Figure 2. Malang City Hall Building
Table 5. The average respondent's assessment of
the beauty of the facade elements of the Malang City Hall building
No |
Variable |
General public |
Practitioners and
Academics |
Independent Samples t-test |
Graph |
||||||||
Mean |
Visual Quality |
Mean |
Visual Quality |
Sig. (2tailed) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
||
1 |
Architectural Style |
6.222** |
Very Beautiful |
6.067** |
Beautiful |
0.294 |
|
||||||
2 |
Facade Shape |
6.144 |
Beautiful |
5.978 |
Beautiful |
0.292 |
|||||||
3 |
Door |
5.644 |
Beautiful |
5.367* |
Beautiful |
0.182 |
|||||||
4 |
Window |
5.600* |
Beautiful |
5.444 |
Beautiful |
0.472 |
|||||||
5 |
Material |
5.644 |
Beautiful |
5.589 |
Beautiful |
0.779 |
|||||||
6 |
Texture |
5.633 |
Beautiful |
5.600 |
Beautiful |
0.862 |
|||||||
7 |
Color |
5.800 |
Beautiful |
5.667 |
Beautiful |
0.471 |
|||||||
8 |
Visual Quality |
6.067 |
Beautiful |
5.789 |
Beautiful |
0.082 |
|||||||
x < 4 = Penilaian Negatif |
* = Nilai Terendah |
*** = Memiliki Perbedaan
Penilaian |
|
||||||||||
x ≥ 4 = Penilaian Positif |
** = Nilai Tertinggi |
|
|
The general
public considers the architectural style to have the highest visual
quality as a facade element with an average value of 6.222 while windows have a
low visual quality on the facade of the Malang City Hall building with an
average value of 5.600. In general, the public considers that the facade of the
Malang City Hall building has a visual quality on a beautiful scale with an
average value of 6.067.
The respondent group of
practitioners and academics also assessed that architectural style had the
highest visual quality as a facade element with an average value of 6.067,
while the door on the facade of the Malang City Hall building had a low visual
quality value with an average value of 5.367. The assessment of practitioners
and academics on the visual quality of the Malang City Hall building facade as a whole is on a beautiful scale with an average value of
5.789.
Based on
the results of the Independent sample t-test analysis in table 5, it can be
seen that the assessment between the general public and practitioners and
academics is the similar for all dependent variables (Architectural Style,
Facade Shapes, Doors, Windows, Materials, Textures, and Colors)
as well as on independent variables ( Visual Quality), this refers to the
p-value value (t-test significance) greater than (α=0.05), which means
that there is no difference in assessment between the general public as well as
practitioners and academics in assessing the facade elements of the Malang City
Hall building.�
The
following is a matrix table of respondents' assessment of the facade elements
on the visual quality of the Malang City Hall building facade based on an
independent sample t-test analysis.
Table 6.�Respondents' assessment of the beauty of the
facade elements in the Malang City Hall building
No. |
Variable |
Respondent assessment |
Assessment Comparison |
|
General Public |
Professional and Academics |
|||
1 |
Architectural Style |
Very Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
2 |
Facade Shape |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
3 |
Door |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
4 |
Window |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
5 |
Material |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
6 |
Texture |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
7 |
Color |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
8 |
Visual Quality |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
Based on the data in table 6, all the observed
variables have a similar assessment by the two groups of respondents. In the
Malang City Hall building, the average assessment between the two groups of
respondents is on the "Beautiful" scale.
