Sejarah Partai Gerakan Indonesia Raya dan Pengaruh Politiknya pada Pemilu Presiden 2019

  • Audrey G.D Tangkudung Universitas Indonesia
  • Fajar Kurniawan Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: partai gerindra, pemilu presiden 2019, kepemimpinan karismatik, koalisi elektoral, politik indonesia

Abstract

Kemunculan partai-partai politik baru di Indonesia pascareformasi telah secara signifikan mengubah dinamika kompetisi demokrasi, di mana Partai Gerakan Indonesia Raya (Gerindra) menonjol sebagai aktor penting meskipun tergolong partai yang relatif baru didirikan pada tahun 2008. Artikel ini menelaah secara mendalam proses lahirnya serta dinamika pertumbuhan Partai Gerakan Indonesia Raya (Gerindra) sekaligus menelusuri kontribusi dan dampak kekuatan politiknya pada kontestasi Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia tahun 2019. Kajian ini menerapkan perspektif kualitatif dalam ranah sejarah dan politik dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui telaah literatur, pengkajian arsip resmi organisasi, regulasi pemilihan umum, laporan pers nasional, dan berbagai publikasi akademik yang relevan. Kerangka teoretis yang digunakan meliputi teori institusional partai politik, teori kepemimpinan karismatik, dan teori koalisi elektoral. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Gerindra sebagai partai politik relatif baru mampu berkembang pesat melalui penguatan struktur organisasi, sentralitas figur kepemimpinan, dan strategi koalisi elektoral yang adaptif. Dalam konteks Pilpres 2019, Gerindra memainkan peran signifikan dalam membentuk oposisi politik dan memengaruhi dinamika kompetisi demokratis di Indonesia. Temuan ini memperkaya kajian tentang peran partai oposisi dan kepemimpinan karismatik dalam demokrasi elektoral Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aspinall, E. (2014). When brokers betray: Clientelism, social networks, and electoral politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545–570.

Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s democratic paradox: Competitive elections amidst rising illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317.

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (Eds.). (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. Singapore: NUS Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London: Sage.

Harmel, R., & Svåsand, L. (1993). Party leadership and party institutionalisation. West European Politics, 16(2), 67–88.

House, R. J. (1997). Charismatic leadership in service‐producing organizations. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(2), 126–138.

Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6–7), 845–879.

Laver, M., & Schofield, N. (1998). Multiparty government: The politics of coalition in Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Mietzner, M. (2013). Money, power, and ideology: Political parties in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Singapore: NUS Press.

Mietzner, M. (2016). Coercing loyalty: Coalitional presidentialism and party discipline in Indonesia. Comparative Political Studies, 49(6), 781–817.

Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: Electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036.

Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Randall, V., & Svåsand, L. (2002). Party institutionalization in new democracies. Party Politics, 8(1), 5–29.

Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2014). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. London: Routledge.

Slater, D., & Simmons, E. (2018). Coping by colluding: Political uncertainty and authoritarian resilience. Comparative Political Studies, 51(7), 982–1016.

Strøm, K., Müller, W. C., & Bergman, T. (2008). Cabinet and coalition bargaining. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tosh, J. (2015). The pursuit of history (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

Warburton, E. (2020). Deepening polarization and democratic decline in Indonesia. Pacific Review, 33(6), 899–929.

Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia’s democratic regression: Structure, agency and popular opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 255–285.

Published
2026-05-28