Robotic Assisted Surgery di Jabodetabek: Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Masyarakat

  • Lilian Megasari Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana
  • Hery Winoto Tj Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana
Keywords: Robotic Assisted Surgery, Technology Acceptance, UTAUT, Perceived Risk, Social Influence

Abstract

Penerapan teknologi medis canggih seperti Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS) di Indonesia masih menghadapi tantangan, terutama terkait rendahnya tingkat adopsi meskipun infrastruktur teknologi telah tersedia. Kesenjangan ini diduga dipengaruhi oleh faktor psikologis, teknis, dan sosial yang membentuk persepsi serta keputusan masyarakat dalam menerima inovasi bedah robotik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganal menganalisis determinan penerimaan teknologi RAS dengan menguji pengaruh Effort Expectancy, Performance Expectancy, Perceived Risk, dan Social Influence terhadap minat adopsi masyarakat. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif eksplanatori dengan pengumpulan data melalui kuesioner terhadap 139 responden dewasa di wilayah Jabodetabek. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling berbasis Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model mampu menjelaskan 63,1% varians minat penerimaan. Performance Expectancy dan Social Influence berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap minat adopsi, sementara Perceived Risk berpengaruh negatif signifikan dan menjadi faktor penghambat dominan, terutama terkait kekhawatiran biaya dan keamanan prosedur. Sebaliknya, Effort Expectancy tidak menunjukkan pengaruh signifikan. Keterbaruan penelitian ini terletak pada pengembangan model UTAUT melalui integrasi variabel risiko persepsian dalam konteks negara berkembang. Implikasi praktis menekankan pentingnya transparansi biaya, komunikasi berbasis bukti keamanan, serta optimalisasi peran tenaga medis dalam meningkatkan kepercayaan publik.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cresswell, K., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Sheikh, A. (2018). Health care robotics: Qualitative exploration of key challenges and future directions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(7), e10410. https://doi.org/10.2196/10410

Fiske, A., Henningsen, P., & Buyx, A. (2019). Your robot therapist will see you now: Ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(5), e13216. https://doi.org/10.2196/13216

Ghaith, A., Alshirbini, M., & Ma, H. (2026). Understanding surgeon adoption of artificial intelligence surgical technology: Integrating UTAUT–TOE model. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 20(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-01803-0

Goh, B. K. P., & Teo, R. Y. A. (2020). Current status of laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic surgery and its adoption in Singapore. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 49(6), 377–383.

Habibi, A., Mailizar, M., Yaqin, L. N., Alqahtani, T. M., Abrar, M., Hamuddin, B., & Failasofah, F. (2024). Unlocking English proficiency: YouTube’s impact on speaking skills among Indonesian university students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2485

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hebesberger, D., Koertner, T., Gisinger, C., & Pripfl, J. (2017). A long-term autonomous robot at a care hospital: A mixed methods study on social acceptance and experiences of staff and older adults. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(3), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0392-5

Kusumadewi, H., & Ning, J. (2025). Championing AI in healthcare: The impact of stakeholders on the adoption of robotic telesurgery project in Indonesia. Public Administration and Policy, 28(3), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-01-2025-0007

Laakasuo, M., Palomäki, J., Kunnari, A., Rauhala, S., Drosinou, M., Halonen, J., Lehtonen, N., Koverola, M., Repo, M., & Sundvall, J. (2023). Moral psychology of nursing robots: Exploring the role of robots in dilemmas of patient autonomy. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2886

Lam, T. J. R., Udonwa, S. A., Masuda, Y., Yeo, M. H. X., Harunal Ras, M. F. bin, & Goh, B. K. P. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of neoadjuvant imatinib use in locally advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World Journal of Surgery, 48(7), 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-024-07358-9

Montalti, R., Giglio, M. C., Wu, A. G. R., Cipriani, F., D’Silva, M., Suhool, A., Nghia, P. P., Kato, Y., Lim, C., & Herman, P. (2023). Risk factors and outcomes of open conversion during minimally invasive major hepatectomies: An international multicenter study on 3880 procedures comparing the laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 30(8), 4783–4796. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13345-6

Nayak, S., Nayak, V. C., & Sathvika, G. S. (2024). Exploring the acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 18(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01633-7

Priskila, E., Tecoalu, M., & Winoto, H. (2021). The role of employee engagement in mediating perceived organizational support for millennial employee organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Social Science, 2(3), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v2i3.158

Putera, P. B., Widianingsih, I., Rianto, Y., Ningrum, S., & Suryanto, S. (2022). Human resources of research and innovation in Indonesia: Reality, policy strategy, and roadmap. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 6(3), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v6i3.304

Rabbitt, S. M., Kazdin, A. E., & Scassellati, B. (2015). Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: Applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001

Salam, U., Lee, S., Fullerton, V., Yusuf, Y., Krantz, S., & Henstridge, M. (2018). Indonesia case study: Rapid technological change—Challenges and opportunities. Pathways for Prosperity Commission Background Paper Series.

Shah, P. C., de Groot, A., Cerfolio, R., Huang, W. C., Huang, K., Song, C., Li, Y., Kreaden, U., & Oh, D. S. (2022). Impact of type of minimally invasive approach on open conversions across ten common procedures in different specialties. Surgical Endoscopy, 36(8), 6067–6075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08864-8

Sheetz, K. H., Claflin, J., & Dimick, J. B. (2020). Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Network Open, 3(1), e1918911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911

Winoto, H., Tecoalu, M., & Ferdian, F. (2021). The effect of price perception and brand awareness on service quality mediated by purchasing decisions: Study case on PT Maybank Indonesia Finance credit products. Journal of Humanities, Social Science, Public Administration and Management, 5(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.33830/jhspam.v5i1.1921

Wu, W., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Liu, H. (2022). Exploring factors of the willingness to accept AI-assisted learning environments: An empirical investigation based on the UTAUT model and perceived risk theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 870777. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870777

Published
2026-02-13