Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti Atas Akta yang Dibuatnya Karena Adanya Tuntutan Pihak Ketiga dalam Hal Notaris yang Diganti Meninggal Dunia Sebelum Cuti Berakhir
Abstract
As is known in articl 35 UUJN when the notary dead at the time of running the holiday, the task of notary Office is executed by a substitute notary as a provisional official Notary 30 (thirty) days since the date of notary death. The problem in this research is how is the responsibility of the notary of the deed made because there is a third party submission in the evento that the notary is reimbursedo before the end of leave? And how are the legal efforts of a substitute for the deed he made because there is a third party claim in the event that the notary was changed before the end of leave? The research uses normative juridical methods that are supported by juridically empirical. The data used is a secondary data consisting of primary legal material, secondary legal material and a tertier legal material. Besides, it also used primary data as a supporter of secondary data legal material. The theory of the responsibility of Hans Kelsen and the legal protection theory of Phillipus M. Hadjon is used. The responsibility of the notary public on the deed made because there is a third party guidance in the case of the notarized changed before the expiration of the leave is a permanent substitute responsibility until the death because it has changed its legal status to the provisional Office notary, for that the substitute notary has the same responsibilities. In the event that a replacement notary is proven to commit negligence, a surrogate notary has a civil liability that is to compensate the third party, the responsibility of the notary Public administration receives an oral rebuke, written reprimand, disrespectful termination, and criminal liability in a substitute subject to criminal penalties. A substitute legal remedy for the deed he made because of a third party claim in the event that the notary was changed before the end of leave, i.e. a substitute is entitled to make a repressive law attempt, because the legal status of the substitute was switched to as a notary provisional office.
Downloads
References
Adjie, Habib. (2007). Hukum Notariat Indonesia, Tafsir Tematik Terhadap Uu No.30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama. Google Scholar
Adjie, Habib. (2012). Bernas-Bernas Pemikiran di Bidang Notaris dan PPAT. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju. Google Scholar
Andhika, A. R. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Perkara Pidana Berkaitan dengan Akta yang Dibuatnya Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004. Premise Law Journal, 1, 14144. Google Scholar
Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia, Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. Yogyakarta: UII-Press. Google Scholar
Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press. Google Scholar
Budiono, Herlien. (2013). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan Buku Kedua. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Darus, M. Luthfan Hadi. (2017). Hukum Notariat Dan Tanggungjawab Jabatan Notaris. Yogyakarta: Uii Press. Google Scholar
Eko, P. P. (2019). Kedudukan Dan Tanggungjawab Notaris Penerima Protokol Atas Notaris Yang Meninggal Dunia. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Andalas). Google Scholar
H.R, Ridwan. (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hadjon, Philipus M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu. Google Scholar
K. Lubis, Suhrawadi. (1994). Etika Profesi Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kelsen, Hans. (2007). Sebagaimana diterjemahkan oleh Somardi, General Theory Of law and State, Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif Empirik. Jakarta: BEE Media Indonesia.
Lubis, Suhrawadi K. (1994). Etika Profesi Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Nico. (2003). Tanggungjawab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum. Yogyakarta: Center for Documentation and Studies of Bussines Law. Google Scholar
Notodisoerjo, R. Soegondo. (1993). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo. Google Scholar
Nurbani, Salim dan Erlis Septiana. (2014). Penelitian Teori Hukum pada Disrtasi dan Tesis (Buku Kedua). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. (1982). Pengantar Filsafat Hukum, diterjemahkan dari edisi yang diperluas oleh Drs. Mohammad Radjab. Jakarta: Bhratara Karya Aksara. Google Scholar
Putri, AR. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris. Jakarta: Sofmedia.
Putri, K. P. (2017). Tanggung Jawab Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Purna Bakti Terhadap Akta Yang Pernah Dibuat (Analisis Pasal 65 dan Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris). Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum. Google Scholar
Sumaryono, Q. R. (2017). Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan MenuruT UU NO. 2 Tahun 2014 JO. UU NO. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Lex Privatum, 5(9). Google Scholar
Thamrin, Husni. (2011). Pembuatan Akta Pertanahan oleh Notaris. Yogyakarta: Pressindo. Google Scholar
Copyright (c) 2021 Ade Rinanti, Ariawan Ariawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