To find out which facade elements are
significant according to the community, practitioners
and academics on the visual quality of the Malang City Hall building facade, a
multiple regression analysis was conducted. Based on the analysis of the F test
(simultaneous test) and t-test (partial test) on the Malang City Hall building
data, a regression model was obtained which showed a significant influence of
several variable components on the visual quality of the Malang City Hall
building facade as follows (table 7)
Table 7. Linear Regression Test Results on the
Beauty of the Visual Quality of the Malang City Hall Building Facade
Coefficientsa |
|||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. t |
|
(Constant) |
.413 |
.251 |
|
1.649 |
.101 |
Architectural
Style |
.319 |
.080 |
.295 |
3.978 |
.000*** |
Facade
Shape |
.216 |
.076 |
.213 |
2.861 |
.005*** |
Door |
.016 |
.051 |
.020 |
.308 |
.759 |
Window |
.117 |
.059 |
.158 |
1.978 |
.050** |
Material |
-.094 |
.074 |
-.116 |
-1.276 |
.204 |
Texture |
.144 |
.073 |
.172 |
1.980 |
.049** |
Color |
.214 |
.061 |
.247 |
3.511 |
.001*** |
a. Dependent Variable: Visual Quality of Building Facade |
|||||
F-calculated = 83.206 Sig. F = 0.000*** R-Square = 0.772 |
Testing the partial effect of building facade
elements on the visual quality of the building facade as a
whole shows that architectural style, facade shape, texture, and color have a significant influence on respondents'
assessment of the Malang City Hall building. This is indicated by the
significance value t<0.05 on the architectural
style variable with a significance value (.000**), the facade shape variable
with a significance value (.005**), the texture variable with a significance
value (.049**), and color variable with a
significance value (.001***).
Based on the results of the regression analysis
on the Malang City Hall building, an R-square value of 0.772 was obtained. This
shows that the visual quality of the facade of the Malang City Hall building
can only be explained by 77.2% by architectural style, facade shape, door
shape, window shape, material type, texture type, and color
type. So that there are still 22.8% of other factors that are not included in
this study that can affect the visual quality of the Malang City Hall building
facade.
2.
Visual Quality
Assessment of the Building Facade of State Senior High School 1 Malang
The building of State Senior High School 1
Malang or Tugu High School is a Dutch heritage school
in Indonesia. This school was founded in 1931 in the Alun-alun
Bunder (Tugu Square) which is a school complex
consisting of State Senior High School 1, State Senior High School 3, and State
Senior High School 4�
Malang. This building was designed by Ir. W. Lemei
from landsgebouwendienst (State building office) East
Java.
Figure 4. Building of State Senior High School 1
Malang
According to history, the current building of
State Senior High School 1 Malang is a new building that was built during the
post-independence Dutch colonial period. The architectural style of the school,
which was inaugurated in 1950, is a mixture of colonial architectural styles
and modern architecture. This can be seen from the finishing of details and
decorations that are not like in 19th-century architecture.
Based on the respondents' assessment of the
State Senior High School 1 Malang building, the average value was obtained as follows
(table 8).
Table 8. The average respondent's assessment of
the beauty of the facade elements of State Senior High School 1 Malang
No |
Variable |
General public |
Practitioners and
Academics |
Independent Samples t-test |
Graph |
|||||||||
Mean |
Visual Quality |
Mean |
Visual Quality |
Sig. (2tailed) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
||
1 |
Architectural Style |
5.744** |
Beautiful |
5.444** |
Beautiful |
0.063 |
|
|||||||
2 |
Facade Shape |
5.656 |
Beautiful |
5.344 |
Beautiful |
0.073 |
||||||||
3 |
Door |
4.600* |
Somewhat Beautiful |
4.178* |
Fair |
0.079 |
||||||||
4 |
Window |
5.478 |
Beautiful |
5.178 |
Somewhat Beautiful |
0.160 |
||||||||
5 |
Material |
5.633 |
Beautiful |
5.311 |
Beautiful |
0.104 |
||||||||
6 |
Texture |
5.633 |
Beautiful |
5.356 |
Beautiful |
0.137 |
||||||||
7 |
Color |
5.589 |
Beautiful |
5.311 |
Beautiful |
0.130 |
||||||||
8 |
Visual Quality |
5.689 |
Beautiful |
5.444 |
Beautiful |
0.147 |
||||||||
x < 4 = Penilaian Negatif |
* = Nilai Terendah |
*** = Memiliki Perbedaan
Penilaian |
|
|||||||||||
x ≥ 4 = Penilaian Positif |
** = Nilai Tertinggi |
|
|
Based on table 8, the general public assesses that
architectural style has the highest visual quality as a facade element with an
average value of 5.744, while doors have a low visual quality on the facade of
State Senior High School 1 Malang with an average value of 4,600. In general,
the public considers that the facade of the State Senior High School 1 Malang
building has a visual quality on a beautiful scale with an average value of
5.689.�
The respondent group of practitioners and
academics also assessed that architectural style has the highest visual quality
as a facade element with an average value of 5.444, while the door on the
facade of the State Senior High School 1 Malang building has a low visual
quality value with an average value of 4.178. The assessment of practitioners
and academics on the facade visual quality of the State Senior High School 1
Malang building as a whole is on the
"beautiful" scale with an average value of 5.444.
