Male and Female Youth’s Opportunities to Attend Higher Education: Gender Equality Perspective in the Village
Abstract
This study discusses gender inequality in access to higher education among male and female youth in rural communities. Although education is a fundamental right for both men and women, social and cultural practices in many villages still prioritize males in obtaining higher educational opportunities. Economic limitations, patriarchal values, and traditional perceptions regarding gender roles often influence parents’ decisions in supporting their children’s education. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the opportunities of male and female youth to continue higher education from a gender equality perspective in the village context. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach conducted in a village in Sekotong, West Lombok, Indonesia. The participants consisted of 26 individuals, including 10 parents and 16 students (8 male and 8 female students). Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using transcription, coding, and thematic analysis. The findings reveal that parents generally provide stronger support for sons to pursue higher education because men are considered future family breadwinners and decision-makers. In contrast, daughters are often expected to focus on domestic responsibilities after marriage. Economic hardship also contributes to the unequal educational opportunities experienced by female youth. In conclusion, gender inequality in rural education remains strongly influenced by patriarchal culture and financial limitations, which continue to restrict equal access to higher education for women.
Downloads
References
Antoninis, M., Alcott, B., Al Hadheri, S., April, D., Fouad Barakat, B., Barrios Rivera, M., Baskakova, Y., Barry, M., Bekkouche, Y., & Caro Vasquez, D. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms?
Bhandari, M. P. (2023). Women and society a major field of studies to understand the discrimination. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(2), 78–93.
Bose, B., Martin, A., Raub, A., & Heymann, J. (2025). Assessing the Relationship Between the Implementation of Compulsory Education Laws and Girls’ School Attendance in Twenty-Seven Countries. Social Sciences, 14(12), 703.
Brescoll, V. L. (2016). Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 415–428.
Cole, M. (2022). Education, equality and human rights: issues of gender,’race’, sexuality, disability and social class. Taylor & Francis.
D’Addio, A. (2024). Regulation and governance of non-state early childhood care and education in African countries. UNESCO.
Di, P., Sade, D., & Rembitan, D. (2022). Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Keberagaman Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Keberagaman. 9(2), 41–47.
Fagbemi, O. M. (2025). HIGHER EDUCATION PRIESSIONAL FEMININE DEFICITS IN HEALTH SCIENCES IN NIGERIA. 4(1), 33–40.
Gender, K., Lingkup, D., Dan, P., & Ponorogo, I. (2020). SOSIAL Yuni Sulistyowati PENDAHULUAN : Indonesian Journal of Gender Studies | Volume 1 No . 2 Tahun 2020. 1(2), 1–14.
Hu, A. (2017). Providing more but receiving less: Daughters in intergenerational exchange in mainland China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3), 739–757.
Huang, P., & Liu, X. (n.d.). gender through social interactions in English. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2024, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03293-x
Keluarga, D. (n.d.). Persepsi masyarakat mengenai kesetaraan gender dalam keluarga 1 1. 4(2), 52–58.
Kim, J., Gutter, M. S., & Spangler, T. (2017). Review of family financial decision making: Suggestions for future research and implications for financial education. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 28(2), 253–267.
Kridahl, L., & Duvander, A.-Z. (2021). Are mothers and daughters most important? How gender, childhood family dissolution and parents’ current living arrangements affect the personal care of parents. Social Sciences, 10(5), 160.
Lestari, P. (2024). Gender Equality in Higher Education : A Path to Sustainability (Issue Icssl). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-303-0
Ma, C., Rattanaburi, K., & Gao, C. (2025). Burned out parents, educated kids? Navigating" Juan" culture: Decision-making-process and education in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 9, 100458.
Mataram, D. S., A, M. K. W., Wadi, H., & Zm, H. (2020). Penerapan Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Pendidikan Pada Siswa pengembangan kualitas sumber daya manusia Indonesia perlu berwawasan gender . jenis kelamin tertentu atau bias gender , melainkan harus ada unsur keadilan , keterbukaan. 9(1), 811–822.
Nurmila, N., Riyani, I., & Aripudin, A. (2021). The concept of gender education in the family to help achieve sustainable development goals. 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020), 427–431.
Setiawan, R., Komara, E., & Komara, N. (2025). Kesetaraan Gender dalam Akses Pendidikan di Pendidikan Tinggi : Sebuah Kajian Studi Fenomenologi. 4(1), 2218–2225.
Sudarso, S., Keban, P. E., & Mas’udah, S. (2019). Gender, religion and patriarchy: The educational discrimination of coastal Madurese women, East Java. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 20(9), 2–12.
Vaughn, L. (2019). Psychology and culture: Thinking, feeling and behaving in a global context. Routledge.
Yosefina, B., & Armada, K. (2022). E g e p c. 04(01), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.24071/jaot.v4i1.4223
Copyright (c) 2026 Ni Wayan Desi Ratna Sari, Luh Putu Artini, Dewa Putu Ramendra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