Based on the results of the Independent sample
t-test analysis in table 8, it can be seen that the assessment between the
general public and practitioners and academics is the similar for all dependent
variables (Architectural Style, Facade Shapes, Doors, Windows, Materials, Textures,
and Colors) as well as on the independent variables (Visual
Quality), this refers to the p-value value (t-test significance) greater than
(α=0.05), which means that there is no difference in assessment between the
general public as well as practitioners and academics in assessing the facade
elements of State Senior High School 1 Malang building.
The following is a matrix table of respondents'
assessment results about the role of facade elements on the visual quality of
the facade of State Senior High School 1 Malang based on an independent sample
t-test analysis.
Table 9.�Respondents' assessment of the beauty of the
facade elements in the State Senior High School 1 Malang building
No. |
Facade Elements |
Respondent assessment |
Assessment comparison |
|
General public |
Professional and
academics |
|||
1 |
Architectural Style |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
2 |
Facade Shape |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
3 |
Door |
Somewhat Beautiful |
Fair |
Similar |
4 |
Window |
Beautiful |
Somewhat Beautiful |
Similar |
5 |
Material |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
6 |
Texture |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
7 |
Color |
Beautiful |
Beautiful |
Similar |
Based on the data in table 9, all the observed
variables have the similar assessment by the two groups of respondents. In the
State Senior High School 1 Malang building, the average assessment between the
two groups of respondents is on the "fair"
to "beautiful" scale.
To find out which facade elements are
significant according to the community, practitioners, and academics in shaping
the visual quality of the facade of State Senior High School 1 Malang, a
multiple regression analysis was conducted. Based on the analysis of the F test
(simultaneous test) and t-test (partial test) on the building data of State
Senior High School 1 Malang, a regression model was obtained which showed a
significant effect of several variable components on the visual quality of the
facade of the State Senior High School 1 Malang building as follows (table 10).
Table 10.�
Linear Regression Test Results on the Beauty of the Visual Quality of
the Building Facade of State Senior High School 1 Malang
Coefficientsa |
|||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. t |
|
(Constant) |
.476 |
.253 |
|
1.880 |
.062 |
Architectural Style |
.152 |
.081 |
.145 |
1.885 |
.061** |
Facade
Shape |
.286 |
.069 |
.295 |
4.143 |
.000*** |
Door |
.018 |
.034 |
.026 |
.534 |
.594 |
Window |
.138 |
.059 |
.174 |
2.335 |
.021** |
Material |
.010 |
.068 |
.012 |
.150 |
.881 |
Texture |
.075 |
.071 |
.083 |
1.050 |
.295 |
Color |
.255 |
.051 |
.278 |
4.971 |
.000*** |
a. Dependent Variable: Visual Quality of
Building Facade |
|||||
F-calculated = 68.586 Sig. F = 0.000*** R-Square = 0.736 |
Testing the partial effect of building facade elements on the visual
quality of the building facade as a whole shows that
the shape of the facade, windows, and color have a significant
influence on respondents' assessment of the State Senior High School 1 Malang
building. This is indicated by the significance value t<0.05
on the facade shape variable with a significance value (.000**), the window
variable with a significance value (.021**), and the color
variable with a significance value (.000***).
Based on the results of the regression analysis on the State Senior High
School 1 Malang building, the R-square value of 0.736 was obtained. This shows
that the visual quality of the facade of State Senior High School 1 Malang can
only be explained by 73.6% by architectural style, facade shape, door shape,
window shape, material type, texture type, and color
type. So that there are still 26.4% of other factors that are not included in
this study that can affect the visual quality of the facade of the State Senior
High School 1 Malang building.
From the results of the discussion on the two research objects, it was
found that the assessment between the public, practitioners, and academics in
the field of architecture is similar regarding the role of each facade element
on the visual quality of the building facade of Malang City Hall and State
Senior High School 1 Malang. The Malang City Hall building is a landmark around
the area, while State Senior High School 1 Malang is an educational building so
people know the building well. The group of practitioners and academics gave an
assessment based on consideration of the historic aspects of the building and
the area, as well as the principles of design and aesthetics, as well as based
on the experience of space in everyday life at the study location. Community
assessments with practitioners and academics assessment with different
occupational and educational backgrounds have the similar assessment results in
Malang City Hall and State Senior High School 1 Malang buildings, so it can be
concluded that each facade element has a role with the similar level of beauty
according to the community, practitioners and
academics.
From the discussion results on the facade elements that are significant
according to the public, practitioners, and academics in the field of
architecture on the visual quality of the historic building facades, it is
found that the elements of architectural style, facade shape, texture, and color have a significant influence on the visual quality of
the facade of the Malang City Hall building. State Senior High School 1 Malang
facade shape, window, and color give a significant
influence on the visual quality of the facade of State Senior High School 1
Malang.
In general, the facade elements that affect the visual quality of the
historic building facades in the Administrative Center
Area of Malang City are the facade shape and color.
This is in line with what was said by (Dipta, 2015)�who
explains that the facade can describe the face of the building where the function
and meaning of the building can be expressed. The facade determines the visual
strength of the building and is usually judged by the community by assessing
the facade (Suri & Sugiri,
2015). The facade is an element that has a very
significant impact on the beauty of the Colonial building (Ramli & Santosa,
2020).
(Hu, Heath, Tang, & Zhang, 2017)�in their research entitled Influence
of Building Facade Visual Elements on Its Historic Image: Case of Kuala Lumpur
City, Malaysia explained that color is the most
influential element on the facade of historic buildings. While white and gray are the most suitable colors
for historic buildings, this can also improve the quality of road corridors. (Majidah, Hasfera, & Fadli, 2019)�argues that color
has a much deeper and broader meaning than the concept of just a layer of paint
on a surface or a decoration tool. Color is the basic
(main) element of a design and the most expressive, which is believed to be the
most important visual experience that serves as a powerful channel of
information for the human cognitive system and plays an important role in
improving memory performance.
Conclusion
Based on the
results of the analysis and discussion, it can be concluded that the assessment
of the general public with the assessment of practitioners and academics in the
field of architecture with different occupational and educational backgrounds
has the similar assessment results in Malang City Hall and State Senior High
School 1 Malang buildings, so it can be concluded that each facade elements
have a role with the similar level of beauty according to the community,
practitioners and academics.
The visual
elements of the facade that most influence the visual quality of the facade of
the Malang City Hall building according to the community, practitioners and
academics are architectural styles, facade shape, texture, and color.
Meanwhile, the facade visual elements that most influence the visual quality of
the building facade of State Senior High School 1 Malang according to the
community, practitioners, and academics are the shape of the facade, windows,
and color.
Anandaju, Phebe Petrina. (2019).
Kajian Persepsi Visual Pada Elemen Sekuens di Museum Kereta Api Ambarawa. EDimensi
Arsitektur Petra, 7(1), 585�592.
Azis,
Baskoro, Santosa, Herry, & Ernawati, Jenny. (2019). Penilaian Persepsi
Masyarakat Terhadap Bangunan Besejarah Di Koridor Kayutangan, Malang,
Indonesia. Local Wisdom: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Kearifan Lokal, 11(1),
1�15.
Dafrina,
Armelia, Muhammad, Muhammad, Andriani, Dela, & Fitri, Riza. (2022).
Identifikasi Bangunan Kolonial pada Hunian di Kecamatan Banda Sakti Kota
Lhokseumawe sebagai Aset Heritage. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 7(2).
Dipta,
Andreas Arka Paratma. (2015). Karakteristik Ruang Koridor Jalan Panggung
Pecinan Kembang Jepun Surabaya Sebagai Koridor Wisata Urban Heritage. UAJY.
Fauziah,
Nur, Antariksa, Antariksa, & Ernawati, Jenny. (2012). Kualitas Visual
Fasade Bangunan Modern Pasca Kolonial di Jalan Kayutangan Malang. RUAS
(Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies), 10(2), 11�18.
Hu, Yun,
Heath, Tim, Tang, Yue, & Zhang, Qi. (2017). Using quantitative analysis to
assess the appropriateness of infill buildings in historic settings. Journal
of Architectural and Planning Research, 91�113.
Junianingrum,
Dewi, Wijaya, I. Nyoman Suluh, & Setyono, Deni Agus. (2021). Kualitas
Visual Elemen Citra Kawasan Kayutangan di Kota Malang. Planning for Urban
Region and Environment Journal (PURE), 10(4), 169�180.
Kiruthiga,
Kandasamy, & Thirumaran, Kesavaperumal. (2017). Visual perception on the
architectural elements of the built heritage of a historic temple town: A case
study of Kumbakonam, India. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(1),
96�107.
Majidah,
Majidah, Hasfera, Dian, & Fadli, M. Fadli M. (2019). Penggunaan Warna dalam
Disain Interior Perpustakaan Terhadap Psikologis Pemustaka. Ristekdik:
Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 4(2), 95�106.
Ramli,
Syamsun, & Santosa, Herry. (2020). Penilaian kualitas estetika elemen
arsitektural bangunan Kolonial di Jalan Basuki Rahmat, Malang. ARTEKS:
Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, 5(1), 93�106.
Sahmura,
Yemima, & Wahyuningrum, Sri Hartuti. (2018). Identifikasi Langgam dan
Periodisasi Arsitektur Kolonial Nusantara Pada Bangunan Cagar Budaya. MODUL,
18(2), 60�69.
Santosa,
Herry, Ikaruga, Shinji, & Kobayashi, Takeshi. (2013). Visual Evaluation of
Urban Commercial Streetscape Through Building Owners Judgment. Journal of
Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), 78(691), 1995�2005.
Sekaran,
Uma, & Bougie, Roger. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill
Building Approach (7th ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Siswanto,
Cynthia, & Setiawan, Andereas Pandu. (2015). Persepsi VisualPengunjung
terhadap Elemen Interior Stilrod Caf� di Surabaya. Intra, 3(2),
143�150.
Subadyo, A.
Tutut. (2009). Penilaian estetika visual lansekap koridor jalan dikawasan civic
center tugu alun alun bunder Kota Malang. Jurnal Tesa Arsitektur Journal of
Architectural Discourse, 7(1), 16�25.
Suri, Nur
Sukma, & Sugiri, Agung. (2015). Persepsi dan Preferensi Masyarakat Terhadap
Fasad Bangunan di Koridor Jalan Ki Samaun Kota Tangerang. Tataloka, 17(3),
147�160.
Tarore,
Larry T., & Kaunang, Ivan R. B. (2016). Karakteristik Tipologi
Arsitektur Kolonial Belanda Pada Rumah Tinggal Di Kawasan Tikala. Sam
Ratulangi University.
Utaberta,
N., Jalali, A., Johar, S., Surat, M., & Che-Ani, A. I. (2012). Building
facade study in Lahijan city, Iran: The impact of facade�s visual elements on
historical image. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,
6(7), 1839�1844.
van
Eymeren, Margaretha Margawati. (2014). Memahami Persepsi Visual: Sumbangan
Psikologi Kognitif Dalam Seni Dan Desain. Ultimart: Jurnal Komunikasi Visual,
7(2), 47�63.
Copyright holder: Faisal Bahar, Herry Santosa,
Jenny Ernawati (2022) |
First publication right: Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah
Indonesia |
This article is licensed under: |